Research Article

The Effect of CT Scan Parameters on the Measurement of CT Radiomic Features: A Lung Nodule Phantom Study

Table 5

Effect of scan parameters on computer features in −630 HU phantom nodules.

Image featuresSlice thicknessmAsReconstruction algorithm
5.00 vs 1.255.00 vs 2.502.50 vs 1.2530 vs 120Lung vs standard
EffectdEffectdEffectdEffectdEffectd

HistogramMean<2.85<2.71<0.2800.07>1.11
Stddev<0.7100.25<0.50>0.72>1.65
Variance<0.7400.35<0.55>0.68>1.20
Skewness<1.15<1.2500.19<0.61<1.04
Kurtosis>0.40>0.63<0.16>0.58>2.77
Energy00.10<0.29>0.31<0.89<2.46
Entropy<0.5200.07<0.38>0.85>2.56

GLCMContrast<1.32<0.97<0.65>0.58>1.27
Dissimilarity<1.21<0.74<0.56>0.65>1.67
Homogeneity>0.69>0.16>0.40<0.79<2.81
ASM>0.4800.03>0.42<0.87<1.53
Energy>0.5500.08>0.41<0.87<1.80
Probability max>0.3400.0600.26<0.76<1.21
Entropy<0.6300.20<0.41>0.75>1.72
Correlation>1.20>0.80>0.65<0.58<1.21

GLRLMLRE>0.4000.08>0.34<0.79<2.12
GLN00.13<0.23>0.31<0.91<2.23
RLN<0.4600.02<0.34>0.83>2.27
LGRE>0.98>1.4900.3500.2100.13
HGRE<2.89<2.64<0.44>0.20>1.09

and A is statistically smaller than B (A vs B); and A is statistically larger than B (A vs B); 0 indicates A and B are not statistically significant (A vs B). Cohen’s d: small ≥ 0.20; medium ≥ 0.50; large ≥ 0.80.