Review Article
[Retracted] Energy Efficiency and Reliability Considerations in Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey
Table 4
Performance analysis of existing schemes.
| Schemes/solutions | Characteristics | No. of dead nodes | Packets sent to sink | Packet dropped ratio | Packet received at sink | Thermal aware approach | Network stability period | Delay |
| IM-SIMPLE [1] | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | No | Medium | Medium | DARE [14] | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | No | Medium | High | M-ATTEMPT [23] | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | Yes | Low | Medium | SIMPLE [28] | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | No | Medium | Medium | FEEL [29] | Medium | High | Low | High | No | High | Medium | TARA [56] | High | Low | High | Low | Yes | Low | High | LTR [57] | High | Low | High | Low | Yes | Low | High | ALTR [57] | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | Yes | Low | Medium | LTRT [58] | Medium | High | Low | High | Yes | Medium | Medium | RE-ATTEMPT [59] | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | No | Medium | Low | M2E2 [61] | Medium | High | High | Medium | Yes | Medium | Medium | CO-LAEEBA [79] | Low | High | Low | High | No | High | Low | WASP [85] | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | No | Low | Low | CICADA [86] | Medium | High | Low | High | No | Medium | Medium | ERRS | Medium | High | Low | High | No | High | Low |
|
|