Complexity

Complexity / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Control Design for Systems Operating in Complex Environments

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 7928495 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7928495

Jianing Zhang, Ge Ma, Zhifu Li, "Boundary Robust Adaptive Control of a Flexible Timoshenko Manipulator", Complexity, vol. 2018, Article ID 7928495, 10 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7928495

Boundary Robust Adaptive Control of a Flexible Timoshenko Manipulator

Guest Editor: Andy Annamalai
Received13 May 2018
Revised23 Aug 2018
Accepted28 Oct 2018
Published08 Nov 2018

Abstract

In this study, we aim to construct the boundary robust adaptive control for weakening the vibration of the flexible Timoshenko manipulator in the presence of unknown disturbances. By Lyapunov’s direct method, the adaptive controllers and disturbance observers are exploited to achieve the angle tracking and handle the external disturbances. With the suggested adaptive laws and disturbance observers, the controlled system with both parametric and disturbance uncertainties is guaranteed to be uniformly bounded. Finally, simulation results are provided to illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed control.

1. Introduction

With the development of the robotics and space technology, the flexible manipulator plays an essential part in the industrial production, aerospace, marine engineering, and so forth in recent years due to the advantages of light weight, lower energy consumption, and high speed operation [1, 2]. However, the external unknown disturbances exerted on the flexible structures will cause vibration, which will give rise to performance reduction of the system [3, 4]. As a consequence, it is necessary to design effective vibration control approaches for vibration abatement and performance improvement.

In order to prevent damage and enhance operational performance, a great deal of effort has been paid to develop effective control schemes [515]. These methods including modal control, distributed control, and boundary control make great contributions to the control problems of flexible structures. Modal control is a commonly used method which is based on truncated finite-dimensional modes, and this theory is well documented in [6, 7, 14]. Nevertheless, the truncated models are obtained via neglecting high-frequency modes, which can result in unstability of the system. For the sake of avoiding the spillover phenomenon, it can obtain better control performance by means of increasing the number of sensors and actuators, which is called distributed control [8]. In reality, the distributed control is hard to implement since it requires many sensors and controllers, and the distributed system becomes uncontrollable and unobservable when the point actuators and sensors are located at nodal points. For boundary control [1012], actuators only need to be installed at the boundaries of the system and it has been proved to be a valid method which can attenuate the vibration. Compared with modal control and distributed control, the boundary control is more effective for infinite dimensional system dynamical model since boundary controller can avoid spillover phenomenon and it is considered to be physically more realistic due to nonintrusive actuation and sensing [16, 17]. For instance, in [18], the boundary control and disturbance observer are developed for vibrating flexible manipulator system under external disturbances. In [19], the boundary control for a flexible manipulator with disturbances and input backlash is introduced to globally stabilize the vibration. To simplify the system analysis, the above-mentioned research usually ignores the shear deformation of the beam. In fact, the effect of the axial deformation and shear deformation should not be ignored when the diameter-to-length rate of the flexible beam is not small, and in this case, the manipulator system can be described as a Timoshenko manipulator. Namely, the shear deformation should be taken into account in the process of modeling a Timoshenko manipulator, which is usually ignored for the Euler-Bernoulli manipulator. It will be a more sophisticated and challenging problem to consider the nonlinear coupling of elastic deflection, shear deformation, and angular position in the control. For those cases, the control design is documented in [20, 21] to suppress the vibration and rotation of the system. In [20], for the flexible manipulator modeled as the Timoshenko beam, the boundary controllers are designed to eliminate the vibration and rotation of the system under external disturbances. However, in the aforesaid papers, there is no research taking into account the case that the parameters of the system and time-varying disturbances are unknown, which motivates us for this research.

In this paper, our interest lies in the boundary robust adaptive control of Timoshenko manipulator in the presence of both parametric and disturbance uncertainties. The adaptive laws and disturbance observers are put forward to compensate for the effect of parametric and disturbance uncertainties and achieve ultimate boundedness of the system. Compared with the existing work, the main contributions of this paper can be summarized as follows:

(i) Boundary robust adaptive controllers with disturbance observers are proposed when all the parameters and time-varying disturbances are unknown, by which the vibration is also reduced effectively.

(ii) With the proposed controllers, the uniform convergence of the Timoshenko manipulator system is obtained via Lyapunov’s direct method. By choosing appropriate parameters, the closed-loop system states eventually converge to a compact and the effectiveness of the system is guaranteed.

2. Problem Statement

2.1. Nomenclature

: length of the manipulator.: mass of the tip payload.: mass per unit length of the manipulator.: bending stiffness of the manipulator.: inertia of the payload.: a positive constant related to cross-sectional area of the manipulator.: modulus of elasticity in shear.: cross-sectional area of the manipulator.: inertia of the hub.: distributed inertia of the manipulator.

Figure 1 depicts a flexible Timoshenko manipulator system, in which , denotes the elastic deflection, the displacement is given as in the position for the small deformation, denotes the rotation of the beam’s cross-section owing to bending, denotes the angular position of the hub, denotes the control input, denotes the control input torque on the hub, and denotes the control input torque on the tip payload.

Assumption 1. For the Timoshenko manipulator system, considering the finite energies of the boundary disturbances, we assume that there exist three constants , such that . It is a reasonable assumption as the disturbances have finite energy and hence are bounded [22, 23].

Remark 2. We define notations as follows: , , , , and .

Remark 3. For analyzing the system stability and deriving our main results, we present the following inequality:where represents the boundary disturbances bounded with the unknown positive constants to be estimated by developing a set of disturbance observers .
In this study, the dynamical equation of the considered Timoshenko manipulator [20] is presented as follows:, with the following boundary conditions .

3. Controller Design

In this section, we investigate the boundary adaptive control and angular position tracking problem for the flexible Timoshenko manipulator. Our aim lies in developing boundary control schemes to weaken the vibration and shear deformation, handle system uncertainties, and guarantee the angular in the desired position.

Define intermediate variables asFor stabilizing the presented system given by (2)-(7), the following boundary adaptive control yieldswhere and denotes the angle error defined aswith being desired angle position, and vectors and parameter estimate vectors are defined asWe define parameter vectors and parameter estimate error vectors as Design the adaptive laws of the parameter estimate values and disturbance observers as with being positive constants and being diagonal positive-definite matrices.

Given the Lyapunov candidate function aswherewith .

Lemma 4. The constructed Lyapunov candidate function presented in (28) is a positive-definite functionInvoking Young’s inequality, it can be obtained from (31) Then, we further have where
We thus getThen, we further derive where .

Lemma 5. The time derivative of the Lyapunov candidate function (28) is upper bounded as where .
Differentiating (28) leads to is given as Then, we haveDifferentiating (30) and substituting the boundary conditions, we obtainThe third term of (38) is given asInvoking (40)-(42), we can obtain where the intermediate parameters are selected such thatThen, we have where , , and .

Theorem 6. For the system dynamics described by (2)-(7), under the developed control laws (11)-(13), if the initial conditions are bounded, we can conclude that the closed-loop states , , and are convergent.
Multiplying (37) by yieldsThen, we haveFinally, we getSimilarly, we can obtain

Remark 7. In this paper, the designs of controllers and observers are conducted on the basis of the infinite dimensional partial differential dynamics; hence there is absence of control spillover issue [24]. In future studies, we will exploit modal method to conduct neural network based control design for achieving the transient performance regulation [2528].

4. Simulations

In this article, the finite difference method [2931] is introduced for simulating the performance of the controllers proposed. The space step is chosen as 20, and the time step is chosen as 38000. The parameters of the system are given as =, =, =, =, =, =, =, =, and =. The initial conditions are , , and .

The disturbances are given as Figures 2 and 3 show the spatiotemporal response of the Timoshenko manipulator system under no control, that is, , influenced by external disturbances. Figures 4 and 5 display the spatiotemporal representation of the manipulator system under the proposed controllers by selecting the control design parameters , , , , , , , and . The angle position under proposed controllers is depicted in Figure 6. The two-dimensional responses of the designed control input and control input torque and are, respectively, shown in Figures 79. By employing the proposed adaptive updated laws, the estimation values of the parameters about are presented in Figures 1012.

From Figures 29, we can conclude that the developed boundary adaptive robust control laws can regulate the vibration and shear deformation of the manipulator system and position the manipulator in the desired angle with a better performance despite the existence of system uncertainties. From Figures 1012, we can learn that although the parameter estimation values are not able to converge to actual values quite precisely, the suggested control in this paper can stabilize the system with a better performance.

5. Conclusion

This study was concerned with boundary adaptive robust control scheme design for a flexible Timoshenko manipulator influenced by external disturbances. To suppress the vibration and shear deformation, realize the desired angular positioning, and cope with system uncertainties effect, three boundary adaptive robust controllers with disturbance observers were developed. Under the control schemes proposed, the bounded stability of the closed-loop system was guaranteed without simplification of PDE dynamics. In the end, simulations were executed to show the performance of the control schemes developed. Future interests lie in learning approaches [3238] for flexible manipulator system. Moreover, the implementation of the proposed control will be researched, and how to overcome the nonlinearities of the actuators is also a meaningful topic.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants nos. 61803110 and 61603105, by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province under Grant no. 2018A030310065, by the Guangzhou University’s Training Program for Excellent New-Recruited Doctors, and by the Innovative School Project of Education Department of Guangdong (2017KQNCX153 and 2017KZDXM060).

References

  1. Z. Liu, J. Liu, and W. He, “Dynamic modeling and vibration control for a nonlinear 3-dimensional flexible manipulator,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 3927–3945, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  2. R. Li, W. Wu, and H. Qiao, “The compliance of robotic hands - From functionality to mechanism,” Assembly Automation, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. X. He and Z. Zhao, “Boundary control design for a vibrating flexible string system with input nonlinearities,” Nonlinear Dynamics, pp. 1–11, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  4. Z. Zhao, Z. Liu, Z. Li, N. Wang, and J. Yang, “Control design for a vibrating flexible marine riser system,” Journal of The Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 18, pp. 8117–8133, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  5. S. He, Q. Ai, C. Ren, J. Dong, and F. Liu, “Finite-Time Resilient Controller Design of a Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems With Time-Delays Under Asynchronous Switching,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, pp. 1–6. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Armaou and P. D. Christofides, “Wave suppression by nonlinear finite-dimensional control,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 55, no. 14, pp. 2627–2640, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. D. Christofides and A. Armaou, “Global stabilization of the kuramoto-sivashinsky equation via distributed output feedback control,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 283–294, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. Bamieh, F. Paganini, and M. A. Dahleh, “Distributed control of spatially invariant systems,” The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1091–1107, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  9. Z. Liu, J. Liu, and W. He, “Robust adaptive fault tolerant control for a linear cascaded {ODE}-beam system,” Automatica, vol. 98, pp. 42–50, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  10. L. Zhang and J. Liu, “Observer-based partial differential equation boundary control for a flexible two-link manipulator in task space,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 2120–2133, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. W. He and S. S. Ge, “Cooperative control of a nonuniform gantry crane with constrained tension,” Automatica, vol. 66, pp. 146–154, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X. Wu and J. Deng, “Robust boundary control of a distributed-parameter flexible manipulator with tip unknown disturbance,” Control Theory & Applications, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3149–3152, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. C. Ma, “Fixed-time compliant motion/force control of robotic manipulators with environmental constraints,” Assembly Automation, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 271–277, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Pan, G. Bao, F. Xu, and L. Zhang, “Adaptive robust sliding mode trajectory tracking control for 6 degree-of-freedom industrial assembly robot with disturbances,” Assembly Automation, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. He, J. Song, and F. Liu, “Robust Finite-Time Bounded Controller Design of Time-Delay Conic Nonlinear Systems Using Sliding Mode Control Strategy,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1863–1873, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Z. Zhao, J. Shi, X. Lan, X. Wang, and J. Yang, “Adaptive neural network control of a flexible string system with non-symmetric dead-zone and output constraint,” Neurocomputing, vol. 283, pp. 1–8, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  17. Z. Zhao, X. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Liu, and J. Yang, “Neural network based boundary control of a vibrating string system with input deadzone,” Neurocomputing, vol. 275, pp. 1021–1027, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  18. T. Jiang, J. Liu, and W. He, “Boundary control for a flexible manipulator based on infinite dimensional disturbance observer,” Journal of Sound & Vibration, vol. 348, p. 14, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  19. W. He, X. He, M. Zou, and H. Li, “PDE model based boundary control design for a flexible robotic manipulator with input backlash,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. He, W. He, H. Qin, and C. Sun, “Boundary vibration control for a flexible Timoshenko robotic manipulator,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 875–882, 2018. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  21. T. Endo, M. Sasaki, and F. Matsuno, “Contact-force control of a flexible Timoshenko arm,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 1004–1009, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  22. Z. Zhao, Y. Liu, and F. Luo, “Output feedback boundary control of an axially moving system with input saturation constraint,” ISA Transactions®, vol. 68, pp. 22–32, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Z. Zhao, Y. Liu, W. He, and F. Luo, “Adaptive boundary control of an axially moving belt system with high acceleration/deceleration,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1299–1306, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  24. W. He, T. Meng, X. He, and S. S. Ge, “Unified iterative learning control for flexible structures with input constraints,” Automatica, vol. 96, pp. 326–336, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  25. C. Yang, C. Zeng, P. Liang, Z. Li, R. Li, and C.-Y. Su, “Interface Design of a Physical Human-Robot Interaction System for Human Impedance Adaptive Skill Transfer,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 329–340, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. Xu, D. Wang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Shi, “DOB based neural control of flexible hypersonic flight vehicle considering wind effects,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. PP, no. 99, p. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Zhang, Y. Dong, Y. Ouyang, Z. Yin, and K. Peng, “Adaptive Neural Control for Robotic Manipulators with Output Constraints and Uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Yang, X. Wang, L. Cheng, and H. Ma, “Neural-learning-based telerobot control with guaranteed performance,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Z. Liu, J. Liu, and W. He, “Modeling and vibration control of a flexible aerial refueling hose with variable lengths and input constraint,” Automatica, vol. 77, pp. 302–310, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  30. Z.-J. Zhao, Y. Liu, F. Guo, and Y. Fu, “Modelling and control for a class of axially moving nonuniform system,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 849–861, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  31. W. He and S. Zhang, “Control Design for Nonlinear Flexible Wings of a Robotic Aircraft,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 351–357, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S.-L. Dai, M. Wang, and C. Wang, “Neural learning control of marine surface vessels with guaranteed transient tracking performance,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1717–1727, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. Xu and Y. Shou, “Composite Learning Control of MIMO Systems with Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 6414–6424, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. Yang, X. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Li, and C. Su, “Teleoperation control based on combination of wave variable and neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S.-L. Dai, S. He, H. Lin, and C. Wang, “Platoon Formation Control With Prescribed Performance Guarantees for USVs,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 4237–4246, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. Xu and P. Zhang, “Minimal-Learning-Parameter Technique Based Adaptive Neural Sliding Mode Control of MEMS Gyroscope,” Complexity, vol. 2017, Article ID 6019175, 8 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  37. H. Ma, H. Liang, Q. Zhou, and C. K. Ahn, “Adaptive dynamic surface control design for uncertain nonlinear strict-feedback systems with unknown control direction and disturbances, IEEE Transactions on Systems,” Man and Cybernetics: Systems, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Z. Chen, C. Yang, X. Liu, and M. Wang, “Learning control of flexible manipulator with unknown dynamics,” Assembly Automation, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 304–313, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Jianing Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views471
Downloads494
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.