Research Article
Weighted Polynomial Approximation for Automated Detection of Inspiratory Flow Limitation
Table 4
Performance results of the test set (
). Accuracy, sensitivity = true positive rate (TP), and specificity = true negative rate (TN) are considered.
| Methods | Measure | NIFL | IFL Level 1 | IFL Level 2 | Total |
| FI | % correct | 96.70% | 50.41% | 65.59% | 78.68% | Correct # | 616 | 183 | 61 | 860 | TP/TN | 0.77/0.93 | 0.75/0.79 | 0.97/0.97 | — |
| 1st-order | % correct | 98.90% | 29.75% | 43.01% | 71.18% | Correct # | 630 | 108 | 40 | 778 | TP/TN | 0.70/0.97 | 0.68/0.73 | 0.93/0.95 | — |
| 2nd-order | % correct | 88.85% | 27.82% | 69.89% | 66.97% | Correct # | 566 | 101 | 65 | 732 | TP/TN | 0.70/0.75 | 0.69/0.72 | 0.73/0.97 | — |
| 3rd-order | % correct | 91.52% | 85.40% | 93.55% | 89.66% | Correct # | 583 | 310 | 87 | 980 | TP/TN | 0.98/0.89 | 0.84/0.93 | 0.66/0.99 | — |
| w.3rd-order | % correct | 93.56% | 93.56% | 96.77% | 94.14% | Correct # | 596 | 343 | 90 | 1029 | TP/TN | 0.98/0.91 | 0.89/0.97 | 0.94/0.99 | — |
|
|