Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2016, Article ID 9567294, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9567294
Research Article

Endoleak Assessment Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Image Processing Methods in Stented Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Models

1Department of Radiology, Taipei City Hospital, Zhongxing Branch, Taipei 103, Taiwan
2National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
3Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan

Received 1 April 2016; Revised 2 July 2016; Accepted 9 August 2016

Academic Editor: Xiaopeng Zhao

Copyright © 2016 Yueh-Hsun Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z.-Y. Li, U. Sadat, J. U-King-Im et al., “Association between aneurysm shoulder stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 18, pp. 1815–1822, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. B. Newman, A. M. Arnold, G. L. Burke, D. H. O'Leary, and T. A. Manolio, “Cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults with small abdominal aortic aneurysms detected by ultrasonography: the cardiovascular health study,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 182–190, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. W. W. Reed, J. W. Hallett Jr., M. A. Damiano, and D. J. Ballard, “Learning from the last ultrasound—a population-based study of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 157, no. 18, pp. 2064–2068, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. V. Sterpetti, R. D. Schultz, R. J. Feldhaus, S. E. Cheng, and D. J. Peetz Jr., “Factors influencing enlargement rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 211–219, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. López-Candales, D. R. Holmes, S. Liao, M. J. Scott, S. A. Wickline, and R. W. Thompson, “Decreased vascular smooth muscle cell density in medial degeneration of human abdominal aortic aneurysms,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 993–1007, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Ailawadi, J. L. Eliason, and G. R. Upchurch Jr., “Current concepts in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 584–588, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. N. Watton, N. B. Raberger, G. A. Holzapfel, and Y. Ventikos, “Coupling the hemodynamic environment to the evolution of cerebral aneurysms: computational framework and numerical examples,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 131, no. 10, Article ID 101003, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C.-Y. Chen, R. Anton, M.-Y. Hung et al., “Effect of intraluminal thrombus on patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm hemodynamics via stereoscopic PIV and CFD modeling,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 136, no. 3, Article ID 031001, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Anton, C. Y. Chen, M. Y. Hung, E. A. Finol, and K. Pekkan, “Experimental and computational investigation of the patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm pressure field,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 981–992, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. M. Greenhalgh, L. C. Brown, G. P. Kwong et al., “Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled tria,” The Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9437, pp. 843–848, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla, “Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair,” Radiology, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 641–655, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Li and C. Kleinstreuer, “Analysis of biomechanical factors affecting stent-graft migration in an abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2264–2273, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Charonko, S. Karri, J. Schmieg, S. Prabhu, and P. Vlachos, “In vitro, time-resolved PIV comparison of the effect of stent design on wall shear stress,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1310–1321, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Desai, J. Eaton-Evans, C. Hillery et al., “AAA stent-grafts: past problems and future prospects,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1259–1275, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. A. Heikkinen, F. R. Arko, and C. K. Zarins, “What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension,” Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1337–1352, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. M. M. D. Lawrence-Brown, Z. Sun, J. B. Semmens, K. Liffman, I. D. Sutalo, and D. B. Hartley, “Type II endoleaks: when is intervention indicated and what is the index of suspicion for types I or III?” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 16, supplement 1, pp. I106–I118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Rozenblit, M. Patlas, A. T. Rosenbaum et al., “Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions,” Radiology, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 426–433, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. A. Weerakkody, S. R. Walsh, C. Cousins, K. E. Goldstone, T. Y. Tang, and M. E. Gaunt, “Radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 699–702, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Papaharilaou, J. A. Ekaterinaris, E. Manousaki, and A. N. Katsamouris, “A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 367–377, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Li and C. Kleinstreuer, “Effects of major endoleaks on a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y.-H. Lu, C.-Y. Chen, P. G. Menon, K.-T. Liu, and H.-H. Lin, “Hemodynamic effects of endoleak formation in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients with stent-graft implants,” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 554–558, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. S. Di Martino, G. Guadagni, A. Fumero et al., “Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 647–655, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. M. Scotti, A. D. Shkolnik, S. C. Muluk, and E. A. Finol, “Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness,” BioMedical Engineering Online, vol. 4, article 64, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. M. Scotti, J. Jimenez, S. C. Muluk, and E. A. Finol, “Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 301–322, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. H. Fraser, M.-X. Li, W. T. Lee, W. J. Easson, and P. R. Hoskins, “Fluid-structure interaction in axially symmetric models of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 195–209, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. M. Scotti and E. A. Finol, “Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Study,” Computers and Structures, vol. 85, no. 11–14, pp. 1097–1113, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Biasetti, T. C. Gasser, M. Auer, U. Hedin, and F. Labruto, “Hemodynamics of the normal aorta compared to fusiform and saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms with emphasis on a potential thrombus formation mechanism,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 380–390, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Lara, C.-Y. Chen, P. Mannor et al., “Hemodynamics of the hepatic venous three-vessel confluences using particle image velocimetry,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2398–2416, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. H. Leung, A. R. Wright, N. Cheshire et al., “Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurisms: a comparison with solid stress models,” BioMedical Engineering Online, vol. 5, article 33, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K.-J. Bathe, H. Zhang, and S. H. Ji, “Finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions,” Computers and Structures, vol. 72, no. 1–3, pp. 1–16, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. Chen, R. Antón, M. Hung, P. Menon, E. A. Finol, and K. Pekkan, “Effects of intraluminal thrombus on patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm hemodynamics via stereoscopic particle image velocity and computational fluid dynamics modeling,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 136, no. 3, Article ID 031001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. P. G. Menon, N. Teslovich, C.-Y. Chen, A. Undar, and K. Pekkan, “Characterization of neonatal aortic cannula jet flow regimes for improved cardiopulmonary bypass,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 362–372, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Z. Li and C. Kleinstreuer, “Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 369–382, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. M. Sampaio, J. M. Panneton, G. I. Mozes et al., “Proximal type I endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: predictive factors,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 621–628, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. P. Armon, S. W. Yusuf, S. C. Whitaker, R. H. S. Gregson, P. W. Wenham, and B. R. Hopkinson, “Thrombus distribution and changes in aneurysm size following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 472–476, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus