The Effect of Serum <i>β</i>-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Huang, Ju; Liu, Yuying; Yang, Hua; Xu, Yuanfang; Lv, Wei

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8315519

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Database-Based Deep Learning and Optimization Algorithms for Age-Related Diseases and Conditions

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8315519 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8315519

The Effect of Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ju Huang,¹Yuying Liu,²Hua Yang,³Yuanfang Xu,⁴and Wei Lv³

Academic Editor: Xi Lou

Received11 Jul 2022

Revised20 Aug 2022

Accepted26 Aug 2022

Published09 Sept 2022

Abstract

Background. The relationship among elevated serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), the incidence of pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been controversial. Differences in study design, subject bias due to demographic characteristics, and differences in local medical levels could contribute to inconsistent results. Methods. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and China Science Digital Library (CSDL) databases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) research subjects were singleton pregnant women; (2) the study is identified as cohort study; (3) the subjects were assigned to the high β-hCG group and control group according to whether the exposure factors increased β-hCG in the second trimester; (4) the observed outcomes include at least pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), diabetes (gestational diabetes mellitus, GMD), preterm delivery (PD), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR); and (5) the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of exposure factors are calculated based on literature dataset. To determine the risk bias of selected literatures, Newcastle-Ottawa scale was applied. The chi-square test was further used for heterogeneity analysis. If heterogeneity was identified, subgroup analyses were then performed for source investigation. Results. A total of 13 literatures were included and analyzed, including 67,355 pregnant women and 5980 pregnant women assigned to the high β-HCG group and 61,375 pregnant women to the control group. The incidence of PIH in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group (, 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], , ). There was no heterogeneity among literatures (, , ), and thus there is no identified publication bias (). The incidence of preterm birth in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group (, 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], , ). The analysis suggested no heterogeneity among included literatures (, , ) and no publication bias (). Higher incidence of abortion was observed in the high β-HCG group compared with the control group (, 95% CI [1.92, 4.09], , ). There was no heterogeneity among literatures (, , ) and no publication bias (). The incidence of gestational diabetes was higher in the high β-HCG group than in the control group (, 95% CI [1.05, 4.40], , ). Heterogeneity was identified among literatures (, , ). Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were not robust, and there was no publication bias (). Compared with control, the incidence of IGUR was higher in the high β-HCG group (, 95% CI [1.75, 4.19], , ) with no heterogeneity among literatures (, , ) and no publication bias (). Conclusion. High levels of β-hCG during pregnancy in singleton women are associated with a high incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pregnant women with high levels of β-hCG should be monitored more closely, followed up, and given timely medical interventions to reduce the incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes.

1. Introduction

Common pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), diabetes mellitus (GMD), preterm delivery (PD), intrauterine growth restriction Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and miscarriage, are important causes of increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [1–3]. In addition, pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes increase family burdens and consumption of social medical resources [4, 5]. Due to the variety in the level of medical technology, prevention of complications during pregnancy and safe delivery remains challenging especially in developing countries. Accurate prediction and comprehensive monitoring and follow-ups could contribute significantly in reducing pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes [5].

Previous studies identified serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) as a key parameter associated with the incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes [6–8]. Serum β-hCG is a glycoprotein secreted by placental trophoblast cells [7, 9, 10]. Embryo formation happens after fertilized egg moves into the uterine cavity and implants in matured woman. During the development of fetus, the placental syncytiotrophoblast produce a large amount of HCG which could be excreted into urine through maternal blood circulation. Serum and urine HCG levels rapidly increase from 1 to 2.5 weeks of gestation, peak at the 8th week of pregnancy, decrease to moderate levels by the 4th month of pregnancy, and remain at the end of pregnancy [11, 12]. Serum β-hCG levels can reflect the functional status of the placenta. When placental ischemia and hypoxia happen, the secretion of β-hCG by trophoblast cells increases [13–15]. Placental function is directly related to the occurrence of various diseases during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

However, the correlation of β-hCG and the incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes have been controversial. Some studies suggested that high levels of β-hCG have no significant correlation with the incidence of IUGR, PIH, PD, and GDM [16]. In contrary, other studies concluded that high levels of β-hCG in the second trimester predict a high incidence of complications during pregnancy and poor pregnancy outcomes [17, 18]. Through our meta-analysis, we discovered that the inconsistent results might be caused by different study design, subject bias due to inconsistent demographic characteristics, and difference in medical levels. This study is aimed at elucidating the correlation of high levels of β-hCG on pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes through a meta-analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Download

Literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and China Science Digital Library (CSDL) databases. Searching terminology were as follows: β-human chorionic gonadotropin or β-hCG or hCG or human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy and adverse outcomes or complications. The languages of the literature are English and Chinese. The retrieval date was July 1, 2022.

2.2. Literature Screening

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) research subjects were singleton pregnant women; (2) the study is identified as cohort study; (3) the subjects were assigned to the high β-hCG group and control group according to whether the exposure factors increased β-hCG in the second trimester; (4) the observed outcomes include at least pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), diabetes (gestational diabetes mellitus, GMD), preterm delivery (PD), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR); and (5) the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of exposure factors are calculated based on literature dataset.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) repeated reports, (2) animal experiments, (3) inconsistent study types, (4) no control group, (5) inconsistent outcome indicators, and (6) incomplete literature data with authors contacted but data not replenished.

2.3. Data Extraction and Literature Risk Bias Assessment

Literature screening was performed by two researchers jointly. Data including author, title, publication time, study type, study number, number of high β-hCG group, number of control group, number of PIH, number of diabetes mellitus, number of intrauterine development, the number of delays, the number of miscarriages, and the number of premature births were extracted from included literatures. Unavailable datasets were obtained by contacting the authors. Two researchers performed the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to assess the risk of bias in the included studies, including the selectivity, comparability, and exposure factors and outcomes of study methods. was classified as low risk of bias, otherwise, high risk of bias. During the process of data extraction and risk of literature bias assessment, if there was disagreement between the researchers, consensus was reached through discussion.

2.4. Statistical Methods

Cochrane software RevMan5.3 was used for statistical analysis in this study. The OR value was calculated by the number of cases and the number of cases in the group. Statistical descriptions of effect sizes were performed using OR values and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was determined using chi-square test. When the or , it was considered that there was heterogeneity among the published literatures. Subgroup analysis was used to explore the root cause of heterogeneity. When heterogeneity could not be eliminated, use a random effects model or review only. When the and , it was considered that there was no heterogeneity among the publications, and a fixed effect model was used. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Two-sided indicates statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Features of the Included Literature

In this study, a total of 1031 literatures were retrieved from the above databases, 1018 literatures were excluded, and 13 literatures were included for this study [16–28]. The literature screening flowchart was shown in Figure 1. The 13 articles included 67355 pregnant women, among which, 5980 pregnant women were in the high β-hCG group and 61375 pregnant women were in the control group. All included literature information is shown in Table 1. The risk of bias assessment in the literature was shown in Table 2.

3.2. High β-hCG and PIH

A total of 9 studies compared the incidence of PIH between high β-hCG and control groups. No heterogeneity among 9 studies were identified from heterogeneity test (, , ). Therefore, a fixed-effects model was used for pooling. As shown in Figure 2, the incidence of PIH was suggested to be significantly higher in the high β-hCG group than in the control group (, 95% CI [2.31, 3.66], , ). Egger’s test and funnel plot shown in Figure 3 showed that the scatter points were distributed within the confidence interval with a semisymmetrical shape, and no publication bias was found ().

3.3. High β-hCG and PD

A total of 8 studies compared the incidence of PD between high β-hCG and control groups. The heterogeneity test confirmed nonheterogeneity among these studies (, , ). Therefore, a fixed-effects model was used for pooling. Compared to the control group, the analyzed results showed higher incidence of PD in the high β-hCG group (, 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], , ), as shown in Figure 4. Semisymmetrical distribution of scatter points within the confidence interval was observed, as shown in Figure 5, using Egger’s test and funnel plot.

3.4. High β-hCG and Abortion

A total of 4 studies compared the incidence of miscarriage between high β-hCG and control groups. There was no heterogeneity among selected 4 studies basing on the heterogeneity test (, , ). Therefore, a fixed-effects model was used for pooling. The analysis results showed that the incidence of miscarriage in the high β-hCG group was higher than that in the control group (, 95% CI [1.92, 4.09], , ), as shown in Figure 6. The scatter points fell in range of the confidence interval using Egger’s test and funnel plot along with a semisymmetrical shape () as shown in Figure 7.

3.5. High β-hCG and GDM

A total of 7 studies compared the incidence of GDM between high β-hCG and control groups. A heterogeneity was identified among the 7 studies with heterogeneity test (, , ). Therefore, a random effects model was used for pooling. The analysis results showed that the incidence of GDM during pregnancy in the high β-hCG group was higher than that in the control group (, 95% CI [1.05, 4.40], , ), as shown in Figure 8. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were not robust, as shown in Table 3. Egger’s test and funnel plot showed that the scatter points were distributed within the confidence interval, roughly symmetrical, and there was no publication bias (), as shown in Figure 9.

3.6. High β-hCG and IUGR

A total of 3 studies compared the incidence of IUGR between high β-hCG and control groups. The included 3 studies did not exhibit heterogeneity (, , ). Therefore, a fixed-effects model was used for pooling. The analysis results showed that the incidence of IUGR in the high β-hCG group was higher than that in the control group (, 95% CI [1.75, 4.19], , ), as shown in Figure 10. Egger’s test and funnel plot showed that the scatter points were distributed semisymmetrically within the confidence interval, and there was no publication bias (), as shown in Figure 11.

4. Discussion

Through our comprehensive meta-analysis, we concluded that high levels of β-hCG are risk factors for IUGR, PIH, PD, and miscarriage in singleton pregnancy. In terms of GDM, sensitivity analysis showed that the results were not robust. The relationship between high levels of β-hCG and GDM still needs further research to confirm.

High levels of β-hCG in the second trimester predict a high incidence of complications during pregnancy and poor pregnancy outcomes [9]. The possible underlying mechanism is that β-hCG produced by placental trophoblasts can directly reflect placental function, and placental function is directly related to the occurrence of various diseases during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes [29]. At present, it is believed that GDM, PIH, IUGR, PD, miscarriage, fetal respiratory distress, and stillbirth are all caused by placental pathophysiological changes [29, 30]. Taken all together, the use of β-hCG to predict the occurrence of gestational hypertension has its pathophysiological basis.

Brajenović-Milić et al. [16] studied that elevated β-hCG levels could lead to an increased incidence of preeclampsia; however, elevated β-hCG levels were not identified as an independent risk factor for preeclampsia. There is no significant evidence which suggests that high levels of were associated with the incidence of IUGR, PIH, PD, and GDM. We analyzed that the study was biased in the selection of pregnant women. Pregnant women in the study and control groups were poorly balanced with respect to baseline data. Sirikunalai et al. [17] suggested that low or high β-hCG levels will increase the risk of complications and adverse outcomes for pregnant women. However, this conclusion only fitted in the second trimester. Lepage et al. [18] showed that in singleton pregnant women, high β-hCG levels were associated with a high incidence of pregnancy complications. In multiple pregnancies, the conclusion remains consistent. Sharony et al. [26] found a strong correlation between high levels of β-hCG and the incidence of IUGR and PD. However, the morbidities of several other complications, including preeclampsia, placental abruption, and prenatal death, were associated with extremely high levels of beta-hCG, suggesting that pregnant women with high levels of beta-hCG should be counseled and monitored in extreme case. Cai et al. [19] found that there was no significant difference in the incidence of gestational hypertension, fetal distress, and placental abruption between pregnant women aged ≥35 years and the elevated β-hCG group compared with the normal group. The increase of serum β-hCG level in the second trimester is closely related to the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and it has certain clinical significance in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in obstetrics in combination with maternal age. Ding et al. [20] found that the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, oligohydramnios, and neonatal asphyxia in pregnant women with high serum β-hCG levels was significantly higher than those in women with normal levels. In addition, the same trend was not observed in the low β-hCG group and the normal group.

With the comprehensive meta-analysis, this study does exhibit some limitations. First of all, all included studies have inconsistent criteria for the definition of high β-hCG, which may affect the robustness of the results. Second, there is heterogeneity among studies in the relationship between β-hCG and GDM incidence; however, the root cause of heterogeneity was not identified. Thirdly, we did not explore the effect of very high or low levels of β-hCG on the incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Ghasemi-Tehrani et al. [31] found that low levels of β-hCG has no significant effect on the incidence of complications including PD, PIH, miscarriage, and IUGR. Another study [32] pointed out that very high levels of β-hCG increase the risk of adverse outcomes in pregnant women, including stillbirth, small-for-gestational-age infants, and complete moles. Finally, we were not able to age-stratify pregnant women for more instructive results.

In conclusion, high levels of β-hCG during pregnancy in singleton women are associated with a high incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pregnant women with high levels of β-hCG should be monitored more closely, followed up, and given timely medical interventions to reduce the incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes.

Data Availability

The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

The authors Ju Huang and Yuying Liu contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the People’s Hospital of Wanning, Hainan.

References

S. Cao, F. Dong, C. C. Okekpe, I. Dombrovsky, G. J. Valenzuela, and K. Roloff, “Common combinations of pregestational diagnosis and pregnancy complications,” Cureus, vol. 13, no. 11, article e19239, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Newfield, “Third-trimester pregnancy complications,” Primary Care, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 95–113, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Stepan, M. Hund, and T. Andraczek, “Combining biomarkers to predict pregnancy complications and redefine preeclampsia,” Hypertension, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 918–926, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chu, W. L. Yuan, S. L. Loy et al., “Maternal height, gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy complications,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 178, article 108978, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sharabi-Nov, K. Kumar, V. Fabjan Vodušek et al., “Establishing a differential marker profile for pregnancy complications near delivery,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 471–484, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Puget, Y. Joueidi, E. Bauville et al., “Serial hCG and progesterone levels to predict early pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies of uncertain viability: a prospective study,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, vol. 220, pp. 100–105, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Szczerba, P. Białas, P. Pięta, and A. Jankowska, “hCG - related molecules and their measurement,” Ginekologia Polska, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ganapathy, R. F. Lamont, and P. Bassett, “Unexplained elevated maternal serum β-HCG concentration and adverse pregnancy outcome,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 995–999, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Nwabuobi, S. Arlier, F. Schatz, O. Guzeloglu-Kayisli, C. Lockwood, and U. Kayisli, “hCG: biological functions and clinical applications,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 10, p. 2037, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Seeber, “What serial hCG can tell you, and cannot tell you, about an early pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1074–1077, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Berger and C. Sturgeon, “Pregnancy testing with hCG – future prospects,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 637–648, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kishino, Y. Tanaka, K. Nakae, Y. Iwatani, and T. Kamisako, “Relationship between serum hCG and urinary hCG in cases of pregnancy, abortion, and hydatidiform mole,” Rinsho Byori, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
S. H. Kuo, Y. H. Yang, R. H. Wang, T. F. Chan, and F. H. Chou, “Relationships between leptin, HCG, cortisol, and psychosocial stress and nausea and vomiting throughout pregnancy,” Biological Research for Nursing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. M. Revankar and L. Narmada, “Assessment of serum β-hCG and lipid profile in early second trimester as predictors of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 331–334, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ticconi, A. Zicari, A. Belmonte, M. Realacci, Rao ChV, and E. Piccione, “Pregnancy-promoting actions of hcg in human myometrium and fetal membranes,” Placenta, vol. 28 Suppl A, pp. S137–S143, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Brajenović-Milić, D. Tišlarić, M. Žuvić-Butorac et al., “Elevated second-trimester free β-hCG as an isolated finding and pregnancy outcomes,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 483–487, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sirikunalai, C. Wanapirak, S. Sirichotiyakul et al., “Associations between maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 178–182, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Lepage, D. Chitayat, J. Kingdom, and T. Huang, “Association between second-trimester isolated high maternal serum maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels and obstetric complications in singleton and twin pregnancies,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 1354–1359, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Cai, J. Yi, and Z. Weng, “Adverse pregnancy outcome associated free alpha fetoprotein, free Β human chorionic gonadotropin of pregnant women in the second trimester and their age,” Medical Journal of Qilu, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 174–177, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Ding, Y. Zhao, P. Zhu et al., “Relationship between serum free β -HCG or AFP levels and obstetric complications in pregnant women,” China Medical Herald, vol. 13, no. 21, pp. 119–122, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Gonen, R. Perez, M. David, H. Dar, R. Merksamer, and M. Sharf, “The association between unexplained second-trimester maternal serum hCG elevation and pregnancy complications,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Han, L. Shao, L. Zhang, Y. Lu, and S. Ni, “Correlation of serum β -HCG, AFP and uE3 with hypertension and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy and effect on delivery outcome,” Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use, vol. 7, no. 31, pp. 112-113, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Han, L. Shao, L. Zhang, Y. Lu, and S. Ni, “Correlation analysis of serum β -HCG, AFP and uE3 with complications during pregnancy,” Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use, vol. 7, no. 28, pp. 119-120, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Li, X. Huang, and D. Liu, “Prediction of pregnancy induced hypertension by the study of abnormal maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin in second trimester,” Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics And Gynecology, vol. 1, pp. 28–30, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
L. S. Onderoglu and A. Kabukcu, “Elevated second trimester human chorionic gonadotropin level associated withadverse pregnancy outcome,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 245–249, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sharony, O. Zipper, K. Amichay et al., “The magnitude of elevated maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy complications,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 576–579, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yaron, M. Cherry, R. L. Kramer et al., “Second-trimester maternal serum marker screening: Maternal serum α-fetoprotein, β-human chorionic gonadotropin, estriol, and their various combinations as predictors of pregnancy outcome,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 968–974, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zeng, L. Yan, J. Lei, and W. Zhu, “Correlation between the maternal serum free β-hCG and uE2 levels of pregnant women and their pregnancy complications and its influence on the pregnancy outcomes,” Chinese Journal of Family Planning, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1714–1717, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Skeith, M. Blondon, and A. F. Ni, “Understanding and preventing placenta-mediated pregnancy complications,” Hämostaseologie, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 356–363, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Jena, N. R. Sharma, M. Petitt, D. Maulik, and N. R. Nayak, “Pathogenesis of preeclampsia and therapeutic approaches targeting the placenta,” Biomolecules, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 953, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ghasemi-Tehrani, A. Sadeghian, and R. Entezari, “Relationship between pregnancy complications and serum pregnancy associated-plasma-protein-a and free-β-human chorionic gonadotropin in the first trimester among Iranian women,” Journal of Family & Reproductive Health, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 219–224, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Sharony, D. Itzhaky, A. Amiel, A. Hershko, Y. Grinshpoon, and M. Fejgin, “Adverse outcome of pregnancies with extremely high levels of maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 233–236, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ju Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

328

Downloads

382

Citations