Review Article
Automated Bone Age Assessment: Motivation, Taxonomies, and Challenges
Table 2
Comparison of accuracy (error rate) between automated approaches in BAA.
| Number | Comparison of error rate in years | Method | Error rate |
| 1 | Mansourvar et al. [78] | Error rate is about 0.170625 years
| 2 | Thodberg et al. [77] | 0.42 years for using the GP method and 0.80 years for using the TW2 method | 3 | Hill and Pynsent [74] | Error rate is about 0.5 years
| 4 | Rucci et al. [73] | Error rate is about 0.7 years | 5 | Mahmoodi et al. [70] | Bone age accuracies of % for males and % for females | 6 | Hsien et al. [69] | The accuracy was evaluated to be | 7 | Pietka et al. [67] | Error rate is roughly 1 year |
|
|