Research Article
Triatomine Fauna and Recent Epidemiological Dynamics of Chagas Disease in an Endemic Area of Northeast Brazil
Table 2
Relative abundance of triatomines from 2010 to 2016 in the state of Sergipe, Brazil.
| | Risk | Municipality | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Average period |
| | High | Aquidabã | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 1.94 | 4.85 | 1.28 | 2.78 | 1.89 | | Canindé São Francisco | 36.46 | 10.71 | 22.30 | 33.98 | 8.74 | 19.23 | 8.33 | 19.96 | | Itabaianinha | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | | Lagarto | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 0.40 | | Poço Redondo | 19.79 | 34.29 | 20.95 | 9.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 12.50 | | Ribeirópolis | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 24.27 | 2.91 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 4.93 |
| | Medium | Cedro de São João | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | | Cumbe | 2.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.83 | | Estancia | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.18 | | Feira Nova | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.43 | | Frei Paulo | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | | Gararu | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 2.91 | 6.80 | 14.10 | 2.78 | 4.12 | | Gracho Cardoso | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | | Itabi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.11 | 1.59 | | Macambira | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.18 | | Monte Alegre de Sergipe | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | | Nossa Senhora Aparecida | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.19 | | Nossa Senhora da Gloria | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.19 | | Nossa Senhora de Lourdes | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.40 | | Pedra Mole | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | | Pedrinhas | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | | Poço Verde | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 0.87 | | Porto da Folha | 0.52 | 0.00 | 6.08 | 3.88 | 7.77 | 15.38 | 22.22 | 7.98 | | Riachão do Dantas | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | | Salgado | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | | Santa Luzia do Itanhy | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | | Simão Dias | 4.17 | 22.14 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 4.68 | | Tobias Barreto | 18.23 | 26.43 | 38.51 | 14.56 | 60.19 | 38.46 | 38.89 | 33.61 | | Tomar do Geru | 2.08 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| | Low | Propriá | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 0.40 | | São Francisco | 1.56 | 2.14 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 1.02 |
| | UC | Pinhão | 1.56 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| | Total municipalities evaluated per year | 21 | 8 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 11 | — |
|
|
Risk of transmission of CD according to the classification guidelines of the Ministry of Health. UC: unclassified [ 37]. |
