Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2012, Article ID 167021, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/167021
Research Article

The Height Gain in Scoliotic Deformity Correction: Assessed by New Predictive Formula

1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe Central Campus, 41380 Umuttepe, Kocaeli, Turkey
2Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Midyat State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey
3Physics Department, Art and Science Faculty, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey

Received 19 January 2012; Revised 25 February 2012; Accepted 14 March 2012

Academic Editor: Hugo Palmans

Copyright © 2012 Ahmet Yılmaz Şarlak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. A. F. Stokes, “Stature and growth compensation for spinal curvature,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 140, pp. 48–51, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Bjure and A. Nachemson, “Non-treated scoliosis,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 93, pp. 44–52, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  3. K. R. Brookenthal, “Loss of height in scoliosis due to degree of curvature,” in Proceedings of the 15th Conference of Scoliosis Research Society, 2002.
  4. M. Ylikoski, “Height of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,” European Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 288–291, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. R. Kuklo, B. K. Potter, T. M. Schroeder, and M. F. O'Brien, “Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1240–1246, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. A. Archer and R. A. Dickson, “Stature and idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 185–188, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. J. Adam, M. T. Izatt, J. R. Harvey, and G. N. Askin, “Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 1664–1669, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. De Carvalho, R. Vialle, L. Thomsen et al., “Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30-90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?” European Spine Journal, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1615–1620, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. G. Shea, P. M. Stevens, M. Nelson, J. T. Smith, K. S. Masters, and S. Yandow, “A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles,” Spine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 551–555, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. A. F. Stokes and D. D. Aronsson, “Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of king classification and cobb angle measurement of scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 665–670, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. P. D. Wills, J. D. Auerbach, X. Zhu et al., “Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition,” Spine, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 98–105, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. ROAF, “Vertebral growth and its mechanical control.,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. British, vol. 42, pp. 40–59, 1960. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus