Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 585409, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/585409
Research Article

Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Muscle Activation Dynamics

1Institut für Mathematik, Universität Koblenz, 56070 Koblenz, Germany
2Institut für Sport- und Bewegungswissenschaft, Universität Stuttgart, Allmandring 28, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
3Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Lehrstuhl für Bewegungswissenschaft, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Seidelstraße 20, 07749 Jena, Germany
4Stuttgart Research Centre for Simulation Technology, Pfaffenwaldring 7a, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Received 15 December 2014; Accepted 5 February 2015

Academic Editor: Eduardo Soudah

Copyright © 2015 Robert Rockenfeller et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Y. Scovil and J. L. Ronsky, “Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2055–2063, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. L. Lehman and L. W. Stark, “Three algorithms for interpreting models consisting of ordinary differential equations: sensitivity coefficients, sensitivity functions, global optimization,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107–122, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Chan, A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola, “Sensitivity analysis of model output: variance-based methods make the difference,” in Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Winter Simulation (WSC '97), S. Andradóttir, K. Healy, D. Withers, and B. Nelson, Eds., pp. 261–268, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  4. A. Saltelli and K. S. E. Chan, Sensitivity Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 2000.
  5. F. E. Zajac, “Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 359–411, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Hatze, “A myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 103–119, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. A. Kistemaker, A. J. van Soest, and M. F. Bobbert, “Length-dependent [Ca2+] sensitivity adds stiffness to muscle,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1816–1821, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. van Soest, Jumping from structure to control: a simulation study of explosive movements [Ph.D. thesis], Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992.
  9. A. J. van Soest and M. F. Bobbert, “The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 195–204, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Cole, A. van den Bogert, A. W. Herzog, and K. Gerritsen, “Modelling of force production in skeletal muscle undergoing stretch,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 29, pp. 1091–1104, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Günther, S. Schmitt, and V. Wank, “High-frequency oscillations as a consequence of neglected serial damping in Hill-type muscle models,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. F. B. Haeufle, M. Günther, A. Bayer, and S. Schmitt, “Hill-type muscle model with serial damping and eccentric force-velocity relation,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1531–1536, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Hatze, Myocybernetic Control Models of Skeletal Muscle, University of South Africa, 1981.
  14. D. A. Kistemaker, A. J. van Soest, and M. F. Bobbert, “Is equilibrium point control feasible for fast goal-directed single-joint movements?” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 2898–2912, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. A. Kistemaker, A. J. van Soest, and M. F. Bobbert, “A model of open-loop control of equilibrium position and stiffness of the human elbow joint,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 341–350, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. T. M. Vukobratovic, General Sensitivity Theory, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1962.
  17. R. P. Dickinson and R. J. Gelinas, “Sensitivity analysis of ordinary differential equation systems—a direct method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 123–143, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. H. ZivariPiran, Efficient simulation, accurate sensitivity analysis and reliable parameter estimation for delay differential equations [Ph.D. thesis], University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2009.
  19. B. W. Bader and T. G. Kolda, “Algorithm 862: matlab tensor classes for fast algorithm prototyping,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 635–653, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. O. Scherzer, Mathematische Modellierung—Vorlesungsskript, Universität Wien, 2009.
  21. A. Saltelli and P. Annoni, “How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1508–1517, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. C. Frey, A. Mokhtari, and T. Danish, “Evaluation of selected sensitivity analysis methods based upon application to two food safety process risk models,” Tech. Rep., Computational Laboratory for Energy, North Carolina State University, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  23. H. Benker, Differentialgleichungen mit MATHCAD und MATLAB, vol. 1, Springer, Berlin , Germany, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. H. Hatze, “A general mycocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 143–157, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Mörl, T. Siebert, S. Schmitt, R. Blickhan, and M. Günther, “Electro-mechanical delay in hill-type muscle models,” Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 12, no. 5, Article ID 1250085, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Siebert, O. Till, and R. Blickhan, “Work partitioning of transversally loaded muscle: experimentation and simulation,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 217–229, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. Roszek, G. C. Baan, and P. A. Huijing, “Decreasing stimulation frequency-dependent length-force characteristics of rat muscle,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 2115–2124, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. H. Langland, M. A. Shapiro, and R. Gelaro, “Initial condition sensitivity and error growth in forecasts of the 25 January 2000 east coast snowstorm,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 957–974, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Sunar and A. D. Belegundu, “Trust region methods for structural optimization using exact second order sensitivity,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 275–293, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus