|
Order | Relative Complexity of Complexity Factors | Average |
|
(1) | Unclear requirements | 4.41 |
(2) | Mandate and objective uncertain, vague | 4.25 |
(3) | User uncommitted with the project | 4.19 |
(4) | Hidden mandate and objectives | 4.11 |
(5) | Dispersed team, not focused | 4.05 |
(6) | Expectations unlikely to be achieved | 4.03 |
(7) | Executive management uncommitted with the project | 4.03 |
(8) | Incompetence on using/applying Technology | 4.03 |
(9) | Little motivation of the project team | 3.95 |
(10) | Strategic Objectives (organizational) uncertain, vague | 3.94 |
(11) | No IT management support | 3.92 |
(12) | Numerous interested parties and lobbies | 3.91 |
(13) | Offshore/Near shore teams are not familiar with technical and business aspects | 3.91 |
(14) | Uncertain and changing regulatory Requirements | 3.85 |
(15) | Divergent interest of involved parties | 3.78 |
(16) | Many conflicting objectives | 3.74 |
(17) | Unknown stakeholders interrelations | 3.71 |
(18) | Sponsor uncommitted with project methodology | 3.64 |
(19) | No assistance to project management available | 3.57 |
(20) | Numerous/manifold, variety of methods and tools applied | 3.56 |
(21) | Very interdependent objectives | 3.53 |
(22) | Large number of objectives and multidimensional assessment of results | 3.53 |
(23) | Many Infrastructure, Telecommunication Constraints | 3.46 |
(24) | Few common standards applicable | 3.44 |
(25) | Stakeholders technology illiteracy | 3.41 |
(26) | Many different categories of stakeholders | 3.36 |
(27) | Dynamic team structure | 3.34 |
(28) | High percentage/proportion of PM work from total project work | 3.33 |
(29) | Too many new technologies in place | 3.27 |
(30) | Many sub-ordinates, large control span | 3.19 |
(31) | Totally Iterative methodology used | 3.19 |
(32) | Many important decisions in place | 3.15 |
(33) | Adaptive and variable leadership style | 3.14 |
(34) | Offshore teams/Near shore teams involved | 2.91 |
|