Research Article

The Height Gain in Scoliotic Deformity Correction: Assessed by New Predictive Formula

Table 2

Variable and measured data of the patients who were chosen from the study group to find “ ” value.

NumberAgeGenderCurve typeFusion levelNPreop. Cobb (°)Preop. AVT (mm)h1 (mm)Postop. Cobb (°)Postop. AVT (mm)h2 (mm)H1 (mm) (mm)Stokes1 (mm)Simplified (mm) (mm) -Stokes1 (mm)Intervert. disc lengthening (“k” value)

(5)14M1AT3–L11143.751.438.156.510.10.0238.1334.3716.6834.793013.321.21
(9)13F5CT11–L4637.649.624.390.68.8−3.3827.7727.5512.5224.593017.482.91
(13)20F1AT4–T11838.038.826.775.45.9−0.0726.8424.2212.7424.482512.261.53
(19)18F1BT6-L41145.353.039.066.20.00.0039.0635.5917.8735.993517.131.56
(22)21F1CT4–T11842.824.024.273.71.10.0024.2722.6816.0222.874023.983.00
(23)14F1BT5–T11739.638.024.666.50.00.0024.6622.0213.7822.333016.222.32
(24)20F1CT4-L31246.210.130.295.00.00.0030.2927.3018.6127.383516.391.37
(28)15F5CT5-L51352.153.245.900.00.00.0045.9045.9023.5646.263511.440.88
(30)12M1AT4–T11842.720.323.365.00.00.0023.3621.2115.9821.373519.022.38
(35)14F5CT9-L4850.345.931.690.00.00.0031.6931.6921.9132.014018.092.26
(36)24F1AT5-L31140.347.136.110.00.00.0036.1136.1114.2536.494025.752.34

Mean16.89.443.539.231.333.52.4−0.3131.6429.8816.7229.8734.0917.372.0