Research Article
Cervical Cancer: Associations between Metabolic Parameters and Whole Lesion Histogram Analysis Derived from Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI
Table 4
Correlation between ADC histogram parameters and 18F-FDG-PET parameters in cervical cancer. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient was used.
| | SUVmax | SUVmean | SUVmedian | TLG | MTV |
| Mean ADC | (rho) | −0.134 | −0.215 | −0.336 | −0.461 | −0.546 | | 0.595 | 0.392 | 0.173 | 0.054 | 0.019 | Min ADC | (rho) | −0.218 | −0.213 | −0.282 | −0.219 | −0.257 | | 0.385 | 0.396 | 0.257 | 0.382 | 0.303 | Max ADC | (rho) | −0.044 | −0.166 | −0.176 | 0.166 | 0.162 | | 0.861 | 0.510 | 0.484 | 0.510 | 0.521 | P10 ADC | (rho) | −0.183 | −0.223 | −0.332 | −0.413 | −0.473 | | 0.468 | 0.373 | 0.179 | 0.088 | 0.047 | P25 ADC | (rho) | −0.150 | −0.214 | −0.329 | −0.486 | −0.569 | | 0.553 | 0.395 | 0.182 | 0.041 | 0.014 | P75 ADC | (rho) | −0.142 | −0.244 | −0.354 | −0.490 | −0.576 | | 0.575 | 0.329 | 0.150 | 0.039 | 0.012 | P90 ADC | (rho) | −0.215 | −0.275 | −0.361 | −0.513 | −0.585 | | 0.392 | 0.270 | 0.142 | 0.029 | 0.011 | Median ADC | (rho) | −0.153 | −0.244 | −0.368 | −0.497 | −0.577 | | 0.544 | 0.329 | 0.133 | 0.036 | 0.012 | Mode ADC | (rho) | −0.225 | −0.157 | −0.261 | −0.546 | −0.597 | | 0.370 | 0.533 | 0.296 | 0.019 | 0.009 | Kurtosis | (rho) | −0.150 | −0.148 | −0.117 | 0.288 | 0.284 | | 0.553 | 0.559 | 0.645 | 0.247 | 0.254 | Skewness | (rho) | −0.095 | −0.054 | −0.004 | 0.149 | 0.142 | | 0.708 | 0.832 | 0.987 | 0.556 | 0.573 | Entropy | (rho) | 0.071 | −0.036 | −0.049 | 0.084 | 0.172 | | 0.779 | 0.887 | 0.848 | 0.742 | 0.494 |
|
|
Significant correlations are highlighted in bold.
|