Research Article

Preoperatively Grading Rectal Cancer with the Combination of Intravoxel Incoherent Motions Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

Table 2

Diffusion parameters among different histologic grades.

D (×10−9 m2/s)fD (×10−9 m2/s)Dapp (×10−9 m2/s)Kapp

All subjects (n = 58)1.282 ± 0.1640.237 ± 0.07045.458 ± 11.8011.440 ± 0.2010.739 ± 0.127
WHO grade 1 (n = 11)1.465 ± 0.0810.292 ± 0.06740.329 ± 7.3991.699 ± 0.0990.604 ± 0.058
WHO grade 2 (n = 29)1.323 ± 0.1050.244 ± 0.05245.622 ± 11.1871.460 ± 0.1270.715 ± 0.091
WHO grade 3 (n = 18)1.105 ± 0.1030.192 ± 0.07248.329 ± 14.2391.250 ± 0.1440.862 ± 0.099
Low grade (1 and 2) (n = 40)1.362 ± 0.1170.257 ± 0.05944.166 ± 10.4701.526 ± 0.1610.684 ± 0.096
High grade (3) (n = 18)1.105 ± 0.1030.192 ± 0.07248.329 ± 14.2391.250 ± 0.1440.862 ± 0.099
value (grade 1 vs. grade 2)0.0010.0790.412<0.0010.003
value (grade 1 vs. grade 3)<0.001<0.0010.182<0.001<0.001
value (grade 2 vs. grade 3)<0.0010.0180.721<0.001<0.001
value (low grade vs. high grade)<0.0010.0020.276<0.001<0.001

D: true diffusion coefficient, D: pseudodiffusion coefficient, Dapp: apparent diffusion coefficient derived from DKI, f: perfusion fraction, Kapp: apparent diffusion kurtosis coefficient.