Efficacy Analysis of Double-Low Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT and Hepatic Extracellular Volume Fraction in the Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis

Liang, Zhandong; Liu, Yanxia; Nie, Yuanwen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8089914

Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Automated Interpretable and Lightweight Deep Learning Models for Molecular Images

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8089914 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8089914

Efficacy Analysis of Double-Low Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT and Hepatic Extracellular Volume Fraction in the Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis

Zhandong Liang,¹Yanxia Liu,²and Yuanwen Nie³

Academic Editor: Shailendra Tiwari

Received07 Jul 2022

Revised29 Jul 2022

Accepted03 Aug 2022

Published17 Aug 2022

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the study was to analyze the efficacy of double-low dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and hepatic extracellular volume fraction (fECV) in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis (LF). Methods. A total of 200 patients with LF and cirrhosis who underwent the histopathological examination of liver biopsy and multiphase DCE-CT of the liver at the same time in our hospital (January 2020–December 2020) were selected as the research subjects, and the degree of liver fibrosis was staged according to pathological criteria to analyze the clinical diagnostic value of double-low DCE-CT and fECV. Results. Compared with the S2–S4 group, the S1 group had obviously higher Eaorta and HCT values (), a lower fECV value (), and lower serum IVC and LN levels (P < 0.001). Serum IVC and LN levels were positively correlated with fECV (r₁ = 0.803 and r₂ = 0.890; ). The fECV had the highest specificity and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of S1 and had the highest sensitivity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of S2–S4. Conclusion. The double-low DCE-CT and fECV can provide a reliable basis for the clinical diagnosis of LF, and their results will provide a new direction for the treatment of LF and have a high application value in the clinical practice.

1. Introduction

Liver fibrosis (LF), the abnormal accumulation of liver extracellular matrix, especially collagen fibers [1], with the clinical symptoms of dyspepsia, anorexia, and fatigue, can progress to cirrhosis or liver cancer without timely clinical intervention. It has been found that LF is a compensatory repair reaction after liver injury and a process of dynamic pathological changes [2]. Since the occurrence of LF runs through the pathological process of chronic liver diseases, it is speculated that effectively preventing or delaying the occurrence of LF is beneficial to the treatment of chronic liver diseases. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are of great significance to restore the function and structure of damaged liver tissues. The histopathological examination results of liver biopsy are taken as the gold standard for the diagnosis of LF, but this invasive examination method with too little sampling can easily cause complications such as pneumothorax and local pain of puncture, resulting in its limited clinical application [3, 4]. In recent years, noninvasive diagnostic techniques have been widely used to evaluate LF. Double-low dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) obtains the CT images of the routine phase with a low contrast medium concentration and low radiation dose, which can not only greatly improve the accuracy of evaluating liver diseases but also meet the needs of clinical application [5, 6]. The application of this imaging technology can lessen the interference of noise on images, reduce artifacts, achieve an easier and more accurate reading of images, and facilitate better disease diagnosis by physicians. Hepatic extracellular volume fraction (fECV) can measure the extracellular space as the percentage of noncellular tissue volume. It has certain advantages in clinical diagnosis because this value is a physiologically intuitive measurement unit independent of the field strength and may be more suitable for follow-up investigation and study with different imaging methods [7, 8]. In this study, the histopathological examination results of liver biopsy of the selected subjects were taken as the gold standard, and the clinical efficacy of fECV for the diagnosis of LF was investigated by quantitative analysis of liver extracellular matrix volume of double-low DCE-CT. This study aimed to provide new technologies and ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of LF, better guide clinicians to formulate and adjust treatment plans in time, improve disease prognosis, and enhance the quality of life of patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Information

A total of 200 patients with LF and cirrhosis who underwent the histopathological examination of liver biopsy and multiphase DCE-CT of the liver at the same time in our hospital (January 2020–December 2020) were selected as the research subjects, including 115 males and 85 females aged 24–63 years, with an average age of (41.97 ± 12.11) years and an average BMI of (21.87 ± 1.59) kg/m². In terms of the education degree, there were 28 undergraduates, 32 junior college students, 52 high school students, 56 junior school students, 21 primary school students, and 11 illiterate people, of whom 96 patients lived in urban areas and 104 in rural areas. This study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) [9]. The flow diagram of the study is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients had no previous clinical treatment and were aged over 18 years; (2) patients and their families knew the purpose of the experiment and signed the consent form. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with mental disorders; (2) patients with advanced cirrhosis and liver tumors; (3) pregnant or lactating women.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Double-Low DCE-CT

The 64-slice spiral CT scanner (manufacturer: TOSHIBA company; model: Aquilion ONE) was used for scanning. After fasting for more than 4h before scanning, the patients were instructed to take the supine position, and the scanning range was from the diaphragmatic dome to the lower edge of the liver and spleen. After plain scanning, a high-pressure syringe (OptiVantage DH) was used for the intravenous bolus injection of 60 mL of the contrast agent iodixanol (NMPA approval no. H20113465; manufacturer: Beijing Beilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; specification: 270 mgI/mL) at a rate of 4.0 mL/s, followed by the injection of normal saline (30 mL) at the same speed. The multiphase-enhanced scanning time was about 25 s in the arterial phase, 60 s in the portal phase, 180 s in the equilibrium phase, and 600 s in the delayed phase. The scan parameters of patients were 80 KV, and automatic milliampere (range of 9–500 mA) was combined with adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) technology. The volume data of each phase were imported into Vitrea fx workstation for image analysis and processing.

2.3.2. Measurement of fECV

With the division method of five lobes and eight segments in the liver, the ROI of about 1.0 cm² in each segment was selected to measure the CT values of the segments in plain scanning, equilibrium phase, and delay phase. Upon the selection of ROI, the blood vessels, bile duct, and occupying lesions were avoided. The CT values of the abdominal aorta in plain scanning, equilibrium phase, and delayed phase were also measured, and the ROI was as large as possible while avoiding the vascular wall. All the above measurements were performed three times, and the average values were taken. Absolute enhancement values of liver parenchyma (Eliver) and aorta (Eaorta) of each segment = CT values in the equilibrium phase (delayed phase)—CT values in the plain phase. In equilibrium, the distribution volume of the contrast medium was 1-hematocrit (1-Hct). fECV (%) = Eliver × [100 − Hct (%)]/Eaorta.

2.4. Pathological Diagnostic Criteria

S1 referred to the fibrous enlargement of the portal area and localized perisinusoid fibrosis. S2 referred to the fibrosis around the portal area, formation of fibrous septa in the lobule, and retention of lobule structure. S3 showed a large number of fibrous septa, with lobular structural disorders and no cirrhosis. S4 showed evident structural disorders of the lobule, with early cirrhosis.

2.5. Detection of Serological Indicators

Fasting venous blood (3 mL) was collected on the day of imaging examination, and the supernatant was collected after routine centrifugation for detection. Serum IV collagen (IVC) and laminin (LN) were detected by radioimmunoassay, with the IVC kits purchased from Shenzhen New Industries Biomedical Engineering Co., Ltd. and LN kits from Shanghai Xinfan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The detection was performed strictly according to the kit instructions.

2.6. Statistical Methods

The quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), and the parameter or nonparameter tests were adopted to analyze the comparison among multiple groups according to whether the data were normally distributed and homogeneity of variance. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the statistical differences in the fECV values between groups and within groups, and Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze whether there was a correlation between fECV values and cirrhosis staging. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the accuracy of fECV in the diagnosis of LF and define the demarcation values. With the histopathological examination results of liver biopsy as the gold standard, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of fECV values were calculated. The area under the curve (AUC) between 0.5 and 0.7 indicated a low diagnostic value, that between 0.7 and 0.9 suggested a moderate diagnostic, and that above 0.9 showed a high diagnostic value. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS19.0 software, and the differences were statistically significant at .

3. Results

3.1. Histopathological Diagnosis of Liver Biopsy

Among the 200 patients, 42 cases were diagnosed as stage S1, 47 cases as stage S2, 56 cases as stage S3, and 55 cases as stage S4 after the histopathological examination of liver biopsy. According to the severity of LF, the patients were split into the S1 group (n = 42) and the S2–S4 group (significant liver fibrosis, n = 158).

3.2. Comparison of Double-Low DCE-CT Parameters and fECV Values

Table 1 shows obviously higher Eaorta and HCT values () and a lower fECV value () in the S1 group than in the S2–S4 group.

3.3. Comparison of Serological Indicators

The serum IVC and LN levels were notably lower in the S1 group than in the S2–S4 group (), as presented in Table 2.

3.4. Imaging Data of Different LF Stages

Imaging data of different LF stages are shown in Figure 2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.5. Spearman Correlation Analysis between fECV and Serological Indicators

The Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that the serum IVC and LN levels were positively correlated with fECV (r₁ = 0.803 and r₂ = 0.890; ) (See Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

3.6. Clinical Efficacy of fECV in the Diagnosis of LF at Each Stage

The fECV had the highest specificity and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of S1 and had the highest sensitivity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of S2–S4. Details are presented in Table 3 and Figure 4.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

4. Discussion

Liver fibrosis (LF), a compensatory repair reaction after liver injury and a process of dynamic pathological changes, can cause cirrhosis or liver failure with disease progression, increasing the prevalence of liver malignant tumors [10, 11]. A clinical study [12] has shown that early diagnosis and treatment are of great significance to restore the structure and function of damaged liver tissues due to the potential reversibility of LF and cirrhosis. The pathological examination of liver biopsy has many disadvantages such as pneumothorax and puncture pain, resulting in poor clinical compliance [13, 14]. The extensive clinical application of contrast-enhanced CT diagnostic techniques enables the common use of contrast agents, followed by wide attention of physicians on the adverse reactions of high radiation and contrast agents. High radiation doses will cause long-term adverse effects on high-sensitive organs such as the thyroid, thereby increasing the risk of iatrogenic renal failure. With the advantages of low dose and low radiation, the double-low DCE-CT technology not only effectively reduces the damage of the high-dose X-ray radiation caused by scanning but also markedly reduces the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy caused by the injection of high-dose contrast agents [15], which has been confirmed in diseases such as pulmonary embolism and solitary pulmonary nodules [16, 17]. In this study, the double-low DCE-CT diagnostic technique could not only obtain the perfusion information of the lesions but also comprehensively evaluate the overall morphology and blood supply of the liver lesions. At the same time, double-low DCE-CT could obtain the CT images of the routine phase through the AIDR technology, with the image quality qualified for imaging diagnosis. Meanwhile, the implementation of CT scanning could also obtain the quantitative analysis of LF while detecting liver cancer or localized lesions of the liver, which enabled easier calculation of the fECV values without a lot of postprocessing time [18–20]. The combination of low-dose imaging, morphology, and molecular imaging provides a broad space for the accurate diagnosis of LF and cirrhosis.

Based on the previous theoretical research, the patients with LF and cirrhosis who underwent liver biopsy and multiphase DCE-CT of the liver at the same time in our hospital were selected as the research subjects in this study to explore the clinical application advantages of the study protocol through the detection of CT parameters and fECV values and bring the best scheme for patients. This study showed obvious differences in the fECV values measured by CT among patients at different LF stages and increased fECV values with the aggravation of the disease. In addition, fECV has a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for different LF stages. Compared with the plain CT scan, the contrast agents of the double-low DCE-CT scan after injection can freely enter and exit the blood vessels and cells [21] and finally reach a state of equilibrium. In addition, using the obtained fECV to evaluate LF is of application value for patients with contraindications to ultrasound or MRI [20], and CT determination of fECV can cover the whole liver (including the left lobe of the liver) of the subject [22], which greatly increases the accuracy of clinical diagnosis. The experimental results are better than those of Wu et al. [23]. In this study, the internal lesions of patients at each stage were better observed with the LF imaging data, so as to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of the disease. At the same time, with good visual effects, the imaging technology not only obtains the perfusion information of the lesions but also comprehensively evaluates the whole morphology and blood vessels of the liver lesions, which greatly meets the needs of clinical diagnosis. This study also found that fECV did not have the highest accuracy and specificity in the diagnosis of stage S2–4, so patients at this stage are suggested to be evaluated with the addition of other methods in order to achieve more ideal diagnostic efficacy. Many studies have shown that CT has obvious advantages in the diagnosis and evaluation of early LF, which will facilitate early clinical intervention to reduce the incidence of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer [24, 25]. The main contribution of this study lies in that the double-low DCE-CT and fECV can facilitate a better diagnosis of LF, which is a breakthrough in traditional diagnostic techniques and has extensive guiding significance in the diagnosis of liver diseases. This undoubtedly will become the development direction of future medicine. Of course, this study also has some shortcomings, such as the unevenly distributed number of cases in each stage and the small sample size. In addition, this study only investigates the serum IVC and LN levels of patients, lacking representativeness, which affects the results to some extent. Although continuous progress has been made in modern medical diagnosis and treatment technology, there are still many difficulties in the diagnosis of LF. Therefore, more efforts should be made to explore more efficient diagnostic techniques, optimize the current diagnostic modes, and provide more reliable data for the diagnosis of LF.

In conclusion, the quantitative analysis of the liver extracellular matrix volume of double-low DCE-CT is a promising research field, and its development further improves the accuracy and specificity of the diagnosis of liver diseases, which also provides a reliable basis for clinicians to formulate and adjust treatment plans in a timely manner.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Zhangjiakou Science and Technology Research and Development Plan Project, grant number 1911021D-5.

References

G. Montazeri, N. Rohban, M. Sotoudeh, and S. Massarrat, “Abdominal ultrasound combined with laboratory tests as a reliable, easily accessible and cost-effective way of assessing the stages of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis,” Archives of Iranian Medicine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 118–123, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, W. Ding, J. Liu et al., “Association of coexistent hepatitis B surface antigen and antibody with severe liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B,” JAMA Network Open, vol. 5, no. 6, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. T. Yan, L. Wang, J. Yao et al., “Total bile acid-to-cholesterol ratio as a novel noninvasive marker for significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with non-cholestatic chronic hepatitis B virus infection,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 99, no. 8, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chen and T. Jiang, “Preoperative noninvasive assessment for liver fibrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with chronic hepatitis B: comparison of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography with serum liver fibrosis models,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 133, Article ID 109386, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ginès, L. Castera, F. Lammert et al., “Population screening for liver fibrosis: toward early diagnosis and intervention for chronic liver diseases,” Hepatology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 219–228, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. U. Kim, M. Y. Jeon, and T. S. Lim, “Diagnostic performance of serum asialo-α1-acid glycoprotein for advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Korean Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 341–348, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ji, G. Chen, J. C. Wang et al., “Identification of TAF1, HNF4A, and CALM2 as potential therapeutic target genes for liver fibrosis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 234, no. 6, pp. 9045–9051, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Vitellius, A. Paisant, A. Lannes et al., “Liver fibrosis staging by computed tomography: prospective randomized multicentric evaluation of image analyses,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 46, no. 2, Article ID 101797, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Medical Association, “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects,” JAMA, vol. 310, no. 20, pp. 2191–2194, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Xu, N. M. Zhou, W. T. Cao, and X. J. Li, “Evaluation of elastography combined with serological indexes for hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 37, pp. 4272–4280, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Z. Yang, A. W. Gen, J. C. Xian, and L. Xiao, “Diagnostic value of various noninvasive indexes in the diagnosis of chronic hepatic fibrosis,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 479–485, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Lubner, D. Jones, J. Kloke, A. Said, and P. J. Pickhardt, British Journal of Radiology, vol. 92, no. 1093, Article ID 20180153, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site
A. Yamamoto, K. Ito, K. Yasokawa et al., “Morphologic changes in hepatitis virus-related liver cirrhosis: relationship to hemodynamics of portal vein on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT,” Radiography, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 598–604, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Morita, A. Nishie, Y. Ushijima et al., “Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by dual-layer spectral detector CT,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 136, Article ID 109575, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Shin, J. A. Choi, J. M. Choi et al., “Sclerotic changes of cavernous hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver: long-term follow-up using dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography,” La radiologia medica, vol. 125, no. 12, pp. 1225–1232, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Lange, K. J. Thrane, K. S. Thomassen et al., “Hepatic magnetic resonance T1-mapping and extracellular volume fraction compared to shear-wave elastography in pediatric Fontan-associated liver disease,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 66–76, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yeung, B. Ganeshan, R. Endozo et al., “Equilibrium CT texture analysis for the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis: preliminary evaluation against histopathology and extracellular volume fraction,” Journal of Personalized Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 46, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Kupczyk, N. Mesropyan, A. Isaak et al., “Quantitative MRI of the liver: evaluation of extracellular volume fraction and other quantitative parameters in comparison to MR elastography for the assessment of hepatopathy,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 77, pp. 7–13, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bak, J. E. Kim, K. Bae et al., “Quantification of liver extracellular volume using dual-energy CT: utility for prediction of liver-related events in cirrhosis,” European Radiology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 5317–5326, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Luetkens, S. Klein, F. Träber et al., “Quantification of liver fibrosis: extracellular volume fraction using an MRI bolus-only technique in a rat animal model,” European Radiology Experimental, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 22, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Luetkens, S. Klein, F. Traber et al., “Quantification of liver fibrosis at T1 and T2 mapping with extracellular volume fraction MRI: preclinical results,” Radiology, vol. 288, no. 3, pp. 748–754, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Luetkens, S. Klein, F. Traeber et al., “Quantitative liver MRI including extracellular volume fraction for non-invasive quantification of liver fibrosis: a prospective proof-of-concept study,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 593-594, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wu, B. Ning, J. Yang, Y. Chen, C. Zhang, and Y. Yan, “Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis and liver fibrosis by artificial intelligence algorithm-based multislice spiral computed tomography,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2022, pp. 1–8, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Lange, M. J. E. Reichert, J. J. Pagano et al., “Increased extracellular volume in the liver of pediatric Fontan patients,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 39, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Zhandong Liang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

223

Downloads

355

Citations