Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6810626, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6810626
Research Article

Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with 82Rb PET

1Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2National Cardiac PET Centre, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
4Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Adrian F. Ocneanu

Received 11 September 2016; Accepted 24 November 2016; Published 13 February 2017

Academic Editor: Thomas Desaive

Copyright © 2017 Adrian F. Ocneanu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. N. Wernick and J. N. Aarsvold, Emission Tomography: The Fundamentals of PET and SPECT, Academic Press, 2004.
  2. H. Watabe, Y. Ikoma, Y. Kimura, M. Naganawa, and M. Shidahara, “PET kinetic analysis—compartmental model,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 583–588, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Nesterov, R. Sciagra, A. Alessio et al., “RUBY-10: a cross-comparison study of 10 software tools for quantification of Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 54, supplement 2, p. 1693, 2013, Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts. View at Google Scholar
  4. T. H. Schindler, X.-L. Zhang, J. O. Prior et al., “Assessment of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of rest and cold pressor test-stimulated myocardial blood flow with 13N-ammonia and PET,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1178–1188, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Efseaff, R. Klein, M. C. Ziadi, R. S. Beanlands, and R. A. Dekemp, “Short-term repeatability of resting myocardial blood flow measurements using rubidium-82 PET imaging,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 997–1006, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Klein, A. Ocneanu, J. M. Renaud, M. C. Ziadi, R. S. B. Beanlands, and R. A. deKemp, “Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. R. A. DeKemp, J. Declerck, R. Klein et al., “Multisoftware reproducibility study of stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 3D dynamic PET/CT and a 1-tissue-compartment model of 82Rb kinetics,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 571–577, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. E. Bravo, D. Chien, M. Javadi, J. Merrill, and F. M. Bengel, “Reference ranges for LVEF and LV volumes from electrocardiographically gated 82Rb cardiac PET/CT using commercially available software,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 898–905, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. B. Moody, V. L. Murthy, B. C. Lee, J. R. Corbett, and E. P. Ficaro, “Variance estimation for myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2343–2353, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Dorbala, M. F. Di Carli, D. Delbeke et al., “SNMMI/ASNC/SCCT guideline for cardiac SPECT/CT and PET/CT 1.0,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1485–1507, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Klein, J. M. Renaud, M. C. Ziadi et al., “Intra-and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 600–616, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Klein, A. Adler, R. S. Beanlands, and R. A. deKemp, “Precision-controlled elution of a 82Sr/82Rb generator for cardiac perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 659–673, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. A. DeKemp and C. Nahmias, “Attenuation correction in PET using single photon transmission measurement,” Medical Physics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 771–778, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. D. Hutchins, J. M. Caraher, and R. R. Raylman, “A region of interest strategy for minimizing resolution distortions in quantitative myocardial PET studies,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1243–1250, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Lortie, R. S. B. Beanlands, K. Yoshinaga, R. Klein, J. N. DaSilva, and R. A. DeKemp, “Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1765–1774, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Katoh, K. Yoshinaga, R. Klein et al., “Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow estimation with three-dimensional dynamic rubidium-82 PET and modified spillover correction model,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 763–774, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. M. Mateos-Pérez, M. Desco, M. W. Dae, C. García-Villalba, L. Cussó, and J. J. Vaquero, “Automatic TAC extraction from dynamic cardiac PET imaging using iterative correlation from a population template,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 308–314, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. So, J. Hsieh, Y. Imai et al., “Prospectively ECG-triggered rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT for quantitative imaging of myocardial perfusion,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 829–836, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. D. Cerqueira, N. J. Weissman, V. Dilsizian et al., “Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging committee of the council on clinical cardiology of the american heart association,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 539–542, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. T. Madsen, “A simplified formulation of the gamma variate function,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1597–1600, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Peck, C. Olsen, and J. Devore, Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis, Nelson Education, 2011.
  22. S. L. R. Ellison, V. J. Barwick, and T. J. D. Farrant, Practical Statistics for the Analytical Scientist, RSC Publishing, 2009, http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/eBook/978-0-85404-131-2#!divbookcontent.
  23. M. Levene, An Introduction to Search Engines and Web Navigation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Klein, R. S. Beanlands, R. W. Wassenaar et al., “Kinetic model-based factor analysis of dynamic sequences for 82-rubidium cardiac positron emission tomography,” Medical Physics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 3995–4010, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. F. Vasquez, N. P. Johnson, and K. L. Gould, “Variation in quantitative myocardial perfusion due to arterial input selection,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 559–568, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Yoshida, N. Mullani, and K. L. Gould, “Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13-ammonia,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1701–1712, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. Wei, A. R. Jayaweera, S. Firoozan, A. Linka, D. M. Skyba, and S. Kaul, “Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion?” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 252–260, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus