Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2015, Article ID 638568, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/638568
Research Article

Adaptively Tuned Iterative Low Dose CT Image Denoising

1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G9
2Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2
3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3

Received 23 January 2015; Revised 2 May 2015; Accepted 3 May 2015

Academic Editor: Hugo Palmans

Copyright © 2015 SayedMasoud Hashemi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. J. Brenner and E. J. Hall, “Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 22, pp. 2277–2284, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Yu, X. Liu, S. Leng et al., “Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective,” Imaging in Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–84, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Hsieh, Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, vol. PM188, SPIE Press Book, Bellingham, Wash, USA, 2nd edition, 2009.
  4. Z. Liao, S. Hu, M. Li, and W. Chen, “Noise estimation for single-slice sinogram of low-dose X-ray computed tomography using homogenous patch,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 696212, 16 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Hu, Z. Liao, and W. Chen, “Sinogram restoration for low-dosed X-ray computed tomography using fractional-order Perona-Malik diffusion,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 391050, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. T. Li, X. Li, J. Wang et al., “Nonlinear sinogram smoothing for low-dose X-ray CT,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 2505–2513, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Lee, L. Xing, R. Davidi, R. Li, J. Qian, and R. Lee, “Improved compressed sensing-based cone-beam CT reconstruction using adaptive prior image constraints,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2287–2307, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Tang, B. E. Nett, and G.-H. Chen, “Performance comparison between total variation (TV)-based compressed sensing and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 54, no. 19, pp. 5781–5804, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Li, J. Tang, and G.-H. Chen, “Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance,” Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 4, Article ID 041906, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. M. Mendrik, E.-J. Vonken, A. Rutten, M. A. Viergever, and B. Van Ginneken, “Noise reduction in computed tomography scans using 3-D anisotropic hybrid diffusion with continuous switch,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1585–1594, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Rabbani, R. Nezafat, and S. Gazor, “Wavelet-domain medical image denoising using bivariate laplacian mixture model,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2826–2837, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Borsdorf, R. Raupach, T. Flohr, and J. Hornegger, “Wavelet based noise reduction in CT-images using correlation analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1685–1703, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Scharf and C. Demeure, Statistical Signal Processing: Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1991.
  14. F. Zhu, T. Carpenter, D. R. Gonzalez, M. Atkinson, and J. Wardlaw, “Computed tomography perfusion imaging denoising using Gaussian process regression,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. N183–N198, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Hyder Ali and R. Sukanesh, “An efficient algorithm for denoising MR and CT images using digital curvelet transform,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 696, pp. 471–480, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Sivakumar, “Denoising of computer tomography images using curvelet transform,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 21–26, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Rabbani, “Image denoising in steerable pyramid domain based on a local Laplace prior,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2181–2193, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  18. E. Y. Sidky, Y. Duchin, X. Pan, and C. Ullberg, “A constrained, total-variation minimization algorithm for low-intensity x-ray CT,” Medical Physics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. S117–S125, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. R. Al-Hinnawi, M. Daear, and S. Huwaijah, “Assessment of bilateral filter on 1/2-dose chest-pelvis CT views,” Radiological Physics and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 385–398, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Wang and H. Zhou, “Total variation wavelet-based medical image denoising,” International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, vol. 2006, Article ID 89095, 6 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Hämäläinen, L. Harhanen, A. Hauptmann, A. Kallonen, E. Niemi, and S. Siltanen, “Total variation regularization for large-scale X-ray tomography,” International Journal of Tomography & Simulation, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Z. Zhu, K. Wahid, P. Babyn, D. Cooper, I. Pratt, and Y. Carter, “Improved compressed sensing-based algorithm for sparse-view CT image reconstruction,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 185750, 15 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. S. Hashemi, S. Beheshti, P. R. Gill, N. S. Paul, and R. S. C. Cobbold, “Fast fan/parallel beam CS-based low-dose CT reconstruction,” in Proceedings of the 38th IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '13), pp. 1099–1103, IEEE, May 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Chen, E. Loli Piccolomini, and F. Zama, “An automatic regularization parameter selection algorithm in the total variation model for image deblurring,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 73–92, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. S. Osher, A. Sole, and L. Vese, “Image decomposition and restoration using total variation minimization and the H1,” Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 349–370, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  26. H. Liao, F. Li, and M. K. Ng, “Selection of regularization parameter in total variation image restoration,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2311–2320, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. D. L. Donoho, “De-noising by soft-thresholding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 613–627, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. G. M. Vainikko, “The discrepancy principle for a class of regularization methods,” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  29. P. C. Hansen, “Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the l-curve,” SIAM Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 561–580, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. S. Akkoul, R. Harba, and R. Lédée, “An image dependent stopping method for iterative denoising procedures,” Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 611–620, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Hashemi, S. Beheshti, R. S. Cobbold, and N. S. Paul, “Non-local total variation based low-dose Computed Tomography denoising,” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '14), pp. 1083–1086, Chicago, Ill, USA, August 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, “Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2080–2095, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. Z. Li, L. Yu, J. D. Trzasko et al., “Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising,” Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 1, Article ID 011908, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Lu, N. He, and L. Li, “Nonlocal means-based denoising for medical images,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 438617, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Buades, B. Coll, and J. M. Morel, “A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one,” SIAM Journal on Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 490–530, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. D. Kang, P. Slomka, R. Nakazato et al., “Image denoising of low-radiation dose coronary CT angiography by an adaptive block-matching 3D algorithm,” in Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, vol. 8669 of Proceedings of SPIE, February 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. Abhari, M. Marsousi, J. Alirezaie, and P. Babyn, “Computed Tomography image denoising utilizing an efficient sparse coding algorithm,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA '12), pp. 259–263, July 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. Bartuschat, A. Borsdorf, H. Kostler, R. Rubinstein, and M. Sturmer, A Parallel K-SVD Implementation for CT Image Denoising, Fridrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany, 2009.
  39. D. H. Trinh, M. Luong, J. M. Rocchisani, C. D. Pham, H. D. Pham, and F. Dibos, “An optimal weight method for CT image denoising,” Journal of Electronic Scince and Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 124–129, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  40. P. Chatterjee and P. Milanfar, “Patch-based near-optimal image denoising,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1635–1649, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. J. Dutta, R. M. Leahy, and Q. Li, “Non-local means denoising of dynamic PET images,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e81390, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. F. Yu, Y. Chen, and L. Luo, “CT image denoising based on sparse representation using global dictionary,” in Proceedings of the 7th ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (CME '13), pp. 408–411, May 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. X. Shu, J. Yang, and N. Ahuja, “Non-local compressive sampling recovery,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP '14), pp. 1–8, IEEE, Santa Clara, Calif, USA, May 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. C. Won Kim and J. H. Kim, “Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images,” Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 1, Article ID 011901, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. R. Whiting, P. Massoumzadeh, O. A. Earl, J. A. O'Sullivan, D. L. Snyder, and J. F. Williamson, “Properties of preprocessed sinogram data in x-ray computed tomography,” Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 3290–3303, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Hsieh, “Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise,” Medical Physics, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2139–2147, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Beheshti, M. Hashemi, X.-P. Zhang, and N. Nikvand, “Noise invalidation denoising,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 6007–6016, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  48. J. M. Bioucas-Dias and M. A. Figueiredo, “A new TwIST: two-step iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithms for image restoration,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2992–3004, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. O. Axelsson, Iterative Solution Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  50. M. Lebrun, “An analysis and implementation of the BM3D image denoising method,” Image Processing On Line, vol. 2, pp. 175–213, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. S. G. Chang, B. Yu, and M. Vetterli, “Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1532–1546, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  52. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. T. Yamashiro, T. Miyara, O. Honda et al., “Adaptive iterative dose reduction using three dimensional processing (AIDR3D) improves chest CT image quality and reduces radiation exposure,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 8, Article ID e105735, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar