Research Article
Measuring the Complex Construct of Macroergonomic Compatibility: A Manufacturing System Case Study
Table 3
Correspondence among linguistic terms, fuzzy numbers, and crisp numbers for the MCQ-WV and MCQ-EV scales.
| Data | Type | Fuzzy number | Crisp number |
| MCQ-WV | Totally disagree | Punctuation | (0, 0, 0.4) | 0.13 | Strongly disagree | Punctuation | (0.2, 0.4, 0.6) | 0.4 | Neutral | Punctuation | (0.4, 0.6, 0.8) | 0.6 | Strongly agree | Punctuation | (0.6, 0.8, 1) | 0.8 | Totally agree | Punctuation | (0.8, 1, 1) | 0.93 |
| MCQ-EV | Very low | Weighting | (0, 0, 0.3) | 0.1 | Low | Weighting | (0, 0.25, 0.5) | 0.25 | Medium | Weighting | (0.3, 0.5, 0.7) | 0.5 | High | Weighting | (0.5, 0.75, 1) | 0.75 | Very high | Weighting | (0.7, 1, 1) | 0.9 |
|
|