Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2013, Article ID 165913, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/165913
Research Article

Assessment of Parturition with Cervical Light-Induced Fluorescence and Uterine Electromyography

1Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slajmerjeva 3, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Downtown Campus at TGen, 445 N 5th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA

Received 29 May 2013; Revised 15 August 2013; Accepted 20 August 2013

Academic Editor: Brynjar Karlsson

Copyright © 2013 Miha Lucovnik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. L. McPheeters, W. C. Miller, K. E. Hartmann et al., “The epidemiology of threatened preterm labor: a prospective cohort study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 192, no. 4, pp. 1325–1330, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. A. Janssen, C. E. Iker, and E. A. Carty, “Early labour assessment and support at home: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 734–741, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. D. Iams and R. Romero, “Preterm birth,” in Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, S. G. Gabbe, J. R. Niebyl, and J. L. Simpson, Eds., pp. 668–712, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 5th edition, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. T. A. Bennett, M. Kotelchuck, C. E. Cox, M. J. Tucker, and D. A. Nadeau, “Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States in 1991 and 1992: a comprehensive view of maternal morbidity,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 346–354, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Lucovnik, R. L. Chambliss, and R. E. Garfield, “Costs of unnecessary admissions and treatments for ‘threatened preterm labor’,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 1–3, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  6. R. E. Garfield, W. L. Maner, L. Shi, S. Q. Shi, and G. R. Saade, “Uterine EMG and cervical LIF—promising technologies in obstetrics,” Current Women's Health Reviews, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 207–221, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Buhimschi, M. B. Boyle, G. R. Saade, and R. E. Garfield, “Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 811–822, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Buhimschi and R. E. Garfield, “Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 744–753, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Léman, C. Marque, and J. Gondry, “Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1222–1229, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. Verdenik, M. Pajntar, and B. Leskošek, “Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Garfield, G. Saade, C. Buhimschi et al., “Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 673–695, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. C. Jacod, E. M. Graatsma, E. Van Hagen, and G. H. A. Visser, “A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Jezewski, K. Horoba, A. Matonia, and J. Wrobel, “Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 753–767, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Rabotti, M. Mischi, J. O. E. H. van Laar, G. S. Oei, and J. W. M. Bergmans, “Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 829–841, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Maul, W. L. Maner, G. Olson, G. R. Saade, and R. E. Garfield, “Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 297–301, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. L. Maner, R. E. Garfield, H. Maul, G. Olson, and G. Saade, “Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1254–1260, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Buhimschi, M. B. Boyle, and R. E. Garfield, “Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. K. Marque, J. Terrien, S. Rihana, and G. Germain, “Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 7, supplement 1, article S5, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Lucovnik, W. L. Maner, L. R. Chambliss et al., “Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 228.e1–228.e10, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. C. Leppert, “Anatomy and physiology of cervical ripening,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 38, pp. 267–279, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  21. W. Rath, R. Ismers, B. C. Adelmann-Grill, H. W. Stuhlsatz, M. Szevereny, and W. Kuhn, “Biochemical changes in human cervical connective tissue after intracervical application of prostaglandin E2,” Prostaglandins, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 375–384, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. L. Holcomb Jr. and J. S. Smeltzer, “Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 43–45, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Gomez, M. Galasso, R. Romero et al., “Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 171, no. 4, pp. 956–964, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. D. Iams, R. L. Goldenberg, P. J. Meis et al., “The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 334, no. 9, pp. 567–572, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Tsoi, I. B. Fuchs, S. Rane, L. Geerts, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Sonographic measurement of cervical length in threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 353–356, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. I. Fuchs, E. Tsoi, W. Henrich, J. W. Dudenhausen, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Sonographic measurement of cervical length in twin pregnancies in threatened preterm labor,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 42–45, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. D. Iams, “Prediction and early detection of preterm labor,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 402–412, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Schlembach, L. Mackay, L. Shi, W. L. Maner, R. E. Garfield, and H. Maul, “Cervical ripening and insufficiency: from biochemical and molecular studies to in vivo clinical examination,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 144, supplement 1, pp. S70–S76, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Tezuka, M. Ali, K. Chwalisz, and R. E. Garfield, “Changes in transcripts encoding calcium channel subunits of rat myometrium during pregnancy,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 269, no. 4, pp. C1008–C1017, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. R. Fuchs, F. Fuchs, P. Husslein, and M. S. Soloff, “Oxytocin receptors in the human uterus during pregnancy and parturition,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 734–741, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Balducci, B. Risek, N. B. Gilula, A. Hand, J. F. X. Egan, and A. M. Vintzileos, “Gap junction formation in human myometrium: a key to preterm labor?” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 168, no. 5, pp. 1609–1615, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. E. Garfield, M. G. Blennerhassett, and S. M. Miller, “Control of myometrial contractility: role and regulation of gap junctions,” Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology, vol. 10, pp. 436–490, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. K. Freeman, “Problems with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation and patient management,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 813–826, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. M. Peaceman, W. W. Andrews, J. M. Thorp et al., “Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicenter trial,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. D. Iams, R. B. Newman, E. A. Thom et al., “Frequency of uterine contractions and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 4, pp. 250–255, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Lucovnik, R. J. Kuon, L. R. Chambliss et al., “Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 150–157, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Shi, S.-Q. Shi, G. R. Saade, K. Chwalisz, and R. E. Garfield, “Changes in cervical resistance and collagen fluorescence during gestation in rats,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 188–194, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. P. Durnwald, C. D. Lynch, H. Walker, and J. D. Iams, “The effect of treatment with 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on changes in cervical length over time,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 201, no. 4, pp. 410.e1–410.e5, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Lucovnik, Z. Novak-Antolic, and R. E. Garfield, “Use of non-invasive uterine electromyography in the diagnosis of preterm labour,” Facts, Views & Vision in Obgyn, vol. 4, pp. 66–72, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  40. J. A. Martin, B. E. Hamilton, S. J. Ventura et al., “Final data for 2010, National vital statistics reports, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md, USA, 2012,” http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_01.pdf.
  41. EURO-PERISTAT Project, European Perinatal Health Report, 2010, http://www.europeristat.com/.
  42. J. M. Belizán, F. Althabe, and M. L. Cafferata, “Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates,” Epidemiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 485–486, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Y. Spong, V. Berghella, K. D. Wenstrom, B. M. Mercer, and G. R. Saade, “Preventing the first cesarean delivery,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 120, pp. 1181–1193, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  44. L. M. Harper, A. B. Caughey, A. O. Obido, K. A. Roehl, and Q. Zhao, “Normal progress of induced labor,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 119, pp. 1113–1118, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  45. D. J. Rouse, S. J. Weiner, S. L. Bloom et al., “Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 267–272, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. C. Klein, A. Kelly, J. Kaczorowski, and S. Grzybowski, “The effect of family physician timing of maternal admission on procedures in labour and maternal and infant morbidity,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 641–645, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. E. Hemminki and R. Simukka, “The timing of hospital admission and progress of labour,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 85–94, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Holmes, L. W. Oppenheimer, and S. Wu Wen, “The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 1120–1124, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus