Research Article

Predictive Behavior of a Computational Foot/Ankle Model through Artificial Neural Networks

Table 3

Percent differences, ANN-predictions versus target stiffness.

LigamentTarget stiffness (N/mm)Percent difference
FFNRBFN

Tibiocalcaneal75.00.89%6.22%
Tibionavicular5.0−5.79%19.44%
Tibiospring 17.6−5.79%19.44%
Tibiospring 225.0−5.79%19.44%
Anterior tibiotalar90.02.98%2.00%
Posterior tibiotalar117.02.98%2.00%
Talocalcaneal interosseous33.86.32%6.58%
Plantar fascia 130.06.14%3.61%
Plantar fascia 245.06.14%3.61%
Plantar fascia 337.56.14%3.61%
Plantar fascia 415.06.14%3.61%
Plantar fascia 5150.06.10%2.72%
Spring 116.93.22%8.73%
Spring 22.33.39%29.90%

Ligament stiffness values for the patient-specific foot/ankle model alongside percent differences between target values and the ANN-predicted stiffness. (Negative percentages indicate a decrease relative to the target stiffness value.) Within the foot/ankle model, multiple linear elements comprise a single ligament; therefore, the components listed in the table represent each uniquely assigned stiffness value.