Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2013, Article ID 170120, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/170120
Research Article

Validation Study Methods for Estimating Odds Ratio in Tables When Exposure is Misclassified

1Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 7134845794, Iran
2Department of Biostatistics, Infertility Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 7134845794, Iran

Received 27 September 2013; Revised 27 November 2013; Accepted 30 November 2013

Academic Editor: Edelmira Valero

Copyright © 2013 Bijan Nouri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Bross, “Misclassification in 2×2 tables,” Biometrics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 478–486, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  2. I. D. J. Bross, “Spurious effects from an extraneous variable,” Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 637–647, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Cornfield, W. Haenszel, E. C. Hammond, A. M. Lillienfeld, M. B. Shimkin, and E. L. Wynder, “Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 22, pp. 173–203, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. G. Koch, “The effect of non-sampling errors on measures of association in 2×2 contingency tables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 64, no. 327, pp. 852–863, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Tenenbein, “A double sampling scheme for estimating from binomial data with misclassifications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 65, no. 331, pp. 1350–1361, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. A. Barron, “The effects of misclassification on the estimation of relative risk,” Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 414–418, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Greenland and D. Kleinbaum, “Correcting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 93–97, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Greenland, “Variance estimation for epidemiologic effect estimates under misclassification,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 745–757, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Selen, “Adjusting for errors in classification and measurement in the analysis of partly and purely categorical data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 81, no. 393, pp. 75–81, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. J. Marshall, “Validation study methods for estimating exposure proportions and odds ratios with misclassified data,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 941–947, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. J. Morrissey and D. Spiegelman, “Matrix methods for estimating odds ratios with misclassified exposure data: extensions and comparisons,” Biometrics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 338–344, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O. Davidov, D. Faraggi, and B. Reiser, “Misclassification in logistic regression with discrete covariates,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 541–553, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. X. Liu and K.-Y. Liang, “Adjustment for non-differential misclassification error in the generalized linear model,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1197–1211, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Luan, W. Pan, S. G. Gerberich, and B. P. Carlin, “Does it always help to adjust for misclassification of a binary outcome in logistics regression?” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 2221–2234, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. S. Magder and J. P. Hughes, “Logistic regression when the outcome is measured with uncertainty,” The American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. J. Carroll, D. Ruppert, L. A. Stefanski, and C. M. Crainiceanu, Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  17. H. Chu, Z. Wang, S. R. Cole, and S. Greenland, “Sensitivity analysis of misclassification: a graphical and a Bayesian approach,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 834–841, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Greenland, “Maximum-likelihood and closed-form estimators of epidemiologic measures under misclassification,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 528–538, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. H. Lyles, “A note on estimating crude odds ratios in case-control studies with differentially misclassified exposure,” Biometrics, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1034–1037, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. H. Lyles and J. Lin, “Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 29, no. 22, pp. 2297–2309, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. M. Jurek, S. Greenland, and G. Maldonado, “Brief report: how far from non-differential does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias measures of association away from the null?” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 382–385, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. F. Kraus, S. Greenland, and M. Bulterys, “Risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome in the US collaborative perinatal project,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus