Review Article
Chronic Liver Disease in Ethiopia with a Particular Focus on the Etiological Spectrums: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Table 1
Critical appraisal of the primary studies using the JBI Critical appraisal checklist for an analytical cross-sectional study.
| Major components | Muhie [24] | Adhanom and Desalegn [25] | Ayele and Gebre-Selassie [26] | Gaddisa Desu [27] | Taye et al. [28] | Tsega et al. [29] | Mohammed and Ali [30] | Abdelmenan et al. [31] | Orlien et al. [32] | Orlien et al.ā [33] | Terefe Tesfaye [34] | Bihonegn and Ayalewu [35] |
| 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3. Was the exposure measured validly and reliably? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5. Were the confounding factors identified? | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6. Were strategies to deal confounding factors stated? | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7. Were the outcomes measured validly and reliably? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|