Research Article
Predicting Breast Cancer Leveraging Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
Table 7
Comparison of machine learning algorithms on Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset.
| Author | Year | Dataset | Imbalance handling | Feature selection | Features | Classifier | Validation type | Accuracy achieved % |
| Wisconsin original breast cancer dataset (WOBC) [23] | Salama et al. [41] | 2012 | WOBC | — | Chi-square & PCA | 10 | J48 & MLP | 10-fold | 97.28% | Hamsagayathri & Sampath [42] | 2017 | WOBC | — | Feature ranking | — | Random Forest | 10-fold | 96.70% | Our approach | 2020 | WOBC | Normalization by standardization | Correlation based selection & RFE | 8 | MLP | 5-fold | 98.20% | Wisconsin Prognostic breast cancer data (WPBC) [24] | Tintu and Paulin [43] | 2013 | WPBC | Manual removal of instances | Feature ranking | — | Fuzzy -means clustering | 4-fold | 97.13% | Khan et al. [44] | 2013 | WPBC | — | YAGGA | 19 | Linear regression | 10-fold | 84.34% | Our approach | 2020 | WPBC | Normalization by standardization | Correlation-based selection and RFE | 16 | MLP | 5-fold | 98.33% |
|
|