Research Article
Minimalistic Approach to Coreference Resolution in Lithuanian Medical Records
Table 1
Comparison of coreference resolution approaches.
| Method | Foundation | Precision | Recall | F1 |
| Hobbs [32] | Syntactic tree with labeled nodes, syntactic rules, selection constraint rules | 0.81–0.91 | na | na | BFP [33] | Centering theory | 0.49–0.90 | na | na | Left-right centering [34] | Modified centering theory | 0.72–0.81 | na | na | Mitkov [35] | POS tagger, antecedent indicators | 0.897 | na | na | RAP [36] | Salience factors | 0.85–0.89 | na | na | Xrenner [37] | Syntactic and semantic rules | 0.51–0.55 | 0.49–0.57 | 0.49–0.56 | Probabilistic [38] | Bayesian rule | 0.82–0.84 | na | na | MARS [39] | Genetic algorithms | 0.53–0.84 | na | na | Soon et al. [40] | Machine learning (decision tree C5) | 0.65–0.69 | 0.53–0.56 | 0.62 | ILP [41] | Machine learning (logistic classifier) | 0.78–0.89 | 0.47–0.58 | 0.61–0.68 | Wiseman et al. [42] | Deep learning | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.73 | Lee et al. [43] | Deep learning | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.77 | Žitnik et al. [44] | Conditional random fields | 0.68–0.94 | 0.30–0.87 | 0.41–0.87 |
|
|