Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Machine Learning and Network Methods for Biology and Medicine 2021

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5533483 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5533483

Zhiqiang Wang, Zhongjun Ding, Yan Guan, Chunhui Liu, Linjun Wang, Wensheng Shan, Jie Yang, "Altered Gene Expression in the Testis of Infertile Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia", Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2021, Article ID 5533483, 9 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5533483

Altered Gene Expression in the Testis of Infertile Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia

Academic Editor: Tao Huang
Received21 Feb 2021
Revised14 May 2021
Accepted28 May 2021
Published10 Jun 2021

Abstract

Background. The molecular mechanism of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify gene expression changes in NOA patients and to explore potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Methods. The gene expression profiles of GSE45885 and GSE145467 were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and the differences between NOA and normal spermatogenesis were analyzed. Enrichment analysis was performed to explore biological functions for common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in GSE45885 and GSE145467. Coexpression analysis of DEGs in GSE45885 was performed, and two modules with the highest correlation with NOA were screened. Key genes were then screened from the intersection genes of the two modules and common DEGs and PPI network. The expression of key genes was validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) experiments. Finally, through miRTarBase, miRDB, and RAID, the miRNAs were predicted to regulate key genes, respectively. Results. A total of 345 common DEGs were identified and they were mainly related to spermatogenesis, insulin signaling pathway. Coexpression analysis of DEGs in GSE45885 yielded eight modules; MEblack and MEturquoise had the highest correlation with NOA. Six genes in MEturquoise and RNF141 in MEblack were identified as key genes. qRT-PCR experiments validated the differential expression of key genes between NOA and control. Furthermore, RNF141 was regulated by the largest number of miRNAs. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the significant change expression of key genes may be potential markers and therapeutic targets of NOA and may have some impact on the development of NOA.

1. Introduction

Infertility refers to the inability to carry out a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of unprotected sexual intercourse. According to worldwide statistics, infertility affects 10-15% of couples, and almost half of cases are caused by men [1]. Azoospermia is the most serious type of male infertility, which is mainly divided into obstructive azoospermia (OA) and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) [2]. Among them, nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) accounts for 20% of infertility [3]. NOA is usually caused by the failure of spermatogenesis of unknown etiology and is a difficult problem in the field of male infertility [4]. The pathogenesis of NOA is unclear. Therefore, it is necessary to study the molecular mechanism of NOA and seek more potential therapeutic methods.

Despite systematic treatment options, the chances of successful clinical or surgical treatment for nonobstructive azoospermia are small [5]. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is an effective method to treat severe male infertility as an assisted reproductive technology, but the success rate of NOA patients after ICSI treatment is about 36% [6]. Studies have found that spermatogenesis defects are significantly associated with decreased androgen levels [7]. Known causes of NOA include endocrine and chronic diseases (such as hypogonadism or diabetes) affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis [8]. However, in patients with NOA, obvious genetic abnormalities are one of the causes of spermatogenic failure [9].

Spermatogenesis is an extremely complex process of cell differentiation involving 2,300 genes that regulate germ cell development and maturation [10]. The success of spermatogenesis and mature sperm release is related to the expression of large numbers of genes in spermatogenic cells [11]. The testis is an important organ determining human fertility and its endocrine status [12]. Many differences in testicular gene expression can be used to evaluate the underlying mechanism of spermatogenesis failure in NOA patients [13]. In addition, the evaluation of these gene transcripts can reflect the status of spermatogenesis in the corresponding testis and may be a potential therapeutic target.

In addition, microRNAs (miRNAs) posttranscriptionally regulated gene expression. Studies have shown that miRNAs play a crucial role in spermatogenesis [14]. It is suggested that miRNAs may mediate the development of spermatogenic cells by targeting the expression of mRNAs and participate in spermatogenesis and male infertility [15].

Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) is a widely used method to build coexpression pairwise correlation matrices [16]. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network has also been frequently used to identify candidate genes for diseases [17]. There have been studies utilizing WGCNA and PPI networks together to screen potential target signals [18]. In this study, the transcriptome data of NOA patients in public databases were used to explore the molecular dysregulation mechanism and potential target genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

The gene expression profiles of NOA and normal controls were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database [19]. GSE45885 included gene expression array data of testicular biopsy samples from 27 human testicular biopsies in men with various nonobstructive azoospermias and 4 with normal spermatogenesis based on GPL6244. GSE145467 included gene expression array data of 20 testis samples (10 showing obstructive azoospermia and 10 samples showing nonobstructive azoospermia) based on GPL4133. Raw data were normalized with robust multiarray average (RMA) method [20].

2.2. Difference Analysis

Differential expression analysis was performed using the limma R package [21, 22] to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between NOA and normal spermatogenesis. Genes with and value < 0.05 in GSE45885 and and value < 0.05 in GSE145467 were assigned as significantly different.

2.3. Biological Function

The Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment [23] was analyzed by using clusterProfiler R package [2426] for DEGs. Screening threshold value < 0.05 was considered significantly enriched.

2.4. Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA)

The gene coexpression networks based on topological overlap were identified by WGCNA analytical method. The coexpression modules for DEGs of GSE45885 were constructed through WGCNA R package [16]. Eigengene expression patterns within each module are condensed into a “Module eigengene (ME).” The correlation between modules and clinical traits was calculated using Pearson correlation based on clinical information.

2.5. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network Analysis

The selected genes were performed through PPI network using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database. The combined was considered significant. The PPI network was visualized by Gephi software. The key genes were chosen based on their degree of connectivity with other genes. Visualization of the network of key genes is through Cytoscape software [27, 28].

2.6. Sample Collection

Peripheral blood samples from 5 NOA patients and 5 normal controls were collected from our hospital. All subjects read and signed the informed consent form. The study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital.

2.7. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

The total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen, California, USA) from blood samples. Reverse transcription expression was performed using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The qRT-PCR was carried out using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Invitrogen, California, USA) according to the manufacturer. The primer sequences of genes are shown in Table 1. Relative expression of genes was calculated using the method [29]. Genes were normalized to GAPDH [30].


GenesPrimers

GAPDHF: 5-CATGTTCGTCATGGGTGTGAA-3
R: 5-GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG-3
RNF141F: 5-CCCATCCTCGGTCACATCTT-3
R: 5-CCCCCTTCTCCTCTACGACAAC-3
AKAP3F: 5-CAGGACTGGAAAATGGACACCT-3
R: 5-TTTGTGTGGGTCTCCTGAGTTG-3
AKAP4F: 5-TGATACTACAATGATGTCTGATGAT-3
R: 5-GGAACTAGCAGCATCCTTGTAATCTTTATC-3
TNP1F: 5-GCTGGATGCCAATCGC-3
R: 5-GTCCCTTCTGTTCGGTTG-3
TNP2F: 5-GTCCCTTCTTTCGGGTTG-3
R: 5-TCAGTTGTACTCCGTCGTCGGGGAG-3
ODF1F: 5-CCGCACTGAGTTGTCTTTTGG-3
R: 5-GGGTGCATGTATAAGTCACACA-3
PRM2F: 5-ATGGTTCGCTACCGAATGAGG-3
R: 5-CTCCGCCTTCTGCATGACC-3

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis used SPSS 20.0 software. Data were presented as the (SD) [31, 32]. Student’s -test was used to compare the differences between two groups. value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The test level is (two-sided).

3. Results

3.1. Abnormal Gene Expression in NOA Patients

To identify gene expression changes in NOA patients, we performed differential analysis of gene expression between NOA patients and normal spermatogenesis. A total of 951 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found in GSE45885 (Figure 1(a), Table S1). Then, 1753 significantly differentially expressed genes were found in GSE145467 (Figure 1(b), Table S2). Of these, we found 345 common DEGs (Figure 1(c)). These genes may be significantly associated with NOA.

3.2. Biological Functions of NOA-Related Genes

Through enrichment analysis of common DEGs, we found a lot of important terms in GO results. Biological processes (BP) mainly involved spermatogenesis, spermatid development, and sperm motility (Figure 2(a)). Cell composition (CC) mainly included acrosomal vesicle, sperm fibrous sheath, and sperm principal piece (Figure 2(b)). Molecular function (MF) mainly included microtubule motor activity, ATPase activity, and lysozyme activity (Figure 2(c)). In addition, we obtained 9 significantly enriched KEGG signaling pathways (Figure 2(d)), including the “insulin signaling pathway,” “metabolic pathways,” and “Hedgehog signaling pathway”.

3.3. Network Analysis of NOA-Related Genes

We performed WGCNA network analysis on DEGs of GSE45885. These genes were formed into eight coexpression modules by removing the grey module which without coexpression behavior (Figure 3(a)). Correlation analysis between module and trait showed that MEblack had the highest positive correlation with NOA and MEturquoise had the highest negative correlation with NOA (Figure 3(b)). To identify key genes that had important effects on NOA, we performed an intersection analysis between MEblack, MEturquoise, and common DEGs (Figure 3(c)). RNF141 was found in MEblack, and 323 intersecting genes were found in MEturquoise. Further, we constructed a PPI network for 323 genes (Figure 3(d)). The top six genes with the greatest connectivity were identified as key genes (AKAP3, AKAP4, TNP1, TNP2, ODF1, and PRM2) (Figure 3(e)), as well as RNF141. In GSE45885, RNF141 was highly expressed in NOA, while AKAP3, AKAP4, TNP1, TNP2, ODF1, and PRM2 were low expressed (Figure 3(f)).

3.4. miRNA Regulatory Network for Key Genes

Through qRT-PCR experiments, we verified the differential expression of key genes between NOA patients and normal controls (Figure 4(a)). miRTarBase, miRDB, and RAID were used to predict the miRNA regulators of key genes, respectively. We obtained seven common miRNAs (hsa-miR-32-5p, hsa-miR-590-3p, hsa-miR-203a-3p, hsa-miR-4775, hsa-miR-4735-5p, hsa-miR-33a-3p, and hsa-miR-5688) (Figure 4(b)). Interestingly, these miRNAs all target RNF141 (Figure 4(c)).

4. Discussion

Thousands of genes have been involved in the establishment of male fertility potential, and many others have not yet been revealed [33]. Abnormal gene expression is important for understanding the etiology of male infertility. In this study, we identified gene expression changes in NOA patients and screened potential markers and molecular targets of NOA based on NOA-related gene expression profiles in the GEO database. To our knowledge, this is the first time that WGCNA and PPI network were together used to jointly screen the potential genes of NOA, and then, miRNA regulations for the key genes were further screened. Compared with other articles using these data [34, 35], we used multiple means of bioinformatics analysis to obtain more accurate potential target genes of NOA.

Severe impairment or absence of spermatogenesis is a characteristic of NOA in the biological functions involved by NOA-related DEGs [36]. Spermatogenesis is a complex process involving many transcription factors specific to cell type [37]. Normal spermatogenesis is dependent on Sertoli cells [38]. Genes related to the differentiation function of Sertoli cells are involved in glucose metabolism and insulin signaling [39]. One potential way to improve spermatogenesis is to optimize intratesticular testosterone (ITT) levels, and insulin-like factor 3 is a serum marker that may predict ITT [40]. Seminal plasma is a noncellular liquid component of semen, including substances related to metabolism [41]. Proteomic changes in seminal plasma of asthenozoospermia patients are mainly related to metabolism and energy production [42]. Arachidonic acid metabolism and inhibition of phospholipase may be associated with premature acrosome reaction [43]. The Hedgehog signaling pathway influences cell development, tissue homeostasis, cell proliferation and differentiation, and cell fate [44]. An increasing number of studies have shown that the Hedgehog signaling pathway in Sertoli cells is associated with spermatogenesis [45].

The positive correlation between MEblack and NOA was the highest, and the key gene RNF141 was expressed higher in NOA patients than in controls. Studies have shown that RNF141 is restrictively expressed in the testicular tissue of fertile men and involved in maintaining normal male fertility [46]. RNF141 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is recruited during oocyte maturation [47]. RNF141 is reported to be specifically present in acrosome and tail of mouse sperm acrosome [48]. In addition, RNF141 is regulated by multiple miRNAs and may play an important role in network regulation in NOA. miRNAs participate in the regulation of NOA through spermatogenesis and cell cycle [49]. Tyrosine phosphorylation of A-kinase-associated protein 3 (AKAP3) increases sperm binding to the zona pellucida [50]. AKAP3 and AKAP4 are the main components of fibrous sheath (FS) in the sperm tail [51, 52]. AKAP3 and AKAP4 play important benefit roles in sperm function, including regulation of sperm motility, sperm capacitation, and acrosome response [53]. AKAP4 is an ERK 1/2 substrate and a regulator of human sperm cAMP/PKA and PKC/ERK 1/2 pathways, which are associated with capacitation and acrosome reaction [54]. Transition proteins (TNP) are small proteins, the levels of TNP1 and TNP2 were significantly decreased in the testis and epididymis, and mild germ cell apoptosis was happened in both the testes and epididymis [55]. The reproductive potential of the TNP1- and TNP2-null mutant sperm in mice was reduced. [56]. Abnormal expression of TNP and PRM genes will lead to abnormal nuclear condensation, leading to male sterility [57]. Lack of protamine-2 (PRM2) can lead to severe membrane defects in spermatozoa, resulting in loss of motility and abnormal sperm head morphology and infertility [58]. PRM2 deficiency can trigger oxidative stress, leading to DNA damage, which leads to infertility [59]. It has been confirmed that the lack of outer dense fiber protein 1 (ODF1) is a marker and potential driver of idiopathic male infertility [60, 61]. Western blot showed that the expression level of ODF 1 in asthenozoospermia was indeed downregulated [62].

This study also has some limitations. First, our analytical data were derived from the GEO database, which lacked knowledge of the clinical data of the samples. Second, although we have validated key genes in clinical samples, more experimental data and clinical validation are needed for these genes to be applied. Another issue to consider is that spermatogenesis is a dynamic process, and this analysis provides information on gene expression and spermatogenesis status only at one point in time.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, our preliminary findings suggested that RNF141, AKAP3, AKAP4, TNP1, TNP2, ODF1, and PRM2 were potential markers and therapeutic targets for NOA. They were associated with spermatogenesis and metabolic reactions. Given the potential impact of key genes on NOA, our findings suggest that further studies are necessary to confirm their role in NOA.

Data Availability

The corresponding data can be found in GSE45885 and GSE145467.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Zhiqiang Wang and Zhongjun Ding are contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Natural Fund of Gansu Science and Technology Department (17JR5RA027).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: the differentially expressed genes between NOA and normal spermatogenesis in GSE45885. Table S2: the differentially expressed genes between NOA and normal spermatogenesis in GSE145467. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. A. Massart, W. Lissens, H. Tournaye, and K. Stouffs, “Genetic causes of spermatogenic failure,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Tournaye, C. Krausz, and R. D. Oates, “Concepts in diagnosis and therapy for male reproductive impairment,” The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 554–564, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. A. Kosar, N. Ozcelik, and A. Kosar, “Cytogenetic abnormalities detected in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Liu et al., “Serum metabolomic profiling identifies characterization of non-obstructive azoospermic men,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 238, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Glina and M. Vieira, “Prognostic factors for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia,” Clinics, vol. 68, pp. 121–124, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Sabetian and M. S. Shamsir, “Systematic analysis of protein interaction network associated with azoospermia,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 11, article 1857, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Mengual, J. Oriola, C. Ascaso, J. L. Ballesca, and R. Oliva, “An increased CAG repeat length in the androgen receptor gene in azoospermic ICSI candidates,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 279–284, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Cerván-Martín, J. A. Castilla, R. J. Palomino-Morales, and F. D. Carmona, “Genetic landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia and new perspectives for the clinic,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 300, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. Tuttelmann, F. Werny, T. G. Cooper, S. Kliesch, M. Simoni, and E. Nieschlag, “Clinical experience with azoospermia: aetiology and chances for spermatozoa detection upon biopsy,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 34, pp. 291–298, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Xie, X. Chen, Y. Liu, Z. Wu, and P. Ping, “Multicenter study of genetic abnormalities associated with severe oligospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia,” The Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Eghbali, M. R. Sadeghi, N. Lakpour et al., “Molecular analysis of testis biopsy and semen pellet as complementary methods with histopathological analysis of testis in non-obstructive azoospermia,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 707–715, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Kordic, D. Tomic, D. Soldo, D. Hauptman, and D. Jezek, “Reinke’s crystals in perivascular and peritubular Leydig cells of men with non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia: a retrospective case control study,” Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 158–165, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. Babakhanzadeh, A. Khodadadian, S. Rostami et al., “Testicular expression of TDRD1, TDRD5, TDRD9 and TDRD12 in azoospermia,” BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 33, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Tang, Z. Huang, X. He et al., “Altered miRNA profile in testis of post-cryptorchidopexy patients with non-obstructive azoospermia,” Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 78, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Y. Song, H. Meng, X. G. Wang et al., “Reduced microRNA-188-3p expression contributes to apoptosis of spermatogenic cells in patients with azoospermia,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 50, no. 1, article e12297, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Langfelder and S. Horvath, “WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 559, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Ratnakumar, N. Weinhold, J. C. Mar, and N. Riaz, “Protein-protein interactions uncover candidate ‘core genes’ within omnigenic disease networks,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 16, no. 7, article e1008903, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. S. Nangraj, G. Selvaraj, S. Kaliamurthi, A. C. Kaushik, W. C. Cho, and D. Q. Wei, “Integrated PPI- and WGCNA-retrieval of hub gene signatures shared between Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, p. 881, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Barrett, S. E. Wilhite, P. Ledoux et al., “NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--update,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, pp. D991–D995, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. A. Irizarry, B. Hobbs, F. Collin et al., “Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data,” Biostatistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249–264, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. E. Ritchie, B. Phipson, D. Wu et al., “limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 7, article e47, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Gu, J. Chen, X. Dang et al., “Hippo pathway core genes based prognostic signature and immune infiltration patterns in lung squamous cell carcinoma,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 11, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Gu, X. Shi, X. Dang et al., “Identification of common genes and pathways in eight fibrosis diseases,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 11, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. Yu, L. G. Wang, Y. Han, and Q. Y. He, “clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters,” OMICS, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 284–287, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Gu, X. Shi, W. Qiu et al., “Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic role and mutational characteristics of m6A-related genes in lung squamous cell carcinoma,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 9, article 661792, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Gu, X. Shi, Z. Huang et al., “A comprehensive study of construction and analysis of competitive endogenous RNA networks in lung adenocarcinoma,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics, vol. 2020, no. 8, article 140444, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Zhang, X. Shi, C. Gu et al., “Identification of cell-to-cell interactions by ligand-receptor pairs in human fetal heart,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1866, no. 12, article 165917, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Liang, X. Shi, C. Yu et al., “Identification of novel candidate genes in heterotaxy syndrome patients with congenital heart diseases by whole exome sequencing,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1866, no. 12, article 165906, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. X. Rao, X. Huang, Z. Zhou, and X. Lin, “An improvement of the 2^(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis,” Biostat Bioinforma Biomath, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 71–85, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  30. C. Gu, Z. Huang, X. Chen et al., “TEAD4 promotes tumor development in patients with lung adenocarcinoma via ERK signaling pathway,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1866, no. 12, article 165921, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Sun, C. Gu, J. Shi et al., “Reconstruction of mediastinal vessels for invasive thymoma: a retrospective analysis of 25 cases,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 725–733, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Chen, C. Gu, X. Chen et al., “Clinicopathological and prognostic analyses of 86 resected pulmonary lymphoepithelioma‐like carcinomas,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 544–552, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. J. Hamada, S. C. Esteves, and A. Agarwal, “A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia,” Clinics, vol. 68, pp. 39–60, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. Hu, S. Luo, Y. Xi et al., “Integrative bioinformatics approaches for identifying potential biomarkers and pathways involved in non-obstructive azoospermia,” Translational Andrology and Urology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 243–257, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. W. Zheng, Z. Zou, S. Lin et al., “Identification and functional analysis of spermatogenesis-associated gene modules in azoospermia by weighted gene coexpression network analysis,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 3934–3944, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. D. Palermo, Q. V. Neri, P. N. Schlegel, and Z. Rosenwaks, “Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in extreme cases of male infertility,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 12, article e113671, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Yuan, H. M. Swiggin, H. Zheng, and W. Yan, “A testis-specific gene, Ubqlnl, is dispensable for mouse embryonic development and spermatogenesis,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 408-409, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. D. Ni, S. L. Hao, and W. X. Yang, “Multiple signaling pathways in Sertoli cells: recent findings in spermatogenesis,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 541, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. Santi, P. Crepieux, E. Reiter et al., “Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) action on spermatogenesis: a focus on physiological and therapeutic roles,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, article 1014, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Shiraishi, “Hormonal therapy for non-obstructive azoospermia: basic and clinical perspectives,” Reproductive Medicine and Biology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 65–72, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Candenas and R. Chianese, “Exosome composition and seminal plasma proteome: a promising source of biomarkers of male infertility,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 19, article 7022, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Jodar, A. Soler-Ventura, and R. Oliva, “Semen proteomics and male infertility,” Journal of Proteomics, vol. 162, pp. 125–134, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. Intasqui, M. Camargo, M. P. Antoniassi et al., “Association between the seminal plasma proteome and sperm functional traits,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 617–628, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. V. Tran, S. A. Lachke, and R. W. Stottmann, “Toward a systems-level understanding of the Hedgehog signaling pathway: defining the complex, robust, and fragile,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Systems Biology and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 83–100, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. La Sala, D. Marazziti, C. Di Pietro, E. Golini, R. Matteoni, and G. P. Tocchini-Valentini, “Modulation of Dhh signaling and altered Sertoli cell function in mice lacking the GPR37-prosaposin receptor,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2059–2069, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Zhang, W. Qiu, H. Wu et al., “The shorter zinc finger protein ZNF230 gene message is transcribed in fertile male testes and may be related to human spermatogenesis,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 359, no. 3, pp. 721–727, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. R. M. Schultz, P. Stein, and P. Svoboda, “The oocyte-to-embryo transition in mouse: past, present, and future,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 160–174, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. H. Song, D. Su, P. Lu et al., “Expression and localization of the spermatogenesis-related gene, Znf230, in mouse testis and spermatozoa during postnatal development,” BMB Reports, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 664–669, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. H. T. Zhang, Z. Zhang, K. Hong et al., “Altered microRNA profiles of testicular biopsies from patients with nonobstructive azoospermia,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 100–105, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Zhao and F. W. K. Kan, “Human OVGP1 enhances tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins in the fibrous sheath involving AKAP3 and increases sperm-zona binding,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1363–1377, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. Carrera, G. L. Gerton, and S. B. Moss, “The major fibrous sheath polypeptide of mouse sperm: structural and functional similarities to the A-kinase anchoring proteins,” Developmental Biology, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 272–284, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. Vijayaraghavan, G. A. Liberty, J. Mohan, V. P. Winfrey, G. E. Olson, and D. W. Carr, “Isolation and molecular characterization of AKAP110, a novel, sperm-specific protein kinase A-anchoring protein,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 705–717, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. Hillman, D. Ickowicz, R. Vizel, and H. Breitbart, “Dissociation between AKAP3 and PKARII promotes AKAP3 degradation in sperm capacitation,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, article e68873, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. L. Rahamim Ben-Navi, T. Almog, Z. Yao, R. Seger, and Z. Naor, “A-kinase anchoring protein 4 (AKAP4) is an ERK1/2 substrate and a switch molecule between cAMP/PKA and PKC/ERK1/2 in human spermatozoa,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 37922, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. Champroux, J. Torres-Carreira, P. Gharagozloo, J. R. Drevet, and A. Kocer, “Mammalian sperm nuclear organization: resiliencies and vulnerabilities,” Basic and Clinical Andrology, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 17, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. R. Shirley, S. Hayashi, S. Mounsey, R. Yanagimachi, and M. L. Meistrich, “Abnormalities and reduced reproductive potential of sperm from Tnp1- and Tnp2-null double mutant mice,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1220–1229, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. T. Chioccarelli, R. Pierantoni, F. Manfrevola et al., “Histone post-translational modifications and circRNAs in mouse and human spermatozoa: potential epigenetic marks to assess human sperm quality,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Schneider, M. Balbach, J. F. Jikeli et al., “Re-visiting the protamine-2 locus: deletion, but not haploinsufficiency, renders male mice infertile,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 36764, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. Schneider, F. Shakeri, C. Trötschel et al., “Protamine-2 deficiency initiates a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated destruction cascade during epididymal sperm maturation in mice,” Cells, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 1789, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. Hetherington, E. K. Schneider, C. Scott et al., “Deficiency in outer dense fiber 1 is a marker and potential driver of idiopathic male infertility,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3685–3693, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. C. Tapia Contreras and S. Hoyer-Fender, “CCDC42 localizes to manchette, HTCA and tail and interacts with ODF1 and ODF2 in the formation of the male germ cell cytoskeleton,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 7, p. 151, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. W. Zhao, Z. Li, P. Ping, G. Wang, X. Yuan, and F. Sun, “Outer dense fibers stabilize the axoneme to maintain sperm motility,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1755–1768, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Zhiqiang Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views372
Downloads641
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.