Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2935870, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2935870
Research Article

The Validation of a Novel Surveillance System for Monitoring Bloodstream Infections in the Calgary Zone

1Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, TRW Building, Rm 3D10, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4Z6
2Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, 9-3535 Research Road NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2L 2K8
3Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Campus, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N1
4Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Diagnostic & Scientific Centre, 9-3535 Research Road NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2L 2K8
5Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, Calgary Laboratory Services, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, B07 HMRB, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N1

Received 13 November 2015; Accepted 12 May 2016

Academic Editor: Vidula Vachharajani

Copyright © 2016 Jenine R. Leal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Electronic surveillance systems (ESSs) that utilize existing information in databases are more efficient than conventional infection surveillance methods. The objective was to assess an ESS for bloodstream infections (BSIs) in the Calgary Zone for its agreement with traditional medical record review. Methods. The ESS was developed by linking related data from regional laboratory and hospital administrative databases and using set definitions for excluding contaminants and duplicate isolates. Infections were classified as hospital-acquired (HA), healthcare-associated community-onset (HCA), or community-acquired (CA). A random sample of patients from the ESS was then compared with independent medical record review. Results. Among the 308 patients selected for comparative review, the ESS identified 318 episodes of BSI of which 130 (40.9%) were CA, 98 (30.8%) were HCA, and 90 (28.3%) were HA. Medical record review identified 313 episodes of which 136 (43.4%) were CA, 97 (30.9%) were HCA, and 80 (25.6%) were HA. Episodes of BSI were concordant in 304 (97%) cases. Overall, there was 85.5% agreement between ESS and medical record review for the classification of where BSIs were acquired (kappa = 0.78, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.75–0.80). Conclusion. This novel ESS identified and classified BSIs with a high degree of accuracy. This system requires additional linkages with other related databases.