Research Article
Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Baseline information of included literature.
| Author | Year | Type of study | Intervention (treatment vs. control) | Patients (treatment/control) | Female (treatment/control) | Efficacy (yes/no) treatment vs. control |
| Nguyen et al. | 2016 | RCT, DB | Adalimumab vs. placebo | 115/111 | 66/72 | 70/45 vs. 50/61 | Jaffe et al. | 2016 | RCT, DB | Adalimumab vs. placebo | — | — | — | Ramanan et al. | 2017 | RCT, DB | Adalimumab vs. placebo | 60/30 | 47/23 | 44/16 vs. 12/18 | Quartier et al. | 2017 | RCT, DB | Adalimumab vs. placebo | 16/15 | 15/13 | 9/7 vs. 3/12 | Cecchin et al. | 2018 | Prospective study | Adalimumab vs. infliximab | 95/59 | 16/15 | 57/38 vs. 12/47 | Heissigerová et al. | 2018 | RCT, DB | Sarilumab vs. placebo | 38/20 | 23/13 | 29/9 vs. 15/5 | Rathinam et al. | 2019 | RCT, SB | Methotrexate vs. mycophenolate mofetil | 107/109 | 75/60 | 64/43 vs. 56/53 |
|
|
RCT: randomized controlled trial; DB: double-blind; SB: single-blind; DMARDs: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.
|