Research Article

Diagnostic Value of Seven Different Imaging Modalities for Patients with Neuroblastic Tumors: A Network Meta-Analysis

Table 3

Subgroup pairwise meta-analysis for DR of NTs.

Included studiesComparisonsHeterogeneity assessmentPairwise meta-analysis
I2PhOR (95%CI)ZP

Primary tumor
1 study123I-MIBG vs. 18F-FDOPANANA0.294 (0.028–3.138)1.010.311
1 study123I-MIBG vs. 18F-FDGNANA2.355 (0.986–5.621)1.930.054
1 study123I-MIBG vs. 111In-pentetreotideNANA9.486 (3.484–25.826)4.40<0.001
1 study68Ga-SSAs vs. 131I-MIBGNANA1.000 (0.232–4.310)0.001.000
2 studies18F-FDG vs. 131I-MIBG0.0%0.8721.533 (0.535–4.396)0.800.427

Bone and bone marrow metastases
1 study18F-FDOPA vs. 123I-MIBGNANA5.283 (2.325–12.005)3.97<0.001
1 study123I-MIBG vs. 131I-MIBGNANA0.645 (0.120–3.472)0.510.610
4 studies123I-MIBG vs. 18F-FDG93.5%<0.0012.402 (0.490–11.781)1.080.280
2 studiesCT or MRI vs. 123I-MIBG46.6%0.1717.170 (4.503–11.415)8.30<0.001
2 studies18F-FDG vs. 131I-MIBG95.1%<0.0010.339 (0.004–32.575)0.460.642
1 studyCT or MRI vs. 18F-FDGNANA4.525 (2.778–7.353)6.07<0.001

Primary tumor and metastases
2 studies18F-FDOPA vs. 123I-MIBG26.5%0.2445.943 (3.480–10.149)6.53<0.001
1 study123I-MIBG vs. 68Ga-SSAsNANA0.280 (0.075–1.047)1.890.059
3 studies123I-MIBG vs. 131I-MIBG66.1%0.0521.280 (0.429–3.818)0.440.658
3 studies123I-MIBG vs. 18F-FDG93.3%<0.0011.541 (0.342–6.938)0.560.573
2 studiesCT or MRI vs. 123I-MIBG89.7%0.0024.291 (0.813–22.640)1.720.086
2 studies18F-FDOPA vs. CT or MRI80.1%0.0251.363 (0.411–4.522)0.510.613
2 studies131I-MIBG vs. 18F-FDG0.0%0.79722.563 (8.020–63.480)5.90<0.001
1 studyCT or MRI vs. 18F-FDGNANA4.926 (1.808–13.333)3.120.02
1 study131I-MIBG vs. CT or MRINANA3.086 (1.350–7.054)2.670.008

NTs, neuroblastic tumors; DR, detection rate.