Research Article
Optimal Dispatch of Reactive Power Using Modified Stochastic Fractal Search Algorithm
Table 5
Comparison of results obtained from IEEE 30-bus system with power loss optimization.
| Method | Min. | Aver. | Max. | Std. dev. | CPU time (s) | MaxIter | Npop | Nspi | ImLe (%) |
| EGA[17] | 4.55 | - | - | - | - | 100 | 50 | 50 | +0.78 | DE[20] | 4.555 | - | - | - | - | 500 | 150 | 150 | +0.89 | MDE[21] | 4.87359 | - | - | - | - | 1500 | 15 | 15 | +7.37 | PSO-TVIW[28] | 4.8458 | 4.8761 | 5.2292 | 0.0562 | 8.762 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +6.84 | PSO-TVAC[28] | 4.8449 | 4.8702 | 4.9655 | 0.0263 | 8.68 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +6.82 | SPSO-TVAC[28] | 4.5262 | 4.5564 | 4.7716 | 0.0554 | 9.092 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +0.26 | PSO-CF[28] | 4.5258 | 4.5711 | 4.999 | 0.0815 | 8.48 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +0.25 | PGS-PSO[28] | 4.6425 | 4.732 | 4.7972 | 0.1124 | 8.216 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +2.76 | SWT-PSO[28] | 4.6578 | 4.9413 | 5.2521 | 0.1221 | 7.995 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +3.08 | PGSWT-PSO[28] | 4.7914 | 5.2349 | 6.0512 | 0.2131 | 7.912 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +5.78 | IPGS-PSO[28] | 4.5256 | 4.5508 | 4.9493 | 0.0592 | 7.852 | 200 | 20 | 20 | +0.25 | FAHCLPSO[30] | 4.4877 | 4.6811 | 4.8732 | 0.1935 | - | - | - | - | -0.59 | GSA[32] | 4.51431 | - | - | - | - | 200 | 100 | 100 | 0.00 | GSA[34] | 4.616657 | - | - | - | - | 200 | - | - | +2.22 | QOTLBO[36] | 4.5594 | 4.5601 | 4.5617 | 0.037 | - | 100 | 50 | 100 | +0.99 | TLBO[36] | 4.5629 | 4.5695 | 4.5748 | 0.0564 | - | 100 | 50 | 100 | +1.07 | ALO[45] | 4.59 | | | | | 100 | - | - | +1.65 | MFOT[46] | 4.5128 | - | - | - | - | 300 | 30 | 30 | -0.03 | SSO [64] | 4.86029 | 5.2259 | 5.5975 | 0.19162 | 4.7 | 50 | 25 | ~30 | +7.119 | ISSO [64] | 4.51445 | 4.69215 | 4.52546 | 0.02799 | 4.5 | 50 | 25 | ~30 | +0.037 | MSFS | 4.5143 | 5.0932 | 6.721 | 0.5259 | 3.2 | 50 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 4.5128 | 4.6928 | 5.7126 | 0.2268 | 15.6 | 300 | 10 | 30 | - |
|
|