Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Volume 2018, Article ID 2391925, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2391925
Research Article

Automated Whole-Body Bone Lesion Detection for Multiple Myeloma on 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT Imaging Using Deep Learning Methods

1Department of Informatics, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU München, Munich, Germany
3Institute of Medical Engineering, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Kuangyu Shi; ed.mut@ihs.k

Received 28 July 2017; Revised 29 November 2017; Accepted 12 December 2017; Published 8 January 2018

Academic Editor: Yun Zhou

Copyright © 2018 Lina Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Terpos and N. Kanellias, Practical Considerations for Bone Health in Multiple MyelomaPersonalized Therapy for Multiple Myeloma, Springer, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. E. Terpos and M.-A. Dimopoulos, “Myeloma bone disease: Pathophysiology and management,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1223–1231, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. D. Collins, “Problems monitoring response in multiple myeloma,” Cancer Imaging, vol. 5, no. special issue A, pp. S119–S126, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. N. S. Callander and G. D. Roodman, “Myeloma bone disease,” Seminars in Hematology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 276–285, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Lütje, J. W. J. Rooy, S. Croockewit, E. Koedam, W. J. G. Oyen, and R. A. Raymakers, “Role of radiography, MRI and FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing, staging and therapeutical evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 88, no. 12, pp. 1161–1168, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Dimopoulos, E. Terpos, R. L. Comenzo et al., “International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma,” Leukemia, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1545–1556, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Horger, C. D. Claussen, U. Bross-Bach et al., “Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 289–297, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. C. Dutoit and K. L. Verstraete, “MRI in multiple myeloma: a pictorial review of diagnostic and post-treatment findings,” Insights into Imaging, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 553–569, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. A. Dimopoulos, J. Hillengass, S. Usmani et al., “Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 657–664, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Van Lammeren-Venema, J. C. Regelink, I. I. Riphagen, S. Zweegman, O. S. Hoekstra, and J. M. Zijlstra, “18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in assessment of myeloma-related bone disease: a systematic review,” Cancer, vol. 118, no. 8, pp. 1971–1981, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Nakamoto, “Clinical contribution of PET/CT in myeloma: from the perspective of a radiologist,” Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 10-11, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. F. Healy, J. G. Murray, S. J. Eustace, J. Madewell, P. J. O'Gorman, and P. O'Sullivan, “Multiple myeloma: a review of imaging features and radiological techniques,” Bone Marrow Research, vol. 2011, pp. 1–9, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Cavo, E. Terpos, C. Nanni et al., “Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. e206–e217, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Moreau, M. Attal, D. Caillot et al., “Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography at diagnosis and before maintenance therapy in symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 trial: results of the IMAJEM study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 35, no. 25, pp. 2911–2918, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Vag, C. Gerngross, P. Herhaus et al., “First experience with chemokine receptor CXCR4 Targeted PET imaging of patients with solid cancers,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 741–746, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Philipp-Abbrederis, K. Herrmann, S. Knop et al., “In vivo molecular imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in patients with advanced multiple myeloma,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 477–487, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Lapa, M. Schreder, A. Schirbel et al., “[68Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in multiple myeloma—comparison to [18F]FDG and laboratory values,” Theranostics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 205–212, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. L. Belton, S. Saini, K. Liebermann, G. W. Boland, and E. F. Halpern, “Tumour size measurement in an oncology clinical trial: comparison between off-site and on-site measurements,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 311–314, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Fonti, M. Larobina, S. Del Vecchio et al., “Metabolic tumor volume assessed by18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1829–1835, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Foster, U. Bagci, A. Mansoor, Z. Xu, and D. J. Mollura, “A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 50, pp. 76–96, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. U. Bagci, J. K. Udupa, N. Mendhiratta et al., “Joint segmentation of anatomical and functional images: applications in quantification of lesions from PET, PET-CT, MRI-PET, and MRI-PET-CT images,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 929–945, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. T. Taylor and E. V. Garcia, “Computer-assisted diagnosis in renal nuclear medicine: Rationale, methodology, and interpretative criteria for diuretic renography,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 146–158, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Petrick, B. Sahiner, S. G. Armato III et al., “Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems,” Medical Physics, vol. 40, no. 8, Article ID 087001, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. J. Gilbert, S. M. Astley, M. G. C. Gillan et al., “Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 16, pp. 1675–1684, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. H. Eadie, P. Taylor, and A. P. Gibson, “A systematic review of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. e70–e76, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Shin, H. R. Roth, M. Gao et al., “Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1285–1298, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Kourou, T. P. Exarchos, K. P. Exarchos, M. V. Karamouzis, and D. I. Fotiadis, “Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 13, pp. 8–17, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Halt, C. C. Le Rest, A. Turzo, C. Roux, and D. Visvikis, “A fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian segmentation approach for volume determination in PET,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 881–893, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Hatt, C. Cheze-Le Rest, A. Van Baardwijk, P. Lambin, O. Pradier, and D. Visvikis, “Impact of tumor size and tracer uptake heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET and CT non-small cell lung cancer tumor delineation,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1690–1697, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Q. Song, M. Chen, J. Bai, M. Sonka, and X. Wu, “Surface–region context in optimal multi-object graph-based segmentation: robust delineation of pulmonary tumors,” in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, vol. 6801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 61–72, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. Q. Song, J. Bai, D. Han et al., “Optimal Co-segmentation of tumor in PET-CT images with context information,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1685–1697, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Q. Song, J. Bai, M. K. Garvin, M. Sonka, J. M. Buatti, and X. Wu, “Optimal multiple surface segmentation with shape and context priors,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 376–386, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. Ju, D. Xiang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, I. Kopriva, and X. Chen, “Random walk and graph cut for co-segmentation of lung tumor on PET-CT images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 5854–5867, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. Z. Xu, U. Bagci, J. K. Udupa, and D. J. Mollura, “Fuzzy connectedness image Co-segmentation for HybridPET/MRI and PET/CT scans,” in Proceedings of the CMMI-MICCAI, vol. 22, pp. 15–24, Springer, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Thomas, C. Schabel, B. Krauss et al., “Dual-energy CT: Virtual calcium subtraction for assessment of bone marrow involvement of the spine in multiple myeloma,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. W324–W331, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Martínez-Martínez, J. Kybic, L. Lambert, and Z. Mecková, “Fully automated classification of bone marrow infiltration in low-dose CT of patients with multiple myeloma based on probabilistic density model and supervised learning,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 71, pp. 57–66, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Leydon, M. O’Connell, D. Greene, and K. Curran, Semi-automatic Bone Marrow Evaluation in PETCT for Multiple MyelomaAnnual Conference on Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, Springer, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. Y. Nishida, S. Kimura, H. Mizobe et al., “Automatic digital quantification of bone marrow myeloma volume in appendicular skeletons—clinical implications and prognostic significance,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 12885, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. L. Lambert, P. Ourednicek, Z. Meckova, G. Gavelli, J. Straub, and I. Spicka, “Whole-body low-dose computed tomography in multiple myeloma staging: superior diagnostic performance in the detection of bone lesions, vertebral compression fractures, rib fractures and extraskeletal findings compared to radiography with similar radiation exposure,” Oncology Letters, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2490–2494, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. Silver, A. Huang, C. J. Maddison et al., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. N. Tajbakhsh, M. B. Gotway, and J. Liang, “Computer-aided pulmonary embolism detection using a novel vessel-aligned multi-planar image representation and convolutional neural networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '15), vol. 9350 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 62–69, Springer, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. H. R. Roth, L. Lu, and J. Liu, “Improving computer-aided detection using convolutional neural networks and random view aggregation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1170–1181, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell, “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '15), pp. 3431–3440, IEEE, Boston, MA, USA, June 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention and Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '15), vol. 9351 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 234–241, November 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. F. Milletari, N. Navab, and S.-A. Ahmadi, “V-Net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV '16), pp. 565–571, IEEE, October 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. Kamnitsas, C. Ledig, V. F. J. Newcombe et al., “Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 36, pp. 61–78, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. F. Christ, M. E. A. Elshaer, F. Ettlinger et al., “Automatic liver and lesion segmentation in CT using cascaded fully convolutional neural networks and 3D conditional random fields,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '16), vol. 9901 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 415–423, Springer, October 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. A. Gavrielides, L. M. Kinnard, K. J. Myers et al., “A resource for the assessment of lung nodule size estimation methods: Database of thoracic CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 15244–15255, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. X. Cheng, Z. Li, Z. Liu et al., “Direct parametric image reconstruction in reduced parameter space for rapid multi-tracer PET imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1498–1512, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. Delso, S. Fürst, B. Jakoby et al., “Performance measurements of the siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1914–1922, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. Anbeek, K. L. Vincken, and M. A. Viergever, “Automated MS-lesion segmentation by k-nearest neighbor classification,” MIDAS Journal, 2008. View at Google Scholar