Optimization of Heterogeneous Container Loading Problem with Adaptive Genetic Algorithm

Table 5

Table of space utilization.

(a)

Data	BM[16]	N[18]	BR[19]	GB[20]	BG[10]	C[21]	B[13]
LN01	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%
LN02	90%	80.7%	90%	89.5%	96.6%	76.02%	89.8%
LN03	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%
LN04	55%	55%	55%	55%	55%	55%	55%
LN05	77.2%	77.2%	77.2%	77.2%	77.2%	77.19%	77.2%
LN06	83.1%	88.7%	83.1%	91.1%	91.2%	79.51%	92.4%
LN07	78.7%	81.8%	78.7%	83.3%	84.7%	72.14%	84.7%
LN08	59.4%	59.4%	59.4%	59.4%	59.4%	59.42%	59.4%
LN09	61.9%	61.9%	61.9%	61.9%	61.9%	61.89%	61.9%
LN10	67.3%	67.3%	67.3%	67.3%	67.3%	67.29%	67.3%
LN11	62.2%	62.2%	62.2%	62.2%	62.2%	62.16%	62.2%
LN12	78.5%	78.5%	78.5%	78.5%	78.5%	71%	78.5%
LN13	78.1%	84.1%	78.1%	85.6%	84.3%	84.14%	85.6%
LN14	62.8%	62.8%	62.8%	62.8%	62.8%	62.81%	62.8%
LN15	59.5%	59.5%	59.5%	59.5%	59.5%	59.46%	59.5%
Average	68.64%	69.00%	68.64%	69.95%	70.43%	66.93%	70.15%

(b)

Data	E[22]	M[24]	L[25]	W[26]	D[29]	LM[31]	This paper
LN01	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%	62.5%
LN02	90.8%	92.6%	80.4%	90.7%	86.3%	96.4%	95.41%
LN03	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.4%	53.43%
LN04	54.96%	55%	55%	55%	55%	55%	54.96%
LN05	77.2%	77.2%	77.2%	77.2%	77.2%	77.2%	77.19%
LN06	87.9%	91.7%	84.8%	92.9%	89.2%	93.5%	93.98%
LN07	84.7%	84.7%	77%	84.7%	83.2%	84.7%	84.66%
LN08	59.4%	59.4%	59.4%	59.4%	59.4%	59.4%	59.42%
LN09	61.9%	61.9%	61.9%	61.9%	61.9%	61.9%	61.89%
LN10	67.3%	67.3%	67.3%	67.3%	67.3%	67.3%	67.29%
LN11	62.2%	62.2%	62.2%	62.2%	62.2%	62.2%	62.16%
LN12	78.5%	78.5%	69.5%	78.5%	78.5%	78.5%	78.52%
LN13	85.6%	68%	73.3%	85.6%	85.6%	84.9%	85.61%
LN14	62.8%	62.8%	62.8%	62.8%	62.8%	62.8%	62.81%
LN15	59.5%	59.5%	59.5%	59.5%	59.5%	59.5%	59.46%
Average	69.91%	69.11%	67.08%	70.24%	69.60%	70.61%	70.62%