Research Article
Factors Affecting Microbial Load and Profile of Potential Pathogens and Food Spoilage Bacteria from Household Kitchen Tables
Table 4
Effect of usage of towels on the detection rate of potential pathogens and food spoilage bacteria.
| Prevalence of | Cleaning materials of kitchen | Multipurpose sponge versus separate sponge | Multipurpose towel versus separate towel | Multipurpose towel versus separate sponge | Multipurpose sponge versus multipurpose towel |
| Coliforms# | 32.0% vs 0%: : OR = 1.77 (1.51–2.06) | 32.7% vs 0%: : OR = 1.23 (1.06–1.42) | 32.7% vs 0%: : OR = 2.49 (1.92–3.21) | 32.0 vs 32.7%: = NS | Enterococcus spp. | 59.0% vs 0%: : OR = 2.27 (1.80–2.85) | 28.8% vs 0%: : OR = 1.12 (1.06–1.39) | 28.8% vs 0%: : OR = 2.40 (1.88–3.08) | 59.0% vs 28.8%: : OR = 1.52 (1.19–1.93) | S. aureus | 11.5% vs 6.0%: = NS | 50.0% vs 6.0%: : OR = 9.8 (2.88–33.32) | 50.0% vs 6.0%: = NS | 11.5% vs 50.0%: = NS | Pseudomonas spp. | 6.0% vs 0%: : OR = 1.55 (1.38–1.75) | 30.8% vs 0%: : OR = 1.22 (1.06–1.40) | 30.8% vs 0%: : OR = 2.44 (1.90–3.14) | 6.0% vs 30.8%: : OR = 2.63 (1.80–3.83) | Proteus spp. | 0% vs 0%: = NS | 15.4% vs 0%: = NS | 15.4% vs 0%: : OR = 2.18 (1.75–2.71) | 0% vs 15.4%: : OR = 3.27 (2.56–4.19) |
|
|
E. coli and Klebsiella spp. NS: nonsignificant.
|