Review Article

Automated Bone Age Assessment: Motivation, Taxonomies, and Challenges

Table 2

Comparison of accuracy (error rate) between automated approaches in BAA.

NumberComparison of error rate in years
MethodError rate

1Mansourvar et al. [78]Error rate is about 0.170625 years
2Thodberg et al. [77]0.42 years for using the GP method and 0.80 years for using the TW2 method
3Hill and Pynsent [74]Error rate is about 0.5 years
4Rucci et al. [73]Error rate is about 0.7 years
5Mahmoodi et al. [70]Bone age accuracies of % for males and % for females
6Hsien et al. [69]The accuracy was evaluated to be
7Pietka et al. [67]Error rate is roughly 1 year