Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Volume 2017, Article ID 5369625, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5369625
Research Article

Associations between 18F-FDG-PET, DWI, and DCE Parameters in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Depend on Tumor Grading

1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 18, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
3Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Alexey Surov; ed.gizpiel-inu.nizidem@vorus.yexela

Received 23 June 2017; Revised 31 August 2017; Accepted 12 September 2017; Published 19 October 2017

Academic Editor: Jie Lu

Copyright © 2017 Leonard Leifels et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. J. M. Braakhuis, C. R. Leemans, and O. Visser, “Incidence and survival trends of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2011,” Oral Oncology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 670–675, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Powell, M. Schmidt, M. Borri et al., “Changes in functional imaging parameters following induction chemotherapy have important implications for individualised patient-based treatment regimens for advanced head and neck cancer,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 112–117, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Han, S. Y. O. Kim, S. J. I. Lee, and J. W. O. Choi, “The correlations between mri perfusion, diffusion parameters, and 18F-FDG PET metabolic parameters in primary head-and-neck cancer: a cross-sectional analysis in single institute,” Medicine, vol. 94, no. 47, Article ID e2141, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Wang, S. Takashima, F. Takayama et al., “Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 220, no. 3, pp. 621–630, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. Khan, N. Oriuchi, H. Ninomiya, T. Higuchi, H. Kamada, and K. Endo, “Positron emission tomographic imaging with 11C-choline in differential diagnosis of head and neck tumors: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 409–417, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. P. Noij, M. C. De Jong, L. G. M. Mulders et al., “Contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review,” Oral Oncology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 124–138, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Bisdas, O. Seitz, M. Middendorp et al., “An exploratory pilot study into the association between microcirculatory parameters derived by MRI-based pharmacokinetic analysis and glucose utilization estimated by PET-CT imaging in head and neck cancer,” European Radiology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2358–2366, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Gawlitza, S. Purz, K. Kubiessa et al., “In vivo correlation of glucose metabolism, cell density and microcirculatory parameters in patients with head and neck cancer: initial results using simultaneous PET/MRI,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, Article ID e0134749, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Covello, C. Cavaliere, M. Aiello et al., “Simultaneous PET/MR head-neck cancer imaging: preliminary clinical experience and multiparametric evaluation,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1269–1276, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Nakajo, M. Nakajo, Y. Kajiya et al., “FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of prognostic significance between primary tumor standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 475–480, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Fruehwald-Pallamar, C. Czerny, M. E. Mayerhoefer et al., “Functional imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: correlation of PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1009–1019, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. H. Choi, J. C. Paeng, C.-H. Sohn et al., “Correlation of 18F-FDG uptake with apparent diffusion coefficient ratio measured on standard and high b value diffusion MRI in head and neck cancer,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1056–1062, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. H. Rasmussen, M. Nørgaard, A. E. Hansen et al., “Feasibility of multiparametric imaging with PET/MR in head and neck Squamous cell carcinoma,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Surov, P. Stumpp, H. J. Meyer et al., “Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI: associations between diffusion, glucose metabolism and histopathological parameters in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Oral Oncology, vol. 58, pp. 14–20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Surov, H. J. Meyer, M. Gawlitza et al., “Correlations between DCE MRI and histopathological parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Translational Oncology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. S. Tofts and A. G. Kermode, “Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 357–367, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Y. Kim, J.-L. Roh, J. S. Kim et al., “Utility of FDG PET in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 208–215, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Zhang et al., “Prognostic value of the primary lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 541 cases,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, Article ID 12242, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Zheng, Y. Chen, Y. Chen et al., “Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a preliminary study of the correlations between quantitative parameters and clinical stage,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 940–948, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. I. Sawazaki-Calone, A. L. C. A. Rangel, A. G. Bueno et al., “The prognostic value of histopathological grading systems in oral squamous cell carcinomas,” Oral Diseases, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 755–761, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Anneroth and L. S. Hansen, “A methodologic study of histologic classification and grading of malignancy in oral squamous cell carcinoma,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 448–468, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus