Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2015, Article ID 454638, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/454638
Research Article

Identifying Odd/Even-Order Binary Kernel Slices for a Nonlinear System Using Inverse Repeat m-Sequences

School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China

Received 27 June 2014; Revised 9 September 2014; Accepted 1 October 2014

Academic Editor: Shengyong Chen

Copyright © 2015 Jin-yan Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Z, Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems, Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004.
  2. R. B. Pinter and B. Nabet, Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Function, and Networks, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1992.
  3. B. A. Lavoie, R. Mehta, and A. R. D. Thornton, “Linear and nonlinear changes in the auditory brainstem response of aging humans,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 772–785, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. C.-K. Wu, S. V. David, and J. L. Gallant, “Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 29, pp. 477–505, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. O. Franz and B. Schölkopf, “A unifying view of Wiener and Volterra theory and polynomial kernel regression,” Neural Computation, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 3097–3118, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. J. J. Eggermont, “Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system,” Hearing Research, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 177–201, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. W. Lee and M. Schetzen, “Measurement of the Wiener kernels of a non-linear system by cross-correlation,” International Journal of Control, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 237–254, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Orcioni, M. Pirani, and C. Turchetti, “Advances in Lee-Schetzen method for Volterra filter identification,” Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 265–284, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. V. Z. Marmarelis and T. W. Berger, “General methodology for nonlinear modeling of neural systems with Poisson point-process inputs,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. N. Kolokotronis, G. Gatt, and N. Kalouptsidis, “On the generation of sequences simulating higher order white noise for system identification,” Signal Processing, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 833–852, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. R. F. Burkard, M. Don, and J. J. Eggermont, Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2007.
  12. M. Baldwin and P. Watkin, “Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 361–369, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. E. Sutter, “A practical nonstochastic approach to nonlinear time-domain analysis,” in Advanced Methods of Physiological Systems Modeling, V. Z. Marmarelis, Ed., pp. 303–315, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Lineton, O. Kuponiyi, and A. R. D. Thornton, “The effect of stimulus rate and time-separation on Volterra slices of otoacoustic emissions,” Hearing Research, vol. 239, no. 1-2, pp. 34–53, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. E. Sutter, “Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique,” Vision Research, vol. 41, no. 10-11, pp. 1241–1255, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Shi and K. E. Hecox, “Nonlinear system identification by m-pulse sequences: application to brainstem auditory evoked responses,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 834–845, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. A. Benardete and J. D. Victor, “An extension of the m-sequence technique for the analysis of multi-input nonlinear systems,” in Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling, Z. Vasilis and Z. Marmarelis, Eds., pp. 87–110, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  18. H.-W. Chen, C. J. Aine, E. Best et al., “Nonlinear analysis of biological systems using short M-sequences and sparse-stimulation techniques,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 513–536, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. H. Tan and K. R. Godfrey, “The generation of binary and near-binary pseudorandom signals: an overview,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 583–588, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Mitra, “On the construction of M-sequences via primitive polynomials with a fast identification method,” International Journal of Computer Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 158–163, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Schetzen, “Nonlinear system modeling based on the Wiener theory,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 1557–1573, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Srinivasan and R. Rengaswamy, “Use of inverse repeat sequence (IRS) for identification in chemical process systems,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 3420–3429, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G.-B. Stan, J. J. Embrechts, and D. Archambeau, “Comparison of different impulse response measurement techniques,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 249–262, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Giri and E. W. Bai, Block-Oriented Nonlinear System Identification, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. Z. Yen-Jone, “Inverse-repeat m sequence and system identification,” Automatica Sinica, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 107–115, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  26. N. Ream, “Nonlinear identification using inverse-repeat m sequences,” Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 213–218, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus