Dynamics of High-Risk Nonvaccine Human Papillomavirus Types after Actual Vaccination Scheme

Peralta, Raúl; Vargas-De-León, Cruz; Cabrera, Augusto; Miramontes, Pedro

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/542923

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Model Formulation Discussion and Conclusions Appendix Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 542923 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/542923

Dynamics of High-Risk Nonvaccine Human Papillomavirus Types after Actual Vaccination Scheme

Raúl Peralta,^1,2Cruz Vargas-De-León,^3,4Augusto Cabrera,¹and Pedro Miramontes^1,2

Academic Editor: Edelmira Valero

Received01 Jan 2014

Accepted07 Mar 2014

Published03 Apr 2014

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified as the main etiological factor in the developing of cervical cancer (CC). This finding has propitiated the development of vaccines that help to prevent the HPVs 16 and 18 infection. Both genotypes are associated with 70% of CC worldwide. In the present study, we aimed to determine the emergence of high-risk nonvaccine HPV after actual vaccination scheme to estimate the impact of the current HPV vaccines. A SIR-type model was used to study the HPV dynamics after vaccination. According to the results, our model indicates that the application of the vaccine reduces infection by target or vaccine genotypes as expected. However, numerical simulations of the model suggest the presence of the phenomenon called vaccine—induced pathogen strain replacement. Here, we report the following replacement mechanism: if the effectiveness of cross-protective immunity is not larger than the effectiveness of the vaccine, then the high-risk nonvaccine genotypes emerge. In this scenario, further studies of infection dispersion by HPV are necessary to ascertain the real impact of the current vaccines, primarily because of the different high-risk HPV types that are found in CC.

1. Introduction

SIR (susceptible, infected, and recovered) mathematical models are widely used to improve the understanding of disease dynamics [1]. These models usually include some epidemiological factors involved in the development of a disease, such as transmission rate and recovery, and in the case of infectious diseases, they incorporate the control schemes such as the application of prophylactic vaccines [2]. These models divide the population into susceptible, infected, and recovered classes and, in the case of sexually transmitted diseases, also consider the exposed class, which are those individuals who have had contact with the infectious agent but have not yet acquired the infection. With these factors or parameters, it is possible to build a mathematical SIR type model that allows us to predict the disease dynamics.

The use of SIR models in the study of the dynamics of infection by human papillomavirus (HPV) has helped to the understanding of the impact of vaccination schemes against oncogenic HPVs 16 and 18 infection and warts causing genital HPVs 6 and 11 types [3, 4]. A previous model [3, 4] studied HPV infection, disease progression, cervical cancer (CC) screening, treatment, vaccine characteristics, vaccination strategies, and the impact of HPV quadrivalent vaccination on epidemiological and economic outcomes within a US population. The main benefit is the reduction of HPVs 16, 18, 6, and 11 infection as expected. Consistent with these results reported for the US population, data from an analysis suggest that a quadrivalent HPV vaccine can yield substantial benefits in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and genital warts in Mexico [4].

HPV is the main etiological factor for the development of cervical lesions and CC. The epidemiological evidences concluded that nearly 70% of CC could be attributed to HPV 16 (nearly 60%) and HPV 18 (nearly 10%). The associations with these HPV types are consistent in all studies and countries for CC. However, HPV genotypes are highly diverse; so far, nearly 150 HPVs have been described and more than 40 genotypes infect the anogenital tract. For twelve, there is sufficient evidence of their carcinogenicity; that is, they have the capacity to lead to cell transformation (HPVs 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59) and have been classified as high-risk (hr) or carcinogenic to humans, while HPV types 6 and 11 are classified as low-risk (lr) or not classifiable as to their carcinogenicity to humans, causing benign epithelial proliferations [5]. Collectively, hr nontarget or nonvaccine HPVs contribute with nearly 30% of CC worldwide [6]. In this context, with the inclusion of a second generation of vaccines that protect against hr nonvaccine HPVs, it could protect almost entirely from the CC [5].

CC is the second most common cancer in women worldwide and the HPV infection is the major etiological factor for the development of this tumor. This infection is the most common sexually transmitted disease among sexually active men and women worldwide, and it has been estimated that at least 50% of sexually active individuals have had a genital HPV infection [7]. The prevalence of HPV infection varies worldwide, being higher in developing countries [6]. In clinically healthy Mexican women, the prevalence of HPV infection is 15% [8], a percentage similar to that found in other developing countries [6, 9, 10] and the prevalence of HPVs 16 and 18 infection in CC is 71% (63% for HPV 16 and 8% for HPV 18), while the prevalence of HPV infection with other genotypes is 25%, highlighting the hr HPVs 31 and 58 as the most frequent (5% for each type) [8]. In 2008, an estimated number of 5,061 Mexican women died as result of CC, making it one of the major causes of death in Mexican women [11]. It is expected that current vaccines directed against HPVs 16 and 18 will reduce the overall incidence of CC.

However, these vaccines could modulate positively the prevalence of infections with different genotypes through a replacement of viral genotype, which could lead to an increase in the prevalence of hr nonvaccine HPVs after actual vaccination scheme [12, 13]. In some studies, it has been reported that the vaccine could confer cross-protective immunity against related genotypes which would lead to a decrease in the transmission of these hr nonvaccine HPVs [13], but, on the other hand, the removal of some HPVs (HPVs 16 and 18 or vaccine HPVs) as the result of vaccination may result in a positive selection pressure with other hr HPVs or hr nonvaccine HPV types, leading to an increase in transmission of the latter. This phenomenon, known as vaccine-induced pathogenic strain replacement, was previously described in a vaccination program against other pathogens [14]. Such was the case of Streptococcus pneumoniæ in which the vaccine, directed against seven serotypes, resulted in an increase of other serotypes [15]. HPVs are highly stable DNA viruses; thus selective pressures from vaccination may vacate existing ecological niches currently taken by HPVs 16 and 18 [16].

In this study a mathematical SIR type model to predict the dynamic of hr nonvaccine HPVs infection after actual vaccination scheme is proposed. Thus, the identification of emerging high risk genotypes of nonvaccine HPVs must be incorporated into a second generation vaccine to cover a broader spectrum of HPV infection associated with CC.

2. Model Formulation

Our model considers two genotypes, one that includes high-risk 16 and 18 genotypes or hr-vaccine-type HPV and one which includes high-risk 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59 genotypes or hr-nonvaccine-type HPV.

The total population at time , denoted by , is subdivided into mutually exclusive compartments for individuals that are unvaccinated susceptible (), vaccinated susceptible (), infected with vaccine-type HPV () and infected with nonvaccine-type HPV () so that

The unvaccinated susceptible population increases by the recruitment of new sexually active individuals (assumed susceptible) into the population (at a rate ) and the loss of protection of the vaccine (at a rate ). This population diminishes by “sexual death” (at a rate ), vaccination of new sexually active individuals (at a rate ), and the acquisition of HPV infections with nonvaccine genotypes and nonvaccine genotypes, following effective contact with infectious individuals (in the and classes), at rates and , respectively, where are the force of infection and and are the effective contact rates. Putting the above assumptions and definitions together gives the following equation for the rate of change of the unvaccinated susceptible population:

The population of vaccinated susceptible individuals () increases due to the vaccination of new sexually active individuals (at the rate ). Further, this population diminishes by the “sexual death” (at the rate ), rate at which the vaccine wanes , and the acquisition of HPV infections with vaccine genotypes and nonvaccine genotypes at rates and , respectively, where are the force of infection and and are the effective contact rates. The vaccine has the effect of reducing the force of infection by a factor of , so that means the vaccine is completely effective in preventing HPV infection with vaccine genotypes. Thus is the vaccine efficacy. Some reports indicate that the vaccination confers partial cross-protective immunity to nonvaccine genotypes [13]. Partial cross-protective immunity is explored in terms of relative susceptibility to infection with nonvaccine genotypes, where can be any value between zero and one (). For example, a value of can be interpreted as 20% protection against infection with nonvaccine genotypes for vaccinated sexually active individuals. Thus,

The population of individuals infected with vaccine-type HPV is generated by the infection of unvaccinated susceptible individuals (at the rate ) and vaccinated susceptible individuals (at the rate ). It is reduced by the development of cervical cancer associated with vaccine-type HPV infection (at a rate ) and by natural recovery rate (at a rate ) and “sexual death” (at a rate ). By letting , equation can be represented as

The population of individuals infected with nonvaccine-type HPV is generated by the infection of unvaccinated susceptible individuals (at the rate ) and the infection of vaccinated susceptible individuals with nontarget genotype is produced at a rate . It is reduced by the development of cervical cancer associated with nonvaccine-type HPV infection (at a rate ) and by natural recovery rate (at a rate ) and “sexual death” (at a rate ). By letting , equation can be represented as

Thus, the basic model for the transmission dynamics of HPV in a population is given by the following system of nonlinear differential equations:

We assume that all parameters are positive except which is nonnegative. Set the initial condition of system (8) as follows: , , , and .

3. Local Stability of HPV-Free Equilibrium and Numerical Simulations

The system (8) always has the HPV-free equilibrium , where The vaccine reproduction number for the hr-vaccine-type HPV is This reproductive number is the average number of secondary HPV infected individuals produced by each infected individual with hr-vaccine-type HPV.

Similarly, we now define the vaccine reproduction number for the hr-nonvaccine-type HPV:

Remark 1. Under the following restrictions on the parameters and , we note that if the vaccine efficacy is greater than the efficacy of partial cross-protective immunity then . it is epidemiologically feasible that .

We now study the local stability behavior of the HPV-free equilibrium for system (8). The local stability follows by analyzing the Jacobian matrix where

The eigenvalues of are and , and

The eigenvalues and are negative if and only if and . Therefore is locally asymptotically stable for and and unstable otherwise. Then we have the following theorem.

Theorem 2. If and , is locally asymptotically stable and unstable otherwise.

Based on the literature and our estimations, we consider a set of parameter values that may represent a plausible scenario, although they are not necessarily realistic as a whole. We assume that the time unit is year and estimate the parameters as follows.(i)Recruitment rate, . As reported in [17, 18] the recruitment rate of new sexually active individuals is year⁻¹.(ii)Sexual activity period, . If we assume that the sexually active period of healthy individuals lies between 15 and 30 years [19], so that we take year⁻¹.(iii)Vaccination rate, . The proportion of vaccinated new sexually active individuals (cohort vaccination) is year⁻¹ [18, 20].(iv)Loss rate of vaccine efficacy, . The duration of vaccine protection is unknown. However recent studies show that the vaccine induces a strong immune response, with high and sustained levels of IgG and neutralizing antibodies against HPV-16/18 up to 7.3 years [21]. Studies expect protection to continue for many more years, so that we take year⁻¹.(v)Contact rate, . This parameter is given by , where is the average number of sexual contacts per person and is the probability of successful HPV infection. As reported in [17, 18], the average number of sexual contacts per person is two, 2 , and . Hence we take year⁻¹. We will assume that contact rates are equal.(vi)Vaccine efficacy, . The efficacy of the vaccine may range from 90% to 100% [3, 22], so that we take . Hence the value of is .(vii)Partial cross-protective immunity, . We choose, , that is to say, 20% protection against infection with nonvaccine genotypes for vaccinated sexually active individuals.

Furthermore, we will assume that and are equal. We take year⁻¹ (which means that 16 years are estimated as the average residence time in the infected class.)

Choosing these values, the reproductive numbers are as follows: . Three equilibrium points were calculated for the epidemic model (8). One equilibrium occurred when , , and , which we call HPV-free equilibrium . The other equilibrium points are the hr-vaccine-type HPV equilibrium and the hr-nonvaccine-type HPV equilibrium

The HPV-free equilibrium and the hr-vaccine-type HPV equilibrium are unstable, and the hr-nonvaccine-type HPV equilibrium is locally stable, as determined by the Jacobian matrix of the system (8) at an equilibrium (see Appendix). In Figure 1 the time evolution of the populations is plotted. It is shown that the equilibrium is asymptotically stable.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

It is already known that persistent hr HPV infection is widely associated with the development of CC [5]. This finding has propitiated the development of vaccines that help to prevent this infection. Particularly, epidemiological studies show that hr HPVs 16 and 18 infections are associated with 70% of CC worldwide. In contrast, the hr HPVs (31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59) infections are associated with nearly 30% of CC. These findings suggest a molecular mechanism involved in the cellular transformation mediated by hr HPV infection, on one hand, a group of highly oncogenic hr HPV and, on the other, a group of fewer oncogenic hr HPV. This observation supports previous strategies to prevent this infection, mediated by application of prophylactic vaccines.

SIR are currently being used to determine the reduction of this infection by the effect of the vaccine [22]. Such models explain the reduction of infection with hr HPVs 16 and 18 included as targets of the vaccine [4, 22, 23]. Hence the universal application of this vaccine has the potential to reduce the incidence of CC associated with this genotypes infection [23] and the decrease in HPVs 16 and 18 is also promising in terms of its potential impact on rates of anal, vulvae, and head and neck cancers because some of them are caused by one of these types [24]. Our model considers two genotypes: one that includes the hr HPVs 16 and 18 or vaccine HPV and other including hr HPVs 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59 or nonvaccine HPV. The numerical simulations of our model indicate that the application of the vaccine declines infection by target genotypes as expected. However, our results on dynamics of nonvaccine HPV types infection show the possible presence of a biological mechanism: vaccine-induced pathogenic strain replacement, for example, an increase in the prevalence of HPV genotypes not targeted by the vaccines due to an ecological niche created by a reduction in the prevalence of HPV genotypes targeted by the vaccines. According to the ecological notion, a population will expand its niche once another population is removed from a shared environment [25]. In this context, Murall, McCann, and Bauch developed an intrahost mathematical model that represents HPV coinfections in epithelial tissues and the immune response to infection. This study reported that a type replacement remains viable if nonvaccine targeted types that are not cross-reactive with the vaccine could spread to more patches (or tissues) and can increase their viral load in vaccinated host [25]. This observation is documented for various pathogens [13, 15], such as the immunization against Hæmophilus influenzæ serotype in the United States that resulted in the increase of serotype in the new cases of influenza [13]. This phenomenon is also present in other pathogens of bacterial origin [15]; for example, a significant increase in the prevalence of nonvaccine serotype occurred after introduction of a heptavalent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine and a Bordetella pertussis vaccine [26]. In this context, our mathematical model correctly predicts the emergence of viral genotypes nontarget of the vaccine similar to the aforementioned phenomenon.

In order to define a possible mechanism of vaccine-induced pathogenic strain replacement, we attempted to more comprehensively examine hr nonvaccine HPV dynamic using the SIR epidemiological model. Interestingly, the dynamic of vaccine HPV infection showed a decrease as expected; in contrast, the dynamic of hr nonvaccine HPV infection showed an increase after actual vaccination scheme. In this regard, some studies have described that the vaccine could reduce nonvaccine HPV infection by a mechanism of cross-immunity; this is due to the high similarity of sequences in the L1 region in hr HPV [13]. Based on these sequences, the hr HPVs are divided into the group A7 (which includes the 18, 39, 45, 51, and 68 genotypes) and A9 (which includes the 16, 31, 33, 35, 52, and 58 genotypes) [27]. These HPV groups contain almost all hr HPVs causing CC, hence to prevent these infections would have the effect of reducing the CC [27]. On the other hand, HPV vaccination is expected to provide herd protection, that is, to provide indirect protection to those who have not been vaccinated, due to a reduced prevalence of HPV in communities [28]. Based on the present study, we can suggest that only the reduction of the HPVs 16 and 18 infection is possible for the effectiveness of the vaccine (90–100%) [22]; however, there is not a reduction of hr nonvaccine HPVs.

In the context of HPV infection the following statements should be adopted: HPVs are highly stable DNA viruses; thus, selective pressure from vaccination may vacate existing ecological niches currently taken by HPVs 16 and 18 [16]. The high prevalence of HPV infection and frequency on concurrent infections with more than one type provides an opportunity for HPV type interactions [29]; vaccination cannot remove this infection but prevents potential future infection with vaccine-HPVs [16]. The HPV vaccination is likely to be beneficial to sexually active adult women as they are at risk of acquiring new HPV infection [30]. According to basic ecological principles, if competition exists between two or more different HPV types for niche occupation during natural infection, elimination of one type might lead to an increase in other types [31]. Epidemiologic approaches for evaluation of HPV type competition has been revised [31].

Here, we report an increased incidence of hr nonvaccine HPV after vaccination campaigns; the vaccine-induced pathogenic strain replacement occurs if the effectiveness of cross-protective immunity is not larger than the effectiveness of the vaccine (see Figures 2 and 3). In this scenario, further studies of spread infection by HPV are necessary to ascertain the real impact of the current vaccines, primarily because the different high risk HPV types are found in CC. According to the present analysis, a potential new-generation vaccine directed against groups A7 and A9 papillomavirus would protect more widely the population. This would provide optimal prevention of CC.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

Appendix

We explore the local stability of nonnegative equilibria of model (8) with the parameter values given in Section 3.

The HPV-free equilibrium always exists. The eigenvalues for the HPV-free equilibrium described by Jacobian matrix were

The presence of two positive eigenvalues then the HPV-free equilibrium is unstable.

Now we examine the local stability of hr-vaccine-type HPV equilibrium . Using Maple, the eigenvalues for the hr-vaccine-type HPV equilibrium described by Jacobian matrix were calculated to be The presence of a positive eigenvalue then the hr-vaccine-type HPV equilibrium is unstable.

Finally we examine the local stability of hr-nonvaccine-type HPV equilibrium . Using Maple, the eigenvalues for described by Jacobian matrix were calculated to be

The eigenvalues are negative; therefore is locally asymptotically stable.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

Raúl Peralta is thankful to the Postdoctoral fellowship from DGAPA, UNAM. The author also wishes to thank Dr. Mauricio Salcedo and Dr. Bruno Buonomo for their constructive comments and suggestions. The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers for improving this paper with their comments and suggestions.

References

W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, “Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics. I,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 115, pp. 700–721, 1927.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Gómez-Alcaraz and C. Vargas-De-León, “Modeling control strategies for influenza A H1N1 epidemics: SIR models,” Revista Mexicana de Física S, vol. 58, no. 137, 43 pages, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. H. Elbasha, E. J. Dasbach, and R. P. Insinga, “A multi-type HPV transmission model,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 2126–2176, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Insinga, E. J. Dasbach, and E. H. Elbasha, “Epidemiologic natural history and clinical management of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Disease: a critical and systematic review of the literature in the development of an HPV dynamic transmission model,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, article 119, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Bouvard, R. Baan, K. Straif et al., “A review of human carcinogens.Part B: biological agents,” The lancet Oncology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 321–322, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Li, S. Franceschi, R. Howell-Jones, P. J. F. Snijders, and G. M. Clifford, “Human papillomavirus type distribution in 30,848 invasive cervical cancers worldwide: variation by geographical region, histological type and year of publication,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 927–935, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schiffman and P. E. Castle, “Human papillomavirus: epidemiology and public health,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 930–934, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Peralta-Rodríguez, P. Romero-Morelos, V. Villegas-Ruiz et al., “Prevalence of human papillomavirus in the cervical epithelium of Mexican women: meta-analysis,” Infectious Agents and Cancer, vol. 7, article 34, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bruni, M. Diaz, X. Castellsagué, E. Ferrer, F. X. Bosch, and S. de Sanjosé, “Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: Meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 202, no. 12, pp. 1789–1799, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. de Sanjose, W. G. Quint, L. Alemany et al., “Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1048–1056, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Secretaria de Salud, México. Perfil epidemiológico de los tumores malignos en México, http://www.dgepi.salud.gob.mx.
O. P. Günther, G. Ogilvie, M. Naus et al., “Protecting the next generation: what is the role of the duration of human papillomavirus vaccine-related immunity?” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 197, no. 12, pp. 1653–1661, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. P. Durham, E. M. Poolman, Y. Ibuka, J. P. Townsend, and A. P. Galvani, “Reevaluation of epidemiological data demonstrates that it is consistent with cross-immunity among human papillomavirus types,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 206, no. 1291, 1298 pages, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Martcheva, B. M. Bolker, and R. D. Holt, “Vaccine-induced pathogen strain replacement: what are the mechanisms?” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 3–13, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lipsitch, “Bacterial vaccines and serotype replacement: lessons from Haemophilus influenzae and prospects for Streptococcus pneumoniae,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 336–345, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
E. L. Franco, S. de Sanjosé, T. R. Broker et al., “Human papillomavirus and cancer prevention: gaps in knowledge and prospects for research, policy, and advocacy,” Vaccine, vol. 30, supplement 5, pp. F175–F182, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
C. N. Podder and A. B. Gumel, “Transmission dynamics of a two-sex model for Herpes Simplex Virus type 2,” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 17, pp. 339–386, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Malik, J. Reimer, A. Gumel, E. H. Elbasha, and S. Mahmud, “The impact of an imperfect vaccine and pap cytology screening on the transmission of human papillomavirus and occurrence of associated cervical dysplasia and cancer,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1173–1205, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
H. R. Thieme and C. Castillo-Chavez, “How may infection-age-dependent infectivity affect the dynamics of HIV/AIDS?” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1447–1479, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
E. H. Elbasha, E. J. Dasbach, and R. P. Insinga, “Model for assessing human papillomavirus vaccination strategies,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 28–41, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
N. de Carvalho, J. Teixeira, C. M. Roteli-Martins et al., “Sustained efficacy and immunogenicity of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine up to 7.3 years in young adult women,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 38, pp. 6247–6255, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Elbasha, “Global stability of equilibria in a two-sex HPV vaccination model,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 894–909, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Elbasha, E. J. Dasbach, R. P. Insinga, R. M. Haupt, and E. Barr, “Age-based programs for vaccination against HPV,” Value in Health, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 697–707, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. X. Bosch, T. R. Broker, D. Forman et al., “Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases,” Vaccine, vol. 31, supplement 7, pp. H1–H31, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Lía Murall, K. S. McCann, and C. T. Bauch, “Revising ecological assumptions about Human papillomavirus interactions and type replacement,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. van der Ark, D. F. Hozbor, C. J. Boog, B. Metz, G. P. van den Dobbelsteen, and C. A. van Els, “Resurgence of pertussis calls for re-evaluation of pertussis animal models,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 11, pp. 1121–1137, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. De Vincenzo, C. Ricci, C. Conte, and G. Scambia, “HPV vaccine cross-protection: Highlights on additional clinical benefit,” Gynecologic Oncolog, vol. 130, pp. 642–651, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Kahn, D. R. Brown, L. Ding et al., “Vaccine-type human papillomavirus and evidence of herd protection after vaccine introduction,” Pediatrics, vol. 130, pp. 249–256, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
T. D. Querec, B. M. Gurbaxani, and E. R. Unger, “Randomization modelling to ascertain clustering patterns of human papillomavirus types detected in cervicovaginal samples in the United States,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e82761, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Luna, M. Plata, M. Gonzalez et al., “Long-term follow-up observation of the safety, inmunogenicity, and effectiveness of gardasil in adult women,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e83431, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Tota, A. V. Ramanakumar, M. Jiang et al., “Epidemiologic approaches to evaluating the potential for human papillomavirus type replacement postvaccination,” The American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 625–634, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Raúl Peralta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2302

Downloads

1841

Citations