Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Complexity
Volume 2017, Article ID 4543563, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4543563
Research Article

Influence of Personal Preferences on Link Dynamics in Social Networks

1Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA
2University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
3US Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Ashwin Bahulkar; moc.liamg@rakluhabniwhsa

Received 10 April 2017; Revised 30 June 2017; Accepted 24 July 2017; Published 20 September 2017

Academic Editor: Katarzyna Musial

Copyright © 2017 Ashwin Bahulkar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook, “Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 27, pp. 415–444, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Lazarsfeld and R. K. FMerton, “Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis, Freedom and control in modern society,” pp. 18–66, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. T. Rivera, S. B. Soderstrom, and B. Uzzi, “Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 36, pp. 91–115, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. M. Blau, Structural contexts of opportunities, University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  5. S. L. Feld, “The Focused Organization of Social Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1015–1035, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. C. S. Fischer, To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city, University of Chicago Press, 1982.
  7. G. Mollenhorst, B. Völker, and H. Flap, “Social contexts and core discussion networks: Using a choice-constraint approach to study similarity in intimate relationships,” Social Forces, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 937–965, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Mollenhorst, B. Völker, and H. Flap, “Social contexts and personal relationships: The effect of meeting opportunities on similarity for relationships of different strength,” Social Networks, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 60–68, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Mollenhorst, B. Völker, and H. Flap, “Shared contexts and triadic closure in core discussion networks,” Social Networks, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 292–302, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. S. Burt, “Decay functions,” Social Networks, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Raeder, O. Lizardo, D. Hachen, and N. V. Chawla, “Predictors of short-term decay of cell phone contacts in a large scale communication network,” Social Networks, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 245–257, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. A. Hidalgo and C. Rodriguez-Sickert, “The dynamics of a mobile phone network,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 387, no. 12, pp. 3017–3024, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. L. Martin and K.-T. Yeung, “Persistence of close personal ties over a 12-year period,” Social Networks, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 331–362, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Lewis, J. Kaufman, M. Gonzalez, A. Wimmer, and N. Christakis, “Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com,” Social Networks, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 330–342, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Vaisey and O. Lizardo, “Can cultural worldviews influence network composition?” Social Forces, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1595–1618, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Striegel, S. Liu, L. Meng, C. Poellabauer, D. Hachen, and O. Lizardo, “Lessons learned from the NetSense smartphone study,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication on the Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, ACM SIGCOMM 2013, pp. 585–590, chn, August 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Bahulkar, B. K. Szymanski, O. Lizardo, Y. Dong, Y. Yang, and N. V. Chawla, “Analysis of link formation, persistence and dissolution in NetSense data,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2016, pp. 1197–1204, usa, August 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. N. Lichtenwalter, J. T. Lussier, and N. V. Chawla, “New perspectives and methods in link prediction,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '10), pp. 243–252, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Al Hasan, V. Chaoji, S. Salem, and M. Zaki, “Link prediction using supervised learning,” in Proceedings of SDM 06 workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism and Security, 2006.
  20. Y. Yang, N. V. Chawla, P. Basu, B. Prabhala, and T. La Porta, “Link prediction in human mobility networks,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2013, pp. 380–387, can, August 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. A. B. Snijders and C. Baerveldt, “A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 123–151, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. A. Snijders, J. Koskinen, and M. Schweinberger, “Maximum likelihood estimation for social network dynamics,” The Annals of Applied Statistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 567–588, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg, “The link prediction problem for social networks,” in Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '03), pp. 556–559, ACM, November 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Bahulkar, B. K. Szymanski, K. Chan, and O. Lizardo, “Co-evolution of two networks representing different social relations in NetSense,” in Complex Networks & Their Applications V, vol. 693 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 423–434, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. E. Kreyszig, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Wiley, 4th edition, 1979. View at MathSciNet
  26. O. Lizardo, “How cultural tastes shape personal networks,” American Sociological Review, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 778–807, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. DellaPosta, Y. Shi, and M. Macy, “Why do liberals drink lattes?” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 1473–1511, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. A. Diprete, A. Gelman, T. Mccormick, J. Teitler, and T. Zheng, “Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 1234–1283, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Ellemers and S. A. Haslam, “Social identity theory,” Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, pp. 379–398, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Wimmer and K. Lewis, “Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on facebook,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 583–642, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus