Research Article
Kinetic Modelling of Infection Tracers [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-Citrate, [11C]Methionine, and [11C]Donepezil in a Porcine Osteomyelitis Model
Table 2
Evaluation of the fitting models for the investigated tracers and input functions.
| Tracer | Number of OM + ST foci modelled | Plasma input function | Visual impression of fit | Linear Patlak plot | Lowest |
| 18FFDG | 8 + 7 | Uncorrected | Good fit of both 2TCM, with rev2TCM giving only minor improvement over irr2TCM. Poor fit of 1TCM. | Yes | rev2TCM |
| 68GaGa-citrate | 2 + 3 | Uncorrected | Good fit of both 2TCM, with 1TCM reasonable for some curves. | Yes | irr2TCM or rev2TCM |
| 11Cmethionine | 17 + 7 | Uncorrected | Good fits of rev2TCM. Cases with good irr2TCM fit (generally low-lying curves). | No | See main text | Metab. corr. | For irr2TCM, the fit was improved over the uncorrected input function. Overall, rev2TCM appeared best. | Almost |
| 11Cdonepezil | 11 + 2 | Uncorrected | Poor fits for all models. | No | See main text | Metab. corr. | Good fits with 1TCM, only slightly improved by 2TCM (irr or rev). | Generally not |
|
|