Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible

<table class="table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Loading condition</td><td class="align_center">Flat-type model</td><td class="align_center">Dome-type model</td><td class="align_center">Cushion-type model</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">VI</td><td class="align_center">7.0701</td><td class="align_center">6.8054</td><td class="align_center">6.6113</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">VC</td><td class="align_center">10.538</td><td class="align_center">10.507</td><td class="align_center">9.6443</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">VM</td><td class="align_center">3.644</td><td class="align_center">3.618</td><td class="align_center">3.688</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">OM</td><td class="align_center">7.202</td><td class="align_center">7.127</td><td class="align_center">6.7322</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Maximum equivalent stress in the peri-implant bone (MPa).</div>

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible 