Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left"> </td><td class="align_center">Elements</td><td class="align_center">Nodes</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Flat-type model</td><td class="align_center">29,989</td><td class="align_center">54,547</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Dome-type model</td><td class="align_center">30,429</td><td class="align_center">55,211</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Cushion-type model</td><td class="align_center">50,487</td><td class="align_center">90,314</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Total number of elements and nodes.</div>

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible 