Table 4: Performance comparison of different procedures for the leukemia study.

MethodsNo. of genesTesting error rateTesting accuracy

Bayesian -prior60.0588 (2/34)0.9412 (32/34)
Bayesian -prior100.0588 (2/34)0.9412 (32/34)
Bayesian -prior140.0588 (2/34)0.9412 (32/34)
Weighted voting machinea500.1471 (5/34)0.8529 (29/34)
MAVE-LDb500.0294 (1/34)0.9706 (33/34)
Two-step EBMc320.1471 (5/34)0.8529 (29/34)
Two-step EBMc2560.0588 (2/34)0.9412 (32/34)
Two-step EBMc5120.0294 (1/34)0.9706 (33/34)
KIGP + PKd200.0588 (2/34)0.9412 (32/34)
-test + probit regression60.1765 (6/34)0.8235 (28/34)
-test + probit regression100.0882 (3/34)0.9118 (31/34)
-test + probit regression140.1176 (4/34)0.8824 (30/34)

Proposed by Gloub et al. [36].
bProposed by Antoniadis et al. [43].
cProposed by Ji et al. [47].
dProposed by Zhao and Cheung [48].