Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible

<table class="table-group" id="tab6"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Loading condition</td><td class="align_center">Flat-type model</td><td class="align_center">Dome-type model</td><td class="align_center">Cushion-type model</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">VI</td><td class="align_center">5.72</td><td class="align_center">5.55</td><td class="align_center">5.62</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">VC</td><td class="align_center">6.66</td><td class="align_center">6.49</td><td class="align_center">6.58</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">VM</td><td class="align_center">4.40</td><td class="align_center">4.16</td><td class="align_center">4.16</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">OM</td><td class="align_center">18.05</td><td class="align_center">17.83</td><td class="align_center">16.59</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>The maximum deformation of the mucosa (10<sup>−3 </sup><i>μ</i>m/<i>μ</i>m).</div>

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

tab6

Table 6

Table 6: Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible 