Review Article

Deep Learning in Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Prediction: A Minireview on Challenges, Recent Trends, and Future Directions

Table 4

Summary of the studies for the classification of breast cancer.

PublicationType of dataMethodsPerformance

[92]Custom dataset of ultrasound imagesPretrained CNNsAUC of 0.90 (nonmalignant vs. malignant), AUC of 0.88 (benign vs. malignant)
[93]1 custom+2 publically available datasetsDL-based approach using a matching layer (custom dataset), AUCs around 0.89 (publically available datasets)
[94]Custom dataset of ultrasound imagesInception v3, VGG19Robust and efficient classification performances
[95]Custom dataset of ultrasound imagesTraining from scratch, pretrained VGG16, fine-tuning approach0.97 accuracy, 0.98 AUC using fine-tuning approach
[96]Custom dataset of breast MRI imagesCross-modal transfer learning approachOverall accuracy of 0.93 using cross-modal approach
[97]Custom dataset of breast MRI imagesDL-based methodHigh sensitivity in the range of 93-100%
[98]Custom dataset of multiparametric MRI imagesPretrained CNN architectures
[99]BreakHis, Breast Cancer Classification Challenge 2015Inception recurrent residual CNN model100% for the binary and multiclass (Breast Cancer Classification Challenge 2015 dataset)
[100]BreakHisSingle-task CNN, multitask CNNPatient score of 83.72% for binary classification using single-task CNN
[101]2015 bioimaging breast histology classification challenge, BreakHis datasetProgressive DL-based modelsRecognition rate of 96.4% and 99.5% on multiclass and binary classification tasks on 2015 bioimaging breast histology classification challenge
[102]BreakHis dataset, PatchCamelyon dataset, 2015 Bioimaging challenge dataset, 2018 ICIAR datasetVGG19, MobileNet, DenseNetAccuracy of 98.13% on BreakHis dataset
[103]BreakHis datasetDL and hierarchical classification approachAccuracy of 95.48% on the multiclass classification task
[104]BreakHis datasetIntegrated DL model98.51% classification success on the multiclass classification task
[105]BreakHis datasetDenseNet and Xception architectures99% and 92% accuracy on binary and multiclass classification tasks
[106]BreakHis datasetDL-based modelMean recognition rate of for binary classification
[107]BreakHis datasetDL-based modelAccuracy of for multiclass classification
[108]BreakHis datasetBag of words, locality-constrained linear coding, CNNsFor CNN model accuracies between 96.15% and 98.33% for the binary classification and 83.31% and 88.23% for the multiclass classification
[109]BreakHis datasetCombination of 4 residual networksCorrect classification rate of 96.25% for 8-class categorization
[110]BreakHis datasetEnd-to-end model based on FCN and bidirectional LSTMAccuracy of on binary classification task
[111]BreakHis datasetResNet-18, ResNet-50, and AlexNetImage-level accuracy of 96.88% for binary classification
[112]BreakHis datasetWeakly supervised learning frameworkClassification rate of up to 92.1% for binary classification
[38]2015 Bioimaging challenge datasetCNN modelsAccuracies of 77.8% for four classes and 83.3% for carcinoma/noncarcinoma were achieved
[113]ICIAR 2018 Grand ChallengePretrained ResNet-50, Inception v3, and VGG16 architecturesAccuracies of 87.2% for multiclass, 93.8% for binary classification tasks
[114]2015 Bioimaging challenge databaseClustering algorithm and ResNet-50 architecture88.89% accuracy on the overall test set for multiclass classification
[115]BreakHis datasetVGG16, VGG19, and ResNet-50 architectures92.60% accuracy
[116]Custom datasetCNN, KNN, Inception v3, SVM, and ANN modelsAccuracy of 97% using ANN algorithm for binary classification
[117]Custom datasetCNN and ANN modelsAccuracy of for the binary classification task using a VGG model, accuracy of for the multiclass classification task
[118]BreakHis datasetVGG16, VGG19, ResNet-50 architecturesAccuracy of 93.25% for multiclass classification task
[119]BreakHis datasetDL-based model-score of 90.3
[120]BreakHis datasetDeep second-order pooling networkAccuracy of 97.92% for binary classification
[121]BreakHis+custom datasetsPretrained CNN architectures (GoogLeNet, VGGNet, and ResNet)Accuracy of 97.67% for binary classification
[122]Custom datasetTransformer modelsPrecision of 0.976 for relation recognition
[123]Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank, TCGA datasetDeep neural networkAUC on TCGA of 0.861, AUC on Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank was 0.905
[124]INbreast databaseDL models