Research Article
[Retracted] Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Prognosis of Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease: A Meta-analysis
Table 1
Basic characteristics of the included literature.
| Study | Year | Sample time | Cases treat/con | Age (years) | Sex ratio (M/FM) | Study design | Treatment time (months) | NOS | Outcome measures | Treat | Con | Treat | Con |
| Qiu jing | 2015 | 2011.01~2013.02 | 50/50 | | | 26/24 | 28/22 | RCT | 3 | 6 | ③④⑤⑥ | Qiu junfei | 2019 | 2015.03~2017.03 | 30/30 | | | 18/12 | 17/13 | RCT | 6 | 7 | ③⑥ | Cui dongfeng | 2016 | 2013~2014 | 40/40 | | | 23/17 | 22/18 | RCT | 6 | 6 | ①②③⑤ | Tian yuan | 2019 | 2017.01~2018.12 | 48/48 | | | 29/19 | 29/19 | RCT | 3 | 7 | ②③④ | Zhou pengyu | 2021 | 2018.01~2020.01 | 40/40 | | | 22/18 | 24/16 | RCT | 6 | 7 | ②③④⑤⑥ | Fu tianwen | 2019 | 2013.04~2018.04 | 34/34 | | | 17/17 | 18/16 | RCT | 6 | 7 | ③④ | Wang jie | 2015 | 2013.06~2014.08 | 30/30 | 42~69 | 42~69 | 18/12 | 18/12 | RCT | 3 | 6 | ③④⑤⑥ | Liu jia | 2019 | 2017.01~2017.12 | 25/25 | | | 13/12 | 15/10 | RCT | 6 | 7 | ②③④⑤⑥ | He laiming | 2020 | 2015.01~2018.12 | 30/30 | | | 17/13 | 16/14 | RCT | 6 | 7 | ②③④⑥ | Haijiao Jin | 2016 | 2013.01~2014.12 | 98/82 | | | 56/40 | 44/38 | RCT | 3 | 8 | ①②④⑤⑥ | Shen yan | 2016 | 2010.01~2013.01 | 46/48 | | | 29/17 | 31/17 | RCT | 6 | 8 | ①②③④⑤⑥ | Xing an | 2014 | 2012.02~2013.06 | 52/88 | | | 27/25 | 51/37 | RCT | 12 | 6 | ②③④⑤⑥ | Huang zanwei | 2012 | 2011.05~2012.05 | 40/40 | 36~73 | 37~75 | 22/18 | 24/16 | RCT | 6 | 6 | ①③④⑥ | Xiujuan Zang | 2020 | 2005.01~2015.12 | 309/233 | | | 179/130 | 123/110 | RCT | 12 | 8 | ①②⑥ |
|
|
Note: Treat: Treatment group; Con: control group; M: male; FM: female; RCT: randomized controlled trial; ①: 1-year survival rate; ②: adverse effects rate; ③: serum creatinine; ④: blood urea nitrogen; ⑤: hemoglobin; ⑥: albumin.
|