Green Start-Ups’ Attitudes towards Nature When Complying with the Corporate Law

Table 5

Comparison of hypothesis.

Hypotheses	Effect	Path coefficient; (β)	Confident Interval; (2.5%)	Confident Interval (95%)	t-statistic (β/STDEV)	p-; Value	Supported
H1	ECC→ GAN	0.417	0,096	0,665	5.116	0,009	Yes
H2	ECC → EVM	0.697	0,551	0,825	2.905	0,000	Yes
H3	EVM → GAN	0.539	0,288	0,864	4.760	0,001	Yes
H4	EVM → BGI	0.780	0,673	0,878	6.375	0,000	Yes
H5	EVM → IC	0.597	0,462	0,727	2.737	0,000	Yes
H6	EVM → EI	0.730	0,548	0,873	8.395	0,000	Yes
H7	EVM → GO	0.773	0,692	0,850	4.476	0,000	Yes

Note. For n = 5000 subsamples, for t-distribution (499) Students in single queue: p < 0.05 (t (0.05;499) = 1.64791345); p < 0.01 (t(0.01;499) = 2.333843952); p < 0.001 (t(0.001;499) = 3.106644601).