Complexity / 2019 / Article / Tab 6 / Research Article
Real-Time Warning and Risk Assessment of Tailings Dam Disaster Status Based on Dynamic Hierarchy-Grey Relation Analysis Table 6 Results of tailings dam evaluation index system weight.
Goals layer Guidelines Layer (weight) Indicators layer Current state weight Future state weight Tailings dam disaster risk identification U Inherent risk indicatorsU 1 (0.500) Maximum daily precipitation u 1-1 0.3825 0.1912 0.3825 0.1912 Seismic capacity of the dam u 1-2 0.2504 0.1252 0.1006 0.0503 Severity of tailings dam seepage u 1-3 0.1596 0.0798 0.2504 0.1252 Dam height u 1-4 0.1006 0.0503 0.0641 0.032 Nearby residential buildings u 1-5 0.0641 0.032 0.1596 0.0798 Total capacity of the reservoir u 1-6 0.0428 0.0214 0.0428 0.0214 Frequency indicators U 2 (0.500) Depth of the immersion line u 2-1 0.3813 0.1907 0.3825 0.1912 Displacement of the crack u 2-2 0.1584 0.0792 0.2504 0.1252 Length of the dry beach u 2-3 0.0636 0.0318 0.0428 0.0214 Dispersion between the top of the beach and the reservoir water level u 2-4 0.0412 0.0206 0.1596 0.0798 Surface horizontal displacement of the dam body u 2-5 0.2557 0.1279 0.1006 0.0503 Settlement of the surface of the dam body u 2-6 0.0998 0.0499 0.0641 0.032 Calculation result (Current state) Inherent risk consistency ratio: 0.0194; : 6.1225 Frequency risk consistency ratio: 0.0184; : 6.1160 Calculation result (Future state) Inherent risk consistency ratio: 0.0194; : 6.1225 Frequency risk consistency ratio: 0.0194; : 6.1225
Notes:
is the weight of the original indicator layer to the criteria layer;
is the weight of the original indicator layer to the target layer;
is the weight of the new indicator layer on the criteria layer;
isthe weight of the new indicator layer on the target layer.