Research Article
EEG-Based Automatic Sleep Staging Using Ontology and Weighting Feature Analysis
Table 14
Performance comparison of various state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy (%).
| Researchers | Five-state (%) | Four-state (%) | Three-state (%) | Two-state (%) |
| Sharma et al. [6] | 91.70 | 92.10 | 93.90 | 98.30 | Liang et al. [9] | 83.60 | — | — | — | Sharma et al. [10] | 91.13 | 92.29 | 94.66 | 98.02 | Zhu et al. [13] | 88.90 | 89.30 | 92.60 | 97.90 | Hsu et al. [17] | 87.20 | — | — | — | Berthomier et al. [23] | 71.20 | 74.50 | 88.30 | 95.40 | Our proposed method | 90.57 | 92.41 | 94.85 | 97.21 |
|
|
Boldface indicates that the highest classification accuracy values. “—” indicates the missing cases.
|