Research Article
Fault Diagnosis for Hydraulic Servo System Using Compressed Random Subspace Based ReliefF
Table 5
Fault diagnosis results with different combinations of features.
| Feature combination | Fault diagnosis accuracy of the 10-fold cross validation method (%) |
| | 94.62 | 95.17 | 94.29 | 94.40 | 93.81 | 94.11 | 93.54 | 95.12 | 95.01 | 93.98 | | 94.48 | 93.61 | 93.01 | 93.77 | 94.15 | 95.25 | 93.99 | 94.58 | 94.62 | 93.71 | | 92.04 | 93.62 | 93.11 | 93.25 | 91.37 | 94.54 | 93.27 | 92.32 | 93.29 | 93.41 | | 93.02 | 93.57 | 92.15 | 92.89 | 92.46 | 94.19 | 93.32 | 93.55 | 92.53 | 92.77 | KPCA1~KPCA4 | 93.08 | 93.78 | 93.07 | 93.57 | 92.17 | 93.04 | 92.80 | 92.42 | 93.48 | 93.36 | LLE1~LLE4 | 94.10 | 93.59 | 94.51 | 94.22 | 93.98 | 94.10 | 93.99 | 93.44 | 93.98 | 94.78 | F1 ~F9 | 92.67 | 91.80 | 93.54 | 92.47 | 92.11 | 93.64 | 92.97 | 93.62 | 94.01 | 93.00 |
|
|