Complexity

Volume 2017, Article ID 4020548, 9 pages

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4020548

## Fixed-Time Complex Modified Function Projective Lag Synchronization of Chaotic (Hyperchaotic) Complex Systems

School of Electrical Engineering, University of Ulsan, 93 Daehak-ro, Nam-gu, Ulsan 680-749, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Hee-Jun Kang; rk.ca.naslu@gnakjh

Received 21 February 2017; Revised 11 April 2017; Accepted 7 May 2017; Published 13 July 2017

Academic Editor: Sigurdur F. Hafstein

Copyright © 2017 Xuan-Toa Tran and Hee-Jun Kang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

A novel fixed-time controller is proposed to perform fixed-time complex modified function projective lag synchronization of chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex systems. The synchronization is obtained after a finite time that could be preestablished without the knowledge of the initial states of both synchronized chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex systems. The global fixed-time stability of the closed-loop systems is rigorously proven based on Lyapunov analysis. Some simulation examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method and verify the theoretical results.

#### 1. Introduction

In the past two decades, much work has been devoted to investigate dynamic behavior and synchronization of chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex systems because of their potential applications. For instance, Gibbon and McGuinness [1] presented a complex set of Lorenz equations derived in laser optics and baroclinic instability, Zhang and Liu [2] applied synchronization to communication problem under considering time delay, and Wu et al. [3] proposed a method to improve the secure communications via passive synchronization of hyperchaotic complex systems. In the literature, researchers have introduced several types of synchronization of chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex systems such as complete synchronization (CoS) [4], antisynchronization (AS) [5], compound synchronization [6], projective synchronization (PS) [7], modified projective and modified function projective synchronization (MPS-MFPS) [8], combination-combination synchronization [9], complete lag synchronization (CoLS) [10], general hybrid projective complete dislocated synchronization [11], modified projective lag synchronization (MPLS) [12], and modified function projective lag synchronization (MFPLS) [13]. Recently, some new types of synchronization that utilized complex scaling factors have been introduced to achieve the synchronization of both module and phase, the concept first proposed by Nian et al. [14]. Complex complete synchronization (CCoS) [15, 16], complex projective synchronization (CPS) [17], combination complex synchronization [18], complex modified projective synchronization (CMPS) [19], and complex function projective synchronization (CFPS) [20, 21] are some examples. In these synchronizations, the scaling factors are complex numbers (or functions) that increase the unpredictability and complexity; they have thus significant meaning for enhancing the security of communication [20]. Observation from [8, 20, 21] shows that mentioned kinds of synchronizations only are special cases of complex modified function projective synchronization (CMFPS). Furthermore, there might be time delay between drive system and response system from practical point of view [13, 20, 21]; complex modified function projective lag synchronization (CMFPLS), which is a more general case, is rarely studied or not mentioned up to date.

In order to obtain such complex synchronization of chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex systems, some control methods such as Lyapunov-based control, feedback control and/or adaptive control [2, 5, 6, 8, 11–15, 17–20], passive control [3], finite-time stability theory-based control [4, 9, 16], nonlinear observer-based control [7], backstepping-based control [10], and adaptive fuzzy logic control [21] have been proposed. In the mentioned methods, while the ones in [4, 9, 16] ensure obtaining finite-time synchronization in which the convergence time still depends on both control design parameters and initial conditions, these remainders guarantee that the synchronization errors might converge to origin asymptotically in the best case. It is certain that synchronization errors could reach to zero in an amount of time which is more desirable object. Finite-time stability theory-based control methods have been known as useful and efficient techniques with some advanced properties such as fast and finite-time convergence, robustness, and high tracking precision [22]. In some last years, some researchers have introduced fixed-time stability concept, which is a further extension of finite-time stability one, in the literature [23–26]. The fixed-time stabilization problem of linear systems has solved in [23] based on nonlinear feedback control. Inspired by well-known super-twisting (STW) algorithm and high-order differentiator [27, 28], Basin et al. have proposed an adaptive STW-like controller with uniform finite/fixed convergence time in [24] and a continuous finite-time and fixed-time control method for an dimensional chain of integrators [25]. In [26], Polyakov et al. have introduced finite-time and fixed-time control methods for stabilizing linear multi-input-multioutput systems. The fixed-time control methods ensure that the origin of the system is stabilized in some finite time that is not dependent on the initial conditions; in other words, the convergent time is completely predefined via designed controller parameters.

Motivated by the above discussion, the main goal of this article is to propose a novel fixed-time control law to, for the first time, obtain fixed-time complex modified function projective lag synchronization of chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex systems; that is, the modified function projective lag synchronization (CMFPLS) error states converge to zero in a predefined amount of time despite initial conditions. The global stability and fixed-time convergence are rigorously proven, and an upper bound of the convergence time is estimated.

The rest of this paper is organized into four sections. Section 2 gives some preliminaries and problem formulation. In Section 3, a fixed-time controller is introduced to solve the CMFPLS problem. Two illustrative examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and the feasibility of the suggested control method in Section 4. Finally, some conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

*Notations*. and denote, respectively, the space of real number and complex number, and represents a block-diagonal matrix. If , the following notation is introduced for simplicity of expression [29]:where , and it can be verified that as ,If , that is, (superscripts and stand for the real and imaginary parts of the complex number , and , we then adopt the notation that .

#### 2. Preliminaries and Problem Formulation

First at all, some concepts related to finite-time stability and fixed-time stability given in [23] and a lemma that will be used in the analysis later are introduced as follows.

Consider the systemwhere and is a nonlinear function which can be discontinuous. Assume the origin is an equilibrium point of (3).

*Definition 1. *The origin of (3) is said to be globally finite-time stable if it is globally asymptotically stable and any solution of (3) reaches the equilibria at some finite-time moment; that is, , where is the settling-time function.

*Definition 2. *The origin of (3) is said to be globally fixed-time stable if it is globally finite-time stable and the settling-time function is bounded; that is, .

Lemma 3 (see [30], Jensen’s inequality). *One haswith and *

Two different dimensional complex chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems under this study are described as follows.

The drive system is where and are the state complex vector and the vector of nonlinear complex functions of the drive system, respectively.

And response system is where , and are the state complex vector, the vector of nonlinear complex functions, and the control inputs of the controlled response system, respectively.

Define complex modified function projective lag synchronization (CMFPLS) error between the drive system and the controlled response system as where is a function scaling matrix, are different and continuously differentiable bounded functions, for all is positive time lag, and ; here For convenience of notation, we utilize , and instead of , and , respectively.

Then, the CMFPLS error dynamics is determined by the following equation:

*Definition 4. *The fixed-time complex modified function projective lag synchronization between the drive system (3) and the response system (4) is achieved if there exists a time moment , which is independent of initial error states, , such that .

The main goal of this article is to design control laws such that the resulting closed-loop system is global fixed-time stability; that is, the fixed-time CMFPLS of the error system (5) is obtained in the sense of Definition 4.

*Remark 5. *The differential equation of form (3) is the expression of most of the well-known chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex systems such as chaotic (hyperchaotic) complex Chen, Lorenz, and Lü systems.

*Remark 6. *Besides several kinds of synchronization mentioned in the Introduction, CMFPLS considered in this study also consists of some other special cases such as complex function projective lag synchronization (CFPLS), complex modified projective lag synchronization (CMPLS), complex projective lag synchronization (CPLS), complex complete lag synchronization (CCoLS), complex lag antisynchronization (CLAS), complex antisynchronization (CAS), function projective lag synchronization (FPLS), function projective synchronization (PLS), projective lag synchronization (PLS), and lag antisynchronization (LAS) summarized in Table 1.