Research Article
Detection and Quantification of Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Anadara subcrenata in the Zhoushan Archipelago
Table 7
Prevalence of contamination of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Anadara subcrenata among different seasons and markets.
| Seasons | Aqua farm | Retail market | χ2 value | P value | Number of samples | Positive rate % | Median of tdh or tlh positive samples (MPN/g) | Number of samples | Positive rate % | Median of tdh or tlh positive samples (MPN/g) |
| Spring | 5 | 23.81 | 21 | 5 | 15.15 | 1.1 | 2.667 | 0.072 | Summer | 5 | 13.16 | 30 | 3 | 5.00 | 3 | 2.457 | 0.087 | Autumn | 6 | 19.35 | 9.25 | 1 | 2.63 | 7.4 | 4.726 | <0.05 | Winter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | χ2 value | | 2.115 | | | 3.021 | | | | P value | | 0.099 | | | <0.05 | | | |
|
|
The positive rate of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus between different markets was significantly different only in autumn ( ). |