Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8650853, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8650853
Research Article

The Spatial Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Standardized Uptake Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Has a Crucial Influence on the Numeric Correlation of Both Parameters in PET/MRI of Lung Tumors

1University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
2Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
3University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
4Siemens Healthineers, Freilagerstrasse 40, 8047 Zürich, Switzerland

Correspondence should be addressed to Alexander W. Sauter; hc.bsu@retuas.rednaxela

Received 2 June 2017; Revised 18 September 2017; Accepted 2 October 2017; Published 17 December 2017

Academic Editor: Dinesh K. Deelchand

Copyright © 2017 Alexander W. Sauter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Lardinois, W. Weder, T. F. Hany et al., “Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 25, pp. 2500–2507, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. M. Toloza, L. Harpole, and D. C. McCrory, “Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the current evidence,” CHEST, vol. 123, no. 1, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Deng, “Meta-analysis of the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and standardized uptake value,” Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, vol. 2017, p. 16, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  4. T. Takahara, Y. Imai, T. Yamashita, S. Yasuda, S. Nasu, and M. Van Cauteren, “Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): Technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display,” Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 275–282, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Takahara and T. C. Kwee, “Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology,” European Radiology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1937–1952, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Kato, K. Kudo, H. Yamashita et al., “Differences in morphological features and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values among breast cancer subtypes using 3-tesla MRI,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S.-Y. Lee, W.-H. Jee, J.-Y. Jung et al., “Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumours: use of additive qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging to standard MR imaging at 3.0 T,” European Radiology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 743–754, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Namimoto, M. Nakagawa, and Y. Kizaki, “Characterization of liver tumors by diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison of diagnostic performance using the mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 453–461, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Rose, M. Fay, P. Thomas et al., “Correlation of MRI-derived apparent diffusion coefficients in newly diagnosed gliomas with [18F]-Fluoro-L-Dopa PET: What are we really measuring with minimum ADC?” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 758–764, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Sommer, M. Wiese, L. Winter et al., “Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2859–2867, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. D. Travis, E. Brambilla, A. G. Nicholson et al., “The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1243–1260, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Brambilla, R. Matheoud, C. Basile et al., “An adaptive thresholding method for BTV estimation incorporating PET reconstruction parameters: a multicenter study of the robustness and the reliability,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 571473, 12 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Schmidt, C. Brendle, C. Schraml et al., “Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 247–255, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Regier, T. Derlin, D. Schwarz et al., “Diffusion weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): does the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) correlate with tracer uptake (SUV)?” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 2913–2918, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Wang, J. Yi, X. Ma, W. Yang, and J. Wang, “Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value at 3.0 T diffusion-weighted MR with total lesion glycolysis(TLG) on 18F-FDG PET/CT of NSCLC,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 57, 2, p. 241, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  16. P. Heusch, C. Buchbender, J. Köhler et al., “Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: Initial results,” RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, vol. 185, no. 11, pp. 1056–1062, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Heusch, J. Köhler, H.-J. Wittsack et al., “Hybrid [18F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC),” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 2055–2060, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Iizuka, Y. Matsuo, S. Umeoka et al., “Prediction of clinical outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer using diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 2087–2092, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Metz, C. Ganter, S. Lorenzen et al., “Multiparametric MR and PET imaging of intratumoral biological heterogeneity in patients with metastatic lung cancer using voxel-by-voxel analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, Article ID e0132386, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Tsuchida, M. Morikawa, Y. Demura, Y. Umeda, H. Okazawa, and H. Kimura, “Imaging the early response to chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared to fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 80–88, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Rakheja, L. DeMello, H. Chandarana et al., “Comparison of the accuracy of PET/CT and PET/MRI spatial registration of multiple metastatic lesions,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 201, no. 5, pp. 1120–1123, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Rakheja, H. Chandarana, L. DeMello et al., “Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 201, no. 5, pp. 1115–1119, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Hatt, C. Cheze-Le Rest, A. Van Baardwijk, P. Lambin, O. Pradier, and D. Visvikis, “Impact of tumor size and tracer uptake heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET and CT non-small cell lung cancer tumor delineation,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1690–1697, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Chen et al., “Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour cellularity in lung cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 6, Article ID e99865, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N.-J. Gong, C.-S. Wong, Y.-C. Chu, H. Guo, B. Huang, and Q. Chan, “Increasing the accuracy of volume and ADC delineation for heterogeneous tumor on diffusion-weighted MRI: correlation with PET/CT,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 407–413, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Cui, J.-B. Yin, C.-H. Hu, S.-C. Gong, J.-F. Xu, and J.-S. Yang, “Inter- and intraobserver agreement of ADC measurements of lung cancer in free breathing, breath-hold and respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted MRI,” Clinical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 892–896, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Bernardin, N. H. M. Douglas, D. J. Collins et al., “Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lung lesions: Repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement,” European Radiology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 502–511, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. C. Adams, T. G. Turkington, J. M. Wilson, and T. Z. Wong, “A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 310–320, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. M. Sawicki, J. Grueneisen, C. Buchbender et al., “Comparative performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection and characterization of pulmonary lesions in 121 oncologic patients,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 582–586, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus